Poll

How did the money arrive on Tena Bar

River Flooding
1 (5%)
Floated to it's resting spot via Columbia river
2 (10%)
Planted
6 (30%)
Dredge
11 (55%)
tossed in the river in a paper bag
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Voting closed: August 16, 2016, 09:05:28 AM

Author Topic: Tena Bar Money Find  (Read 1357791 times)

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #225 on: November 02, 2014, 01:06:05 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I took the photo and zoomed in on it and used a mask generator and found what appears to be transparent grid paper overlapping the map? the dark spot in the circle is art of the grid.

The center portion where the grid corners are, or holes seem to be the same color as the circle. could the person who made the circle also dotted the position of the money find that people have claimed was close to the river? I took the portion where it appears a mark was made and put it beside the penciled circle mark is and it matched?

Who circled the map?

Took what photo and zoomed it?

I guess I should have noted that. that's a close up of Tena Bar where the money location is circled on the 1979 view/photo
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #226 on: November 19, 2014, 03:53:14 PM »
The usual story about how Brian and the Ingrams found the money, may be wrong -

A review of combined press and FBI agent accounts of Brian and Harold Ingram's initial statements of how the Ingram find occurred, is yielding a different version of how the Ingram find happened, in the Ingram's own words, with some important implications for what the actual scene was at Tena Bar when Cooper money was found there.
The usual account is that Brian was sweeping out a depression for a fire pit in the sand, encountered an obstacle and uncovered it, thus revealing bundles of Cooper bills. That version may be myth.

The actual statements of Brian, Harold, and each party present at the time agree in that Harold had suggested building a fire for everyone to warm up with, and Harold began collecting drift wood nearby to where the children (Brian and Denise Ingram) were playing. Patricia and Crystal Ingram were walking together at a further distance away discussing personal matters. It is not apparent that Harold had made any request to have a fire pit made. The children in fact (Brian and Denise), were playing together and simply dropped down and began playing in the sand.

 Brian says:  "I saw that money (poking out). I thought WOWIE! I saw it was money and ran over to my parents. They thought it was counterfeit.  

 Harold Ingram says: I was wanting to make a fire. (starting to collect wood) He (Brian) ran up to me and said "Wait a minute Daddy. I have found some money." I went over to where Brian was and raked a place out in the sand where it was.

Both Brian and Harold repeat these same elements in their earliest version of their story given to FBI agents and in the initial press interviews, eg. Bob Baum Wed Feb 13 Eugene Register-Guard. Crystal Ingram recounts the same  story of what Brian and her daughter Denise were doing, what Harold was doing and where, and what happened after Brian ran over to get his Dad who then went over to where Denise was still waiting, and it was Harold who wiped sand away, not Brian, which revealed more of the money Brian had seen.

The important forensic point is Brian saw "money" before any uncovering or digging had been done. The money was visible on the surface and that is what caught Brian's attention. It was Harold, not Brian, who then came over and uncovered the money, and called Patricia and Crystal Ingram to come and see.

This agrees with what the FBI agents who first canvassed the scene at Tena Bar said:  that fragments of money were visible right on the surface ... which is what caused the agents to back up and devise a plan, which lead to these agents laying out a grid for the formal examination of the scene at Tena Bar.

With some luck, I and others now rehashing this story will present more as time goes on.

 :)


 

 



   

   
« Last Edit: November 19, 2014, 03:56:17 PM by georger »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #227 on: November 19, 2014, 04:16:59 PM »
Excellent post!

Even these statements counter any plant. why would fragments be around a plant. it still raises many questions.

1) If the dredge had something to do with it could the money have lasted that long.
2) What was the time frame of the flood in 78, 79. the month?
3) Why plant the money right on the surface, or even in that area?
4) Would fragments around the bundle be consistent with water levels lowering?

Snow found an article that claims a cannon ball went through the dredge. I'll post it later.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2014, 05:09:47 PM by shutter »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #228 on: November 19, 2014, 04:30:33 PM »
I've always been pretty confident money could get through the dredge, but the time frame is the killer. here is the article about the cannon ball.

