Poll

How did the money arrive on Tena Bar

River Flooding
1 (5%)
Floated to it's resting spot via Columbia river
2 (10%)
Planted
6 (30%)
Dredge
11 (55%)
tossed in the river in a paper bag
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Voting closed: August 16, 2016, 09:05:28 AM

Author Topic: Tena Bar Money Find  (Read 1554634 times)

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3188
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6105 on: April 01, 2021, 04:40:17 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I spent 6 hours on Tena Bar yesterday, a lot of that time looking at it at a forensic level. The result of this additional research has led me to further refine the location of the money find spot. The new location is about 15 feet northwest of the previous location I identified. The new coordinates are: 45.718591, -122.759434.

This spot is extremely precise. I suspect it's within 5 feet of the actual spot if not right on the money. It was fine tuned by locating what I think is likely the only surviving tree from 1980. Of course, the gravel road and some other landmarks played a part too. Please give their names ...

Now that you have identified the location of the Ingram find to within a millimeter, can you identify which dope(s) were moving money fragments around into  2.5ft holes they were digging. The photo of CHAOS is attached. Which of these idiots was moving fragments around with his or her boots?
« Last Edit: April 01, 2021, 04:42:07 PM by georger »
 

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6106 on: April 01, 2021, 07:49:47 PM »
One of the fascinating things is to see the different layers that were identified by Palmer and two that he didn't identify.

More to the point, Palmer references the "Upper Active Layer" and the "Cross Bedded Course and Medium Sand" layer. These two layers combined are 24" deep according to Palmer. The portion visible today via erosion that has cut into the old gravel road shows that those top two layers are about three-and-a-half feet deep at that point.

Next, Palmer references the "Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture" layer and describes it as two-feet thick. Today you can easily see that layer and near the old gravel road it appears to be about two-and-a-half feet thick.

Finally, Palmer refers to the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer that starts at four-feet down and continues. This obviously indicates that they didn't dig much deeper than four feet.

Today, I can see that the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer is about two-and-a-half feet deep under which a spectacular "Fine Black Sand" layer rests. This layer runs the entire length of Tena Bar and appears to be about two-feet deep.

Then underneath the "Fine Black Sand" layer there is a "Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix" layer that begins about one foot above the river level and runs into the water.

All told these layers total about 11 1/2' according to my estimates. I believe this is reasonably close to accurate because the old gravel road appears to be between 12' and 15' above the normal level of the river.

This would mean that the money find spot is about 7'-8' feet above the normal level of the river.

I did collect samples of the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer, Fine Black Sand layer, and the Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix layer at the water's edge close to the money find spot which is under about four inches of water. These samples have been sent to Tom Kaye for analysis.

I kept a small sample of the Fine Black Sand layer and placed it into a very small glass jar with a top to preserve. I'm thinking of collecting some of this Fine Black Sand layer to place in small glass vials and making them available at CC21. Would be very cool.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3188
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6107 on: April 02, 2021, 12:44:34 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
One of the fascinating things is to see the different layers that were identified by Palmer and two that he didn't identify.

More to the point, Palmer references the "Upper Active Layer" and the "Cross Bedded Course and Medium Sand" layer. These two layers combined are 24" deep according to Palmer. The portion visible today via erosion that has cut into the old gravel road shows that those top two layers are about three-and-a-half feet deep at that point.

Next, Palmer references the "Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture" layer and describes it as two-feet thick. Today you can easily see that layer and near the old gravel road it appears to be about two-and-a-half feet thick.

Finally, Palmer refers to the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer that starts at four-feet down and continues. This obviously indicates that they didn't dig much deeper than four feet.

Today, I can see that the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer is about two-and-a-half feet deep under which a spectacular "Fine Black Sand" layer rests. This layer runs the entire length of Tena Bar and appears to be about two-feet deep.

Then underneath the "Fine Black Sand" layer there is a "Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix" layer that begins about one foot above the river level and runs into the water.

All told these layers total about 11 1/2' according to my estimates. I believe this is reasonably close to accurate because the old gravel road appears to be between 12' and 15' above the normal level of the river.

This would mean that the money find spot is about 7'-8' feet above the normal level of the river.

I did collect samples of the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer, Fine Black Sand layer, and the Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix layer at the water's edge close to the money find spot which is under about four inches of water. These samples have been sent to Tom Kaye for analysis.

