A few points worth noting:
R99 and I agree on the Western Flight Path. However, we do not agree on Cooper surviving/dying, and the timing of the flight to some degree.
Yet, we have never had a solitary disparaging word pass between the two of us.
Likewise, Bruce Smith and I are probably as far apart on the Cooper case as anyone here. Bruce is more of a conspiracy-type of guy, on the other hand, I am much more vanilla in my beliefs.
Yet again, Bruce and I have never had a solitary disparaging word pass between the two of us.
How is this possible?
This is possible because we are civilized and treat each other with respect.
May I suggest that those who struggle to act in a similar civilized and respectful manner try a little harder?
Better yet, if you feel that someone is flat out wrong about an assertion, perhaps you could present a cogent, fact-based, argument in an attempt to gain a new believer?