Note: 1 fathom of chain is 6 feet!
« Last Edit: November 19, 2014, 04:33:44 PM by shutter »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #229 on: November 20, 2014, 12:38:10 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've always been pretty confident money could get through the dredge, but the time frame is the killer. here is the article about the cannon ball.

Note: 1 fathom of chain is 6 feet!

Snowmman did some searches on what can and cannot, pass through different types of dredges (pipes). I think it's fair to say Snow was of the opinion based on his research, that some money could have been sucked through the system of the dredge used at Tina Bar and survived to be spread both sides of each debris hump.

Tom and the FBI however, and this is important, focused in on statements made by the dredging company operator who stated that objects as large as a money bag, or lose bills themselves, could not  havre passed through the particular dredge machine used at Tina Bar.

I suppose the only way to solve this would be to test it!?

Let me reserve the rest until later.
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #230 on: November 20, 2014, 01:22:58 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Excellent post!

Even these statements counter any plant. why would fragments be around a plant. it still raises many questions.

1) If the dredge had something to do with it could the money have lasted that long.
2) What was the time frame of the flood in 78, 79. the month?
3) Why plant the money right on the surface, or even in that area?
4) Would fragments around the bundle be consistent with water levels lowering?

Snow found an article that claims a cannon ball went through the dredge. I'll post it later.

Frankly Dave, as I work this problem I'm not even concerned with "plant" vs natural means, etc. My concern is the evidence, facts, actual statements made and their meaning, ....... and conclusions-opinions can follow.

1- Could the single fragments have lasted that long, say from '74 until Feb of 1980. In a bacteria and oxygen free environment, theoretically yes. But that requires depth. The closer things get to the surface where oxygen, active bacteria, and higher seasonal temps are more available - the answer is no. Palmer then claimed that the upper active layer of sand is generally sterile; if true that suggests once fragments make it to the surface (say by erosion) they tend to be preserved then dry, weather, and falls apart as dust ... ? Keep in mind, everyone agrees that when the Ingrams found their money it was "soggy" to "wet". Both words are used in the several descriptions.

Now. Three agents swear that when A2 and A3 were digging a trench about 2o yards south of the Ingram find, intending to go to a 3-4 foot depth, they had no more than brought the first shovel of material up and dumped it, than they saw a 'fist-sized clump of what looked like wadded up decomposed money, a ball of rotted bills', which they called everyone's attention to, and it was bagged to be sent off for analysis. (This is before Palmer had arrived). This suggests that perhaps some of the money which was at Tina Bar had fully decomposed, in contrast to the Ingram bills found higher up in elevation and in the upper active sand layers vs. other money which was perhaps at a lower depth and closer to the water line?

I will have a lot more to say about this later because in fact agents were not proceeding blindly prior to Palmer;s arrival, they had a grid and were making a map, and keeping notes of things being found and placed into evidence bags - they literally ran out of evidence bags and called to be resupplied.     

2- one of the worst droughts in decades took hold by August of 1976 and lasted through all of 1977 finally breaking in January of 1978 with record flooding in some areas (Washougal flooding cited by Palmer). That was followed by more normal water level cycles through 1979 with a mini-flood in January of 1980 just before the money is found in February.

4- Would fragments around the bundles be consistent with water levels lowering (and changing)? A lot of people including Brian are of the opinion that the Ingram bundles are the source of any and all fragments found, no matter the location north or south of the Ingram find. The agents claim they found and mapped a debris field with definite limits running mainly south of the Ingram find, generally in a 4 to 6foot wide swath, with nothing beyond those boundaries and very few fragments north of the Ingram find. The normal inclination, imo, would be to classify the Ingram find as 'part' of the debris field ... like the head of a comet?"
 
 
« Last Edit: November 20, 2014, 01:37:44 AM by georger »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #231 on: November 20, 2014, 05:24:07 PM »
I'm going to email Kaye, but it appears that he only "speculates" the money had human intervention. I don't know what his exact words were in the book, but you must go by his website IMHO.

'we can speculate that he must have had some human interaction that could have eventually led to the money being buried on Tena Bar. How the Cooper bundles came to be buried where they were remains as big a mystery as who D.B. Cooper was."

