GEORGER I'm trying to understand your point. What are you attempting to prove?
I've spent an enormous amount of time analyzing Tena Bar from afar as well as on the ground. This last trip I spent time noting the layers of earth that make-up Tena Bar, identifying trees, even got drone footage. That's called research. What's wrong with that?
What have you done? What insight can you provide regarding Tena Bar or the money find? If you have any I'd love to hear it if it's not BS. After all, I'm attempting to understand precisely what happened at Tena Bar because I believe it's the Holy Grail in this case as it pertains to what happened and where.
My pov is quite simple: the money find is nothing but an artifact 'of the case'. The money find is not the case, and not the whole case.
But, my case facts are different from your 'case conjectures'.
That's the difference. Im not peddling a tv or movie production! I have no vested interest other than the "facts" of the case. One glaring fact about this case is: there is a huge lack of unimpeachable
facts. The gap includes everything from aspects of the flight path, when and where Cooper bailed and landed, and a lack of forensic facts about the money due to people's lack of laboratory testing when testing could and should have been done. That's the short version of my POV.
There is nothing glamorous about my pov.