Georger,
You obviously have a lot of knowledge and that’s important.
But you don’t need to state that something is “psycho-babble and interference”. You can’t lob a grenade like that and then claim that you’re just an observer…
If you disagree with something then either be polite and factual about it, or just bite your tongue.
Sarcasm and insults really turn people off, and there’s a ton of it on this forum.
Believe me, I understand, because I used to be the same way (I’m also a physicist/engineer).
It took me a while to figure out why people kept getting mad at me... I thought “being diplomatic” was BS. It’s not…
- Photon
But, it is my opinion based on years of observation of people ... its like when the FBI, or a lead agent, formulates/promulgates a message for the press about how money got to Tena Bar, in spite of the fact nobody believes the message being 'fed' the press. That is “psycho-babble and interference”. We hope to do better at forums. We promulgate the idea that this is open discussion where ideas, facts, and pressers are scrutinized.
But your point is taken and the terms were not directed at you personally. Now if you can come with a means for us to date the diatoms Tom found, for God's sake contact somebody! This has been batted around privately for months. Cesium is off the table, for one. High water levels over 10ft at TBar, when they happen, are in tandem with early diatoms. See the attached .... any ideas you have are welcome so far as I am concerned. Thanks.
ps* Digest TK's pdf thoroughly. It seems to be at the center of people's attention right now ... there is some there that has to be leveraged, if possible.