I realize most of us don't believe in the plant theory, but I would like to have record of the event on here for people to see.

One thing I did notice was there seems to be a path leading from the road to the beach where the money was found. it appears to be the only obscure path in the area. just a thought? R99 pointed that out to me when I thought it was a drainage ditch.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2014, 07:39:09 PM by shutter »
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #232 on: November 20, 2014, 10:20:54 PM »
I talked with Brian Ingram directly at the 2011 Symposium about what he found at Tina Bar in 1980.  He said that after finding the money he and his family went looking for more money all over the beach and found none.

Brian told me they scoured the tide line and dug all over the place and didn't find a thing.

If my memory serves me, Brian also confirmed that he found the money under an inch or two of sand. It's raining, dark and cold, and I don't feel like digging in my storage area for my Tina Bar/Brian notes.

BTW:Can we please call the money beach Tina Bar? That's what the sign says at the beach gate, and I strongly feel that the use of the term "Tena Bar" is misleading and provocative, obscuring the possible relationship between the find and the fact of Tina Mucklow living about 20 miles away at the time of the money find.

As for FBI agents and what they saw/remember, etc, that is highly problematic.

Mike McPheters told me he was digging on the tide line with other agents and that he found a dozen or so shards at a depth of 1-2 feet.

Dorwin Schroeder told me that they found "thousands of shards" at all depths to three feet in an area radiating twenty yards from Brian's find.  Dorwin also told me that they found parts of DB Cooper's briefcase.

Carol Abracadabra told me that she found no evidence of the shards in the evidence box at Seattle when the Citizen Sleuths were doing their thing in 2010-2011. Nor did she find any documentation on the shards, their location, number, and any assessment of the find.

I've asked Ralph Himms by mail how he documented the money find, what it disclosed, and where that documentation is currently. Ralph declined to answer my request. However, Jerry Thomas called me several weeks later to say that Ralph had told him that the shards and documentation was sent to Seattle.

Galen says that Himms didn't do that immediately after the find, but delayed for some time.  Galen says that Seattle FO found out about the money find when they read about it in the Seattle Times.

I asked John Detlor, who was on the Norjak team at Seattle FO at the time and he said that they knew of the find in a timely fashion and that in fact agents from the Vancouver, WA satellite office participated in the dig at Tina Bar.

The Norjak case agent at the time of the money find, Ron Nichols, would appear to be a central figure in this discussion and be able to clarify many of these discrepancies. However, Nichols steadfastly declines to talk with me. I did talk with his neighbors in northern Seattle and was able to ascertain that Ron and his wife spend the winters down in southern California, hence explaining why Ron didn't answer the door when I knocked.

As for John Detlor, even though he is the primary author of the history of the FBI, he has declined to discuss this aspect of Norjak with me in any substantive manner.

This what I know of the money find. 

Georger, perhaps you could give me the names of the three FBI agents you talked with who said that they found a tangled, soggy ball of money. I would love to follow-up with them.

Nevertheless, the salient evidence that I have at this point is that the three bundles were found and everything else is speculative. I give great weight to Brian's statements in 2011 that there was no other money other than his three bundles to be found at Tina Bar in February 1980.

As a result, it begs the question: is the FBI lying? If not, then where is the documentation of what they found and the shards? Remember, the political pressure on the FBI to obfuscate Norjak may be great.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2014, 10:24:15 PM by Bruce A. Smith »
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #233 on: November 20, 2014, 10:29:29 PM »
Mr. Shutter:

"...One thing I did notice was there seems to be a path leading from the road to the beach where the money was found. it appears to be the only obscure path in the area. just a thought? R99 pointed that out to me when I thought it was a drainage ditch...."

Prince Bruce:

What obscure trail?  The dirt road from the Fazio's leads right to Tina Bar. I drove right to the beach. parked at the gate next to the Tina Bar sign and walked down the embankment to the spot that Al and Richard indicated was the spot where Brian found the money.