I kept a small sample of the Fine Black Sand layer and placed it into a very small glass jar with a top to preserve. I'm thinking of collecting some of this Fine Black Sand layer to place in small glass vials and making them available at CC21. Would be very cool.

Well, you are lose with the facts here.
Upper active layer:  Palmer specifies 6-8" depth at the Ingram site. He gives no measurements at his second trench to the south of the Ingram site.
Cross Bedded Layer: Palmer does not give any measurements at either location. The 24" you cite is an extrapolation based on UAL vs CLLayer.
Clay Lump Layer: By extrapolation it begins at 24" at the Ingram site. Palmer says the CLL is 2ft thick at the Ingram site then deepens to 4ft thick 25 yards south of the Ingram site. The deeper thickness (4ft thick) 25 yards south of the Ingram site is consistent with the fact the north dredging spoil site was also south of the Ingram find site. The closer you get to where the spoils were dumped, the greater layer thickness you would expect to find. The issue then is could money have migrated north of the 1974 spoil site with current to the Ingram find site.   

If you are going to talk about Palmer at least cite what he says ....     
« Last Edit: April 02, 2021, 12:55:46 AM by georger »
 

Offline Dfs346

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Thanked: 35 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6108 on: April 02, 2021, 02:18:46 AM »
Here's a serious proposal for any member of this forum in the Portland/Vancouver area. It would require access to a marine vessel and a supply of water-resistant reusable transponders. The experiment would be:
* to navigate to an appropriate point in the Columbia River (for example, the midpoint, or the maximum depth isobath) between river miles 98 and 104
* to drop a canvas sack of approximately the same dimensions as the Flight 305 sack, containing 10,000 pieces of paper of the size and thickness of $20 bills
* to monitor the movement of the transponder until it either (a) reached a river bank or (b) passed river mile 97 opposite Tena Bar.
Ideally the experiment should be repeated at each river mile from 98 to 104.
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3188
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6109 on: April 02, 2021, 03:02:51 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Here's a serious proposal for any member of this forum in the Portland/Vancouver area. It would require access to a marine vessel and a supply of water-resistant reusable transponders. The experiment would be:
* to navigate to an appropriate point in the Columbia River (for example, the midpoint, or the maximum depth isobath) between river miles 98 and 104
* to drop a canvas sack of approximately the same dimensions as the Flight 305 sack, containing 10,000 pieces of paper of the size and thickness of $20 bills
* to monitor the movement of the transponder until it either (a) reached a river bank or (b) passed river mile 97 opposite Tena Bar.
Ideally the experiment should be repeated at each river mile from 98 to 104.

Can be simulated. Probability of money bag ever going to TBar = 0.  The Cooper money did not wash up on Tina Bar by any act of hydrology.

But you can spend $1mil running tests whereas a good programmer can run the simulations for $300 in his spare time. 
« Last Edit: April 02, 2021, 03:05:12 AM by georger »
 

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6110 on: April 02, 2021, 11:29:42 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
One of the fascinating things is to see the different layers that were identified by Palmer and two that he didn't identify.

More to the point, Palmer references the "Upper Active Layer" and the "Cross Bedded Course and Medium Sand" layer. These two layers combined are 24" deep according to Palmer. The portion visible today via erosion that has cut into the old gravel road shows that those top two layers are about three-and-a-half feet deep at that point.

Next, Palmer references the "Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture" layer and describes it as two-feet thick. Today you can easily see that layer and near the old gravel road it appears to be about two-and-a-half feet thick.

Finally, Palmer refers to the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer that starts at four-feet down and continues. This obviously indicates that they didn't dig much deeper than four feet.

Today, I can see that the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer is about two-and-a-half feet deep under which a spectacular "Fine Black Sand" layer rests. This layer runs the entire length of Tena Bar and appears to be about two-feet deep.

Then underneath the "Fine Black Sand" layer there is a "Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix" layer that begins about one foot above the river level and runs into the water.

All told these layers total about 11 1/2' according to my estimates. I believe this is reasonably close to accurate because the old gravel road appears to be between 12' and 15' above the normal level of the river.

This would mean that the money find spot is about 7'-8' feet above the normal level of the river.

I did collect samples of the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer, Fine Black Sand layer, and the Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix layer at the water's edge close to the money find spot which is under about four inches of water. These samples have been sent to Tom Kaye for analysis.

