Poll

How did the money arrive on Tena Bar

River Flooding
1 (5%)
Floated to it's resting spot via Columbia river
2 (10%)
Planted
6 (30%)
Dredge
11 (55%)
tossed in the river in a paper bag
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Voting closed: August 16, 2016, 09:05:28 AM

Author Topic: Tena Bar Money Find  (Read 1598164 times)

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2700 on: March 15, 2017, 01:39:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path.  This has been discussed to death for the last several years both here on Shutter's site, the DropZone sites, and elsewhere.  Also, the location where the placard from the aft stairs was found also generally supports the Tina Bar flight path.  In addition, the markings on the "FBI map", that have been previously discussed, supports the Tina Bar flight path.  All aircraft that initially tried to intercept the airliner in the Portland area were vectored to the west side of Portland.

Does the fact that the money was not found at Ariel give you confidence in the FBI flight path? :))  NO PILOT WOULD HAVE FLOWN THAT HIJACKED AIRLINER IN THE SEGMENTED FLIGHT PATH INDICATED ON THE FBI MAP!!!!!  Or to put it another way, there is absolutely NO evidence to support the FBI flight path.

If some of the money fell from the aft stairs, it would probably have landed in downtown Vancouver.

The money find at Tina Bar is a fact, the location where the placard was found is a fact, and you do not get to cherry pick your facts and theories.  The money at Tina Bar was found several feet higher than the nominal Columbia River water level.  How do you explain that?

The money find at Tina Bar is the single most important piece of information as to where Cooper jumped, whether he was a no-pull, where he landed, and the subsequent moving of the money to Tina Bar.  All of this has been discussed at great length previously.  Further, Mother Nature did it all, except for explaining why Cooper was a no-pull.
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2701 on: March 15, 2017, 01:46:05 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Nevertheless, when the crew thought Cooper had jumped, the co-pilot, by his own admission, told the Center controllers to "mark your maps".  He obviously did not know their exact position at that time or else he would have told the controllers where they were.  This means they were NOT on V-23 at that point and were just flying vectors as directed by the controllers.

In addition if the clock is wrong by just minutes then the plane is south of where the NWA Search map thinks it is at 8:11.  Of course radar tapes were supposed to solve everything, and did according to Tom Kaye.  :))

Your comments about the clock are correct.  The most accurate times are the GMT times that are embedded in the ATC communications tapes.  The clock(s) on the instrument panel in that 1971 time frame were typically set to within about 10 seconds of GMT.  Of course, if one of the flight crew had a Bulova Accutron wrist watch, it would probably be within 5 seconds of GMT. 
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2702 on: March 15, 2017, 02:11:46 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2703 on: March 15, 2017, 02:44:17 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2704 on: March 15, 2017, 03:00:35 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2705 on: March 15, 2017, 03:05:54 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

how the money got there.. = Mother Nature got it there..
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2706 on: March 15, 2017, 03:17:44 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

how the money got there.. = Mother Nature got it there..

Could the money have made it to TBAR and the plane be on the FBI flightpath, YES or NO?
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2707 on: March 15, 2017, 03:34:21 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

how the money got there.. = Mother Nature got it there..

Could the money have made it to TBAR and the plane be on the FBI flightpath, YES or NO?

NO!  At this point in time, I am not aware of anyone who supports the Washougal Wash Down Theory or any modification of that.

In all probability, Cooper was a no-pull who landed on solid ground in a very small area bounded by the east side of Caterpillar Island and the Northwest Lower River Road.  Then probably during the 1972 spring floods, the river level reached Cooper's elevation and the money, and probably Cooper also, were washed several hundred feet down the channel on the east side of Caterpillar Island and hung up (under water) at the point where the money was later found.

Everything but the money that was found, then went on downstream before the water receded to the money find elevation.   
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2708 on: March 15, 2017, 03:40:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

how the money got there.. = Mother Nature got it there..

Could the money have made it to TBAR and the plane be on the FBI flightpath, YES or NO?

NO!  At this point in time, I am not aware of anyone who supports the Washougal Wash Down Theory or any modification of that.

In all probability, Cooper was a no-pull who landed on solid ground in a very small area bounded by the east side of Caterpillar Island and the Northwest Lower River Road.  Then probably during the 1972 spring floods, the river level reached Cooper's elevation and the money, and probably Cooper also, were washed several hundred feet down the channel on the east side of Caterpillar Island and hung up (under water) at the point where the money was later found.

Everything but the money that was found, then went on downstream before the water receded to the money find elevation.

The real answer is YES, the Washougal theory is irrelevant and a strawman..

The hijacker may have lost some money on the aft stairs and delayed it fell into the Columbia.. OR another unknown explanation.


It is irrational to say NO... because it is "unknown"
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2709 on: March 15, 2017, 03:51:03 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

how the money got there.. = Mother Nature got it there..

Could the money have made it to TBAR and the plane be on the FBI flightpath, YES or NO?

NO!  At this point in time, I am not aware of anyone who supports the Washougal Wash Down Theory or any modification of that.

In all probability, Cooper was a no-pull who landed on solid ground in a very small area bounded by the east side of Caterpillar Island and the Northwest Lower River Road.  Then probably during the 1972 spring floods, the river level reached Cooper's elevation and the money, and probably Cooper also, were washed several hundred feet down the channel on the east side of Caterpillar Island and hung up (under water) at the point where the money was later found.

Everything but the money that was found, then went on downstream before the water receded to the money find elevation.

The real answer is YES, the Washougal theory is irrelevant and a strawman..