Then I went for a swim.  It was 103 degrees.  Current was pretty swift. 10 knots or so. Water was refreshing, though. Gal in a bikini did a lot of bending over the gunnels of her boat as she drifted by....
« Last Edit: November 20, 2014, 10:30:25 PM by Bruce A. Smith »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #234 on: November 20, 2014, 10:36:54 PM »
The Trail/dirt road seems to be away from other activity on T-bar. nothing more to be read into it really...

Quote
As a result, it begs the question: is the FBI lying? If not, then where is the documentation of what they found and the shards? Remember, the political pressure on the FBI to obfuscate Norjak may be great.

Seems to be more reason to see what Georger has?
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #235 on: November 21, 2014, 01:31:59 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I talked with Brian Ingram directly at the 2011 Symposium about what he found at Tina Bar in 1980.  He said that after finding the money he and his family went looking for more money all over the beach and found none.

Brian told me they scoured the tide line and dug all over the place and didn't find a thing.

If my memory serves me, Brian also confirmed that he found the money under an inch or two of sand. It's raining, dark and cold, and I don't feel like digging in my storage area for my Tina Bar/Brian notes.

There is nothing in the FBI notes that indicate the Ingrams did any further searching, although it wouldn't surprise me if they did. Their primary motivation after finding the money was financial - that is very clear and documented. One problem the FBI had giving them a reward was all previous rewards had expired. That included a reward NWA had offered. The money found belonged to either NWA (via  loan they incurred) or the insurance company Globe Ins.

On the issue of Brian's recollections, I don't know who or what to believe. I think the best authority on the Ingram's find may be Brian's mother and last I knew she is still alive but all questions to her have to go through Brian. The Ingrams are selective with who they will interact with.

BTW:Can we please call the money beach Tina Bar? That's what the sign says at the beach gate, and I strongly feel that the use of the term "Tena Bar" is misleading and provocative, obscuring the possible relationship between the find and the fact of Tina Mucklow living about 20 miles away at the time of the money find.

As for FBI agents and what they saw/remember, etc, that is highly problematic.

Mike McPheters told me he was digging on the tide line with other agents and that he found a dozen or so shards at a depth of 1-2 feet.

Dorwin Schroeder told me that they found "thousands of shards" at all depths to three feet in an area radiating twenty yards from Brian's find.  Dorwin also told me that they found parts of DB Cooper's briefcase.

Carol Abracadabra told me that she found no evidence of the shards in the evidence box at Seattle when the Citizen Sleuths were doing their thing in 2010-2011. Nor did she find any documentation on the shards, their location, number, and any assessment of the find.

I've asked Ralph Himms by mail how he documented the money find, what it disclosed, and where that documentation is currently. Ralph declined to answer my request. However, Jerry Thomas called me several weeks later to say that Ralph had told him that the shards and documentation was sent to Seattle.

Galen says that Himms didn't do that immediately after the find, but delayed for some time.  Galen says that Seattle FO found out about the money find when they read about it in the Seattle Times.

That is nonsense! The Seattle office, the agent at Vancouver, as well as others in law enforcement were notified almost immediately. I have direct confirmation on that from several sources. One of the first concerns was securing the site which included the road to the Fazio's. which was closed by LE almost immediately after meeting with the Ingrams at 9:30 Tuesday morning the 12th. The issue was who should it, a Deputy or an FBI agent ... people were very busy including several agents in Court, and finally mid-morning one FBI agent was pulled off his duty and sent to close the road to the Fazio's ... other agents and personnel were in action before noon...

I asked John Detlor, who was on the Norjak team at Seattle FO at the time and he said that they knew of the find in a timely fashion and that in fact agents from the Vancouver, WA satellite office participated in the dig at Tina Bar.

That is correct. I think they had already been put in the loop on February 11th after the first serial numbers had been called in and checked, before the meeting with the Ingrams the next day. Likewise other offices... FBI offices don't sit in limbo specially unconnected to Washington who then can advise appropriate parties elsewhere! Did Portland advise Vancouver and Seattle quickly? Yes.