I kept a small sample of the Fine Black Sand layer and placed it into a very small glass jar with a top to preserve. I'm thinking of collecting some of this Fine Black Sand layer to place in small glass vials and making them available at CC21. Would be very cool.

This proves that Palmer was just plain wrong.

If my memory serves me correctly, it was the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer that Palmer thought was the dredge spoil layer. Well with the benefit of time and erosion I can see that the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer actually goes at least to under the old gravel road. Needless to say, there is no reasonable way to explain a dredge spoil layer being found under the gravel road.

It also makes me wonder where Palmer thought the top two layers of sand that are above the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer came from--especially considering the constant erosion taking place.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3188
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6111 on: April 02, 2021, 03:24:46 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
One of the fascinating things is to see the different layers that were identified by Palmer and two that he didn't identify.

More to the point, Palmer references the "Upper Active Layer" and the "Cross Bedded Course and Medium Sand" layer. These two layers combined are 24" deep according to Palmer. The portion visible today via erosion that has cut into the old gravel road shows that those top two layers are about three-and-a-half feet deep at that point.

Next, Palmer references the "Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture" layer and describes it as two-feet thick. Today you can easily see that layer and near the old gravel road it appears to be about two-and-a-half feet thick.

Finally, Palmer refers to the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer that starts at four-feet down and continues. This obviously indicates that they didn't dig much deeper than four feet.

Today, I can see that the "Older Uniform Sands Light in Color" layer is about two-and-a-half feet deep under which a spectacular "Fine Black Sand" layer rests. This layer runs the entire length of Tena Bar and appears to be about two-feet deep.

Then underneath the "Fine Black Sand" layer there is a "Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix" layer that begins about one foot above the river level and runs into the water.

All told these layers total about 11 1/2' according to my estimates. I believe this is reasonably close to accurate because the old gravel road appears to be between 12' and 15' above the normal level of the river.

This would mean that the money find spot is about 7'-8' feet above the normal level of the river.

I did collect samples of the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer, Fine Black Sand layer, and the Fine Black Sand and Fine Light Sand Mix layer at the water's edge close to the money find spot which is under about four inches of water. These samples have been sent to Tom Kaye for analysis.

I kept a small sample of the Fine Black Sand layer and placed it into a very small glass jar with a top to preserve. I'm thinking of collecting some of this Fine Black Sand layer to place in small glass vials and making them available at CC21. Would be very cool.

This proves that Palmer was just plain wrong.

If my memory serves me correctly, it was the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer that Palmer thought was the dredge spoil layer. Well with the benefit of time and erosion I can see that the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer actually goes at least to under the old gravel road. Needless to say, there is no reasonable way to explain a dredge spoil layer being found under the gravel road.

It also makes me wonder where Palmer thought the top two layers of sand that are above the Organic Clay Lump & Course Sand Mixture layer came from--especially considering the constant erosion taking place.

Maybe the problem is your stance?

"Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not? RFK"

Ask Bruce Smith. He interprets dreams. ?

Some merely read the Palmer report and do fine! We read the report for what it is and have none of these problems you raise! 

If you are now claiming to be a better more experienced geologist than Palmer was .... then dream on.  :)
« Last Edit: April 02, 2021, 03:31:08 PM by georger »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1025 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6112 on: April 02, 2021, 05:07:29 PM »
Didn't the Army Corps. identify the dredge layer. I know they did something?
 

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6113 on: April 02, 2021, 05:15:58 PM »
I'm not certain what the Army Corp did or didn't do. Nonetheless, and dredge spoils would have been above the clay layer.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline fcastle866

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
  • Thanked: 108 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6114 on: April 02, 2021, 09:46:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Didn't the Army Corps. identify the dredge layer. I know they did something?

If the money did come from dredging, what flight path would that support?  The dredging came from pretty close to Tena Bar anyhow didn't it?  I'm fairly neutral on the money find, it is just really interesting how that one stack of bills has fueled so much speculation. 
 

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6115 on: April 02, 2021, 10:31:33 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Didn't the Army Corps. identify the dredge layer. I know they did something?

If the money did come from dredging, what flight path would that support?  The dredging came from pretty close to Tena Bar anyhow didn't it?  I'm fairly neutral on the money find, it is just really interesting how that one stack of bills has fueled so much speculation.

