Does anyone have the full Palmer Report? Or do we only have the summary found on the Forum website?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Does anyone have the full Palmer Report? Or do we only have the summary found on the Forum website?

Galen Cook says Eng gave him a copy of the "full" Palmer Report. ... whatever "full" means. 

Why? Is there some question?

I was just looking for something to read 

I believe Ingrams gives the same story about the serial number in a interview. I know he gave one to Ralph. that made him call back knowing he was truthful of what he had.

I told Flyjack since we don't have the lab report it's hard to say what they did to the bills. a simple answer could be in the lab report..

My main problem with Flyjack is his poor use of English, and knowing exactly what he is saying. He says quote:

"L55376548B was the bill on the top one of the of the packets the Ingrams had that Ralph Himmelsbach Id'd as matching the FBI list."     What is he saying !?

It's already been established Harold called in serial numbers plural, to be verified, not just one. The FBI Getty image of the groups of bills the Ingrams turned in, shows L55376548B is the top bill, on the top group of bills showing, in the second column of groups pictured in the Getty image. See Getty photo below! Maybe this is what Flyjack means when he writes: "was the bill on the top one of the of the packets the Ingrams had" ?? The serial number L55376548B matches the photo of one bill FJ posted, with the top bill on the top group (second column) of bills shown in the Getty photo.

That does not mean that L55376548B was the top bill on the whole Ingram find! That information was lost when the Ingrams pulled their find from the sand in pieces, and stuffed everything into a sandwich bag.

We know that the Ingrams tried to separate and clean bills back at the apartment. The Getty photo evidently shows the fruits of their efforts, separating and cleaning. That photo shows the groups of money the Ingrams turned in to the FBI, placed on a table for photographing. L55376548B is shown in that photo as the top bill in one of the twelve groups photographed.

However, this photo does not show four more bills the Ingrams held back from the FBI as souvenirs, but were convinced to turn in later! 

L55376548B may be one of the serial numbers Harold called in, because it was easily seen being the top bill in one group of bills he had. He may have called in other serial numbers from top bills in other groups we can see in the Getty photo. Only the FBI knows for sure what serial numbers Harold called in, and how many numbers, or what he actually said during his two phone calls.

In Flyjack's photo of L55376548B there is a MC or MV and a line in ballpoint ink on the bill. It intersects the T in TWENTY on the right side of the bill. Im not sure I see that artifact in the Getty photo - do you? So there is one more thing to puzzle over, and make claims about perhaps? 

I seem to recall that the initials were made later by the agents. that's why we don't see them in the photo soon after the discovery?

It's either MLJ or MVJ?

Look at some of the other bills with the initials on them. some are better than others.I haven't really looked at them all.

Looks more like MLJ.

I seem to recall that the initials were made later by the agents. that's why we don't see them in the photo soon after the discovery?

It's either MLJ or MVJ?

Why is anyone marking the evidence with a ballpoint pen! ?  Who is MVJ or whatever it is? And WHY!?

Comments made by PCGS.  seem to clear this up.

However back to the original issue: Ingram called in multiple serial numbers, not just one. Tom has the same files I do. There is no evidence whatever that L55376548B was the top bill 'on the packets of bundles of bushels'    Ingrams pulled out of the sand. Even if it was, which it is not, there is no guarantee L55376548B was the top bill on any given bundle unless you can go back and reconstruct the serial numbers used to construct each bundle or packet or parcel (whatever terms Fyjack is now using). 

Flyjack also claims two bundles were given to each stew! Where is his evidence for that? Where was Hancock at the time the transaction between Cooper and Tina took place? Tina is very specific in her interview notes about how the transaction occurred and who was involved or not. I dont recall Hancock even being physically present next to Tina at the time.   

Its pretty obvious you and FJ have been exchanging ideas about all of this somewhere, sometime ... maybe keep the rest of us informed about what is going on? If you dont share the knowledge about what is happening on three different forums it is difficult to know what has happened and what was said or presented somewhere in time ....

It is not news that Flyjack is trying to interpret everything to support his suspect, while also reviewing and making claims based on comments in FBI 302s being released!  It's impossible to know where one ends and the other begins. FJ is merging the two.  As usual there are more questions than answers, with people making important claims in the middle of that. Its impossible to keep up with across the space of three forums and people talking on the side of that!

When we  lose continuity across three forums we lose everything.