The Norjak case agent at the time of the money find, Ron Nichols, would appear to be a central figure in this discussion and be able to clarify many of these discrepancies. However, Nichols steadfastly declines to talk with me. I did talk with his neighbors in northern Seattle and was able to ascertain that Ron and his wife spend the winters down in southern California, hence explaining why Ron didn't answer the door when I knocked.

As for John Detlor, even though he is the primary author of the history of the FBI, he has declined to discuss this aspect of Norjak with me in any substantive manner.

This what I know of the money find. 

Georger, perhaps you could give me the names of the three FBI agents you talked with who said that they found a tangled, soggy ball of money. I would love to follow-up with them.

Nevertheless, the salient evidence that I have at this point is that the three bundles were found and everything else is speculative. I give great weight to Brian's statements in 2011 that there was no other money other than his three bundles to be found at Tina Bar in February 1980.

I have never been told by an FBI agent that part of a briefcase was found. I have been told by agents there was a 'rumor of part of briefcase being found' but that rumor is attributed to press questions posed at the time, not to any agent saying this. Reporters were asking all kinds of questions and asking if particular items had been found in addition to money, especially as the excavation unfolded with 25+ agents/etc digging etc... 

Bruce you always push the conspiracy angle suggesting impure thoughts and acts on the FBI's part, as if all FBI offices and agencies are some monolithic beast acting out commands given by Magog, who resides in the larger Maldum Fornax, whatever in hell that is!.  :) The fact is, the Ingram find caught everyone by surprise. The looming question was 'where is Cooper and what happened to him', and the money became almost secondary at times to thought and concern over the larger question of Cooper himself and his fate. Had everyone been wrong and Cooper actually landed somehow in the Columbia then was swept down stream in his parachute then snagged on a wing dam and now his money is coming up with bottom dredging sediments taken in 1974? Answering that question is one reason Palmer was brought in (a high power geologist with impeccable credentials to judge the matter).  The issue of fragments probably became secondary.


As a result, it begs the question: is the FBI lying? If not, then where is the documentation of what they found and the shards? Remember, the political pressure on the FBI to obfuscate Norjak may be great.

my answers above in bold print.

In addition, we know that the bills the Ingrams turned in, in two segments on two different days, went by separate routes to Washington and then to Quantico in some fashion, with separate lab reports issued for the examination of each shipment. One rumor is the fragments and their bags also went to Washington by a third shipment, but those I have asked are unaware of any lab reports issued on the fragments, if they went on to Quantico for analysis also.

At some point the Court divided the bills between Globe Ins., the FBI, and Ingram. There is no mention of the Court doing anything with 'the fragments' if they existed as a separate body of property-evidence. Ingram was given his bills through Tosaw, the insurance company their bills, and the FBI kept it's assigned bills three of which are the bills Larry eventually sent Tom for analysis. Once again fragments are not mentioned in the inventory of property evidence. At length, Tom and Carol were handed a small envelope of "dust" and told here are the fragments! One agent has suggested tome that that envelope Tom and Carol were given contains nothing more than the dust from the original evidence folders each of the Ingram bills and bill-portions were kept in after the Ingram find, and has nothing to do with the socalled "fragments" Schreuder and others maintain they excavated from Tina Bar - and if that is true it is hilarious!  ;) ;) ;) ;)  I mean easy come-easy go! This whole thing gets more convoluted and inscrutable with each passing minute. Only Saint Peter could keep track of the comings and goings and who went where, how, and when, in the Labyrinth of Human Affairs.   ::)       

« Last Edit: November 21, 2014, 02:44:02 AM by georger »
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #236 on: November 21, 2014, 03:18:24 AM »
Thanks for your considerable reply, G.

A couple things:

1.  Any way I could communicate with the agents you mentioned a couple posts back? I'd like to hear more about the soggy bundle.

2. Conspiracy theories:

Well I agree with you - I sure see a lot of them, but I don't think I am distorting anything factual, and I am certainly not making anything up.  The critical issue is how to interpret the facts. To give the FBI a free ride in the Norjak case and accept everything they say as 100% truthful is not justified in my opinion.  There are just too many egos and images at risk due to inconsistencies and sloppy police work. Plus the potential exists for real, external pressure upon the Bureau to keep mum, such as might be the case if DB Cooper was SF, Delta Force, Seal Team Six or such. Such dynamics can not be discounted even when one loves the FBI, America, Apple Pie, etc....
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #237 on: November 21, 2014, 01:39:58 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thanks for your considerable reply, G.