The hijacker may have lost some money on the aft stairs and delayed it fell into the Columbia.. OR another unknown explanation.


It is irrational to say NO... because it is "unknown"

FLYJACK,  this line of reasoning is beginning to border on the "alternate facts" theory that has recently been proposed in USA politics. :o
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2710 on: March 15, 2017, 04:09:58 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

how the money got there.. = Mother Nature got it there..

Could the money have made it to TBAR and the plane be on the FBI flightpath, YES or NO?

NO!  At this point in time, I am not aware of anyone who supports the Washougal Wash Down Theory or any modification of that.

In all probability, Cooper was a no-pull who landed on solid ground in a very small area bounded by the east side of Caterpillar Island and the Northwest Lower River Road.  Then probably during the 1972 spring floods, the river level reached Cooper's elevation and the money, and probably Cooper also, were washed several hundred feet down the channel on the east side of Caterpillar Island and hung up (under water) at the point where the money was later found.

Everything but the money that was found, then went on downstream before the water receded to the money find elevation.

The real answer is YES, the Washougal theory is irrelevant and a strawman..

The hijacker may have lost some money on the aft stairs and delayed it fell into the Columbia.. OR another unknown explanation.


It is irrational to say NO... because it is "unknown"

FLYJACK,  this line of reasoning is beginning to border on the "alternate facts" theory that has recently been proposed in USA politics. :o

No it isn't, it is simple logic

Your bias is that the money didn't get to TBAR from the FBI flightpath because we can't explain it .. therefore the flightpath must be wrong and it went over TBAR.

This is false, because we don't know how doesn't mean it didn't happen..

You have elevated an unknown to a negation.. and then incorporated it into your argument.
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2711 on: March 15, 2017, 11:30:49 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My confidence level in my theory is 95+ percent.  Basically, the money at Tina Bar could not have gotten there by any other means. Robert99

You have pointed out inconsistencies, contradictions and missing info for the FBI flightpath. However, no smoking gun to prove the TBAR path vs FBI path. The other issue is logic and human nature. Not knowing how the money got to TBAR suggests another flightpath. This is false logic.

If the money were never found at TBAR would you have a 95% confidence in that flightpath? In other words, a search to reconcile the unknown is part of human nature but not necessarily true. We all do it.

If Cooper did lose some of the money on the stairway and it fell off minutes later into the Columbia (in the briefcase or tied up in a piece of the chute) that would explain and reconcile TBAR and the FBI flightpath. There may be another explanation that we don't know.

I am not discounting your theory as an option but I have far less confidence in it. There is still stronger evidence for the FBI flightpath.

Take out the TBAR money find and where do we stand on the fightpath options..

The money find at Tina Bar, in and of itself, supports the flight path. 

No it doesn't actually, the reason you infer it does is because it is "unexplained"...

Using absence of evidence as evidence is good for theorizing but it doesn't carry factual weight.

The evidence for a TBAR flightpath vs FBI path should stand without the TBAR money location.

By what violation of logic can you refer to the Tina Bar money as "absence of evidence"? ::)  It is evidence!  And there are other factors supporting the Tina Bar flight path as explained in my previous post.  There is NOTHING, repeat NOTHING, to support the FBI flight path.

Absence of evidence =  how the money got there.. not, that the money was found there.

how the money got there.. = Mother Nature got it there..

Could the money have made it to TBAR and the plane be on the FBI flightpath, YES or NO?

NO!  At this point in time, I am not aware of anyone who supports the Washougal Wash Down Theory or any modification of that.

In all probability, Cooper was a no-pull who landed on solid ground in a very small area bounded by the east side of Caterpillar Island and the Northwest Lower River Road.  Then probably during the 1972 spring floods, the river level reached Cooper's elevation and the money, and probably Cooper also, were washed several hundred feet down the channel on the east side of Caterpillar Island and hung up (under water) at the point where the money was later found.

Everything but the money that was found, then went on downstream before the water receded to the money find elevation.

The real answer is YES, the Washougal theory is irrelevant and a strawman..

The hijacker may have lost some money on the aft stairs and delayed it fell into the Columbia.. OR another unknown explanation.


It is irrational to say NO... because it is "unknown"

FLYJACK,  this line of reasoning is beginning to border on the "alternate facts" theory that has recently been proposed in USA politics. :o

No it isn't, it is simple logic

Your bias is that the money didn't get to TBAR from the FBI flightpath because we can't explain it .. therefore the flightpath must be wrong and it went over TBAR.

This is false, because we don't know how doesn't mean it didn't happen..

You have elevated an unknown to a negation.. and then incorporated it into your argument.

Obviously, the whole problem needs further evidence.  :))
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1597
  • Thanked: 444 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2712 on: April 03, 2017, 05:07:27 PM »
A barge named DB Cooper. Spotted Sausalito CA April 2017.

377
 

MeyerLouie

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2713 on: April 03, 2017, 06:50:11 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A barge named DB Cooper. Spotted Sausalito CA April 2017.

377

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, that's funny.  Maybe the Alcatraz boys who broke out swam over that way and named it, just to throw off the authorities.  Ha.

Meyer
 

Offline sailshaw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #2714 on: April 04, 2017, 10:07:05 AM »
337   The barge was probably named "DB Cooper" to give it a long life just like the DB Story. It might last forever!

Bob Sailshaw
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
PS   When I view very closely the History Channel 4 hr program, I see the Tina Bar money was a plant by the Father Dwayne Ingram and that is why he told his son exactly where to fine the money. Big question is where did Dwayne get the money. Did DB give it to him that night as a thank-you for driving him to Portland?