That would support the so-called Western Flight Path which has been discussed at some length here over the past decade.
 

Offline MarkBennett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
  • Thanked: 26 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6116 on: April 02, 2021, 10:49:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I spent 6 hours on Tena Bar yesterday, a lot of that time looking at it at a forensic level. The result of this additional research has led me to further refine the location of the money find spot. The new location is about 15 feet northwest of the previous location I identified. The new coordinates are: 45.718591, -122.759434.

This spot is extremely precise. I suspect it's within 5 feet of the actual spot if not right on the money. It was fine tuned by locating what I think is likely the only surviving tree from 1980. Of course, the gravel road and some other landmarks played a part too.
"right on the money"......ha ha.   good one.
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3188
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6117 on: April 03, 2021, 12:25:44 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Didn't the Army Corps. identify the dredge layer. I know they did something?

If the money did come from dredging, what flight path would that support?  The dredging came from pretty close to Tena Bar anyhow didn't it?  I'm fairly neutral on the money find, it is just really interesting how that one stack of bills has fueled so much speculation.

Good question. It all depends on his drop zone.

H attempted to solve this dilemma by ordering everyone to publicize the Washougal washdown idea. Few subscribed. It was really Seattle's obligation to explain the Ingram find on the Columbia - they left it undecided. An informal poll of Portland agents favored the dredging theory. That is Schreuder's opinion to this day.

Of all the issues still undecided its amazing nobody has concocted a theory for how Cooper walked back toward Portland and lost the money on the way.
 

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6118 on: April 03, 2021, 09:13:12 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Didn't the Army Corps. identify the dredge layer. I know they did something?

If the money did come from dredging, what flight path would that support?  The dredging came from pretty close to Tena Bar anyhow didn't it?  I'm fairly neutral on the money find, it is just really interesting how that one stack of bills has fueled so much speculation.

I believe the dredge theory has been proved false. This is based upon four things:

1) The dredge spoils were shown to have been placed and spread well south (upstream) from the money burial spot.

2) In order for the dredge theory to be accurate, three individual packets would have had to migrate several hundred feet to the burial spot during a June high water event and self-bury via wave action at the water's edge which would shatter the diatoms--shattered diatoms is inconsistent with Tom's findings.

3) The soonest June high water event was seven months after the skyjacking. By this time the rubber bands on the money would have lost their integrity based upon Tom's research.

4) Three individual packets migrating and self-burying together is mathematically close to impossible if not impossible.

Of note, numbers 2, 3 and 4 would also be applicable to any theory that requires the money to migrate from some point south of the burial spot. Therefore, the only plausible explanation for three packets being buried on Tena Bar is that DB Cooper himself buried the money.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2021, 10:53:15 AM by EU »
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline fcastle866

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
  • Thanked: 108 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6119 on: April 03, 2021, 11:11:49 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Didn't the Army Corps. identify the dredge layer. I know they did something?

If the money did come from dredging, what flight path would that support?  The dredging came from pretty close to Tena Bar anyhow didn't it?  I'm fairly neutral on the money find, it is just really interesting how that one stack of bills has fueled so much speculation.

I believe the dredge theory has been proved false. This is based upon four things:

1) The dredge spoils were shown to have been placed and spread well south (upstream) from the money burial spot.

2) In order for the dredge theory to be accurate, three individual packets would have had to migrate several hundred feet to the burial spot during a June high water event and self-bury via wave action at the water's edge which would shatter the diatoms--shattered diatoms is inconsistent with Tom's findings.

3) The soonest June high water event was seven months after the skyjacking. By this time the rubber bands on the money would have lost their integrity based upon Tom's research.

4) Three individual packets migrating and self-burying together is mathematically close to impossible if not impossible.

Of note, numbers 2, 3 and 4 would also be applicable to any theory that requires the money to migrate from some point south of the burial spot. Therefore, the only plausible explanation for three packets being buried on Tena Bar is that DB Cooper himself buried the money.

I'm neutral on the money find overall, and enjoy all the details that people have gone into like you and Tom.  And for some reason last night I was thinking that even if the dredge theory was true, we would then all be trying to figure out how the 3 packets got to the site of the dredge.  If there are people hell bent on the dredge theory, then I have not seen any of them explain how Cooper got to the spot of the dredge, or if we even know where the dredges originated.