A couple things:

1.  Any way I could communicate with the agents you mentioned a couple posts back? I'd like to hear more about the soggy bundle.

2. Conspiracy theories:

Well I agree with you - I sure see a lot of them, but I don't think I am distorting anything factual, and I am certainly not making anything up.  The critical issue is how to interpret the facts. To give the FBI a free ride in the Norjak case and accept everything they say as 100% truthful is not justified in my opinion.  There are just too many egos and images at risk due to inconsistencies and sloppy police work. Plus the potential exists for real, external pressure upon the Bureau to keep mum, such as might be the case if DB Cooper was SF, Delta Force, Seal Team Six or such. Such dynamics can not be discounted even when one loves the FBI, America, Apple Pie, etc....

I can provide this much -
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #238 on: November 21, 2014, 03:47:00 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thanks for your considerable reply, G.

A couple things:

1.  Any way I could communicate with the agents you mentioned a couple posts back? I'd like to hear more about the soggy bundle.

2. Conspiracy theories:

Well I agree with you - I sure see a lot of them, but I don't think I am distorting anything factual, and I am certainly not making anything up.  The critical issue is how to interpret the facts. To give the FBI a free ride in the Norjak case and accept everything they say as 100% truthful is not justified in my opinion.  There are just too many egos and images at risk due to inconsistencies and sloppy police work. Plus the potential exists for real, external pressure upon the Bureau to keep mum, such as might be the case if DB Cooper was SF, Delta Force, Seal Team Six or such. Such dynamics can not be discounted even when one loves the FBI, America, Apple Pie, etc....

How can you quote the FBI in certain points if you don't trust them? the things I'm reading could be considered a cover up, but also could be ignorance to some extent. much like some of the suspects we are now getting two stories for one! what reporter got this article completely wrong?

This is a similar path the FBI took while investigating the escape from Alcatraz. they concluded they all drown, no raft was found, and no crimes were committed the following day. the turned the case over to the US Marshal's in the late 70's. the current Marshal does the investigating on the side. he found two reports that conflict with the FBI's original statements.

1) Police report indicated a raft was found on Angel Island with foot prints leading away.
2) Police report was filed the next day claiming 3 individual 's stole a car.

I can see the FBI trying to cover up Alcatraz. it was suppose to be escape proof. lots of pressure was probably put on them. Cooper? I don't really see any reason to cover anything up. money all over the place could easily help them prove he didn't survive.  Alcatraz was owned by the very people who pay there checks. it was a Federal institution. Cooper was some guy with a wild idea. admission could be the sole reason for a cover up?

Thoughts?

« Last Edit: November 21, 2014, 04:00:33 PM by shutter »
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #239 on: November 21, 2014, 04:09:33 PM »
In general, I believe everybody until they prove themselves to be wholly unreliable. However, I hold everything in abeyance, with a pinch of salt always nearby. I call it living (and writing) in the "in-between," a place where someone in authority says something, but it is inconsistent with other findings. That doesn't make one right and the other wrong. Both may be in error, or both partially correct. The key is assessing the totality of the evidence.

In that I find the FBI to be very suspect. Their inconsistencies, lost evidence, and sloppy documentation continues to intensify the more we poke into the depths of Norjak. Is the FBI lying? I don't know. I'm just pointing out the possibilities.

The fact that a lot of FBI agents dodge me or spin their story is a major red flag to me. Why would Lee Dormuth tell me that he "wants nothing to do with it," meaning his sister-in-law Tina Mucklow and Norjak, yet he reads Tina's mail. Plus, his wife chats with Jo at length? Wassup wid dat?

They don't even do the simple stuff, like attending the symposia. Why doesn't Curtis Eng simply give me a call and say: "Here's the story, now cut the crap about cover-ups." ?
« Last Edit: November 21, 2014, 08:47:54 PM by Bruce A. Smith »