Poll

How did the money arrive on Tena Bar

River Flooding
1 (5%)
Floated to it's resting spot via Columbia river
2 (10%)
Planted
6 (30%)
Dredge
11 (55%)
tossed in the river in a paper bag
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Voting closed: August 16, 2016, 09:05:28 AM

Author Topic: Tena Bar Money Find  (Read 1345074 times)

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1905 on: February 07, 2016, 11:48:19 PM »
I typed in a time frame of 68-85....the years that popped up were 70, 71,73, 74, 75, 80, 86..


I was able to obtain better resolution then the photo's I posted a couple hours ago...
« Last Edit: February 07, 2016, 11:50:11 PM by Shutter »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1906 on: February 08, 2016, 12:01:49 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I typed in a time frame of 68-85....the years that popped up were 70, 71,73, 74, 75, 80, 86..


I was able to obtain better resolution then the photo's I posted a couple hours ago...

whats the url ?
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1907 on: February 08, 2016, 12:03:25 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I typed in a time frame of 68-85....the years that popped up were 70, 71,73, 74, 75, 80, 86..


I was able to obtain better resolution then the photo's I posted a couple hours ago...

whats the url ?






You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1908 on: February 09, 2016, 02:45:48 PM »
will post this under the money find :::::

Talked to SA Schreuder again so will give a brief update. Dorwin is firm that there were many-many fragments of money agents were seeing as they conducted their excavation at Tena Bar. He says agents were chattering back and forth about it, comparing notes as they worked the beach raking and turning over sand at the scene. He says most of these pieces were the size of a dime, a nickel, a quarter, and so forth. By the end of the excavation we decided not to be so open about this with reporters ...

We discussed the new book on Dorwin's career and the other hijackings Dorwin was involved with. This lead to a discussion about the categories of suspects the FBI considered primary suspects at the time, and locations that were examined as possible sources for Cooper evidence. Dorwin confirmed that the Eugene OR area was one of those locations examined closely. I won't go into the reasons why (we can get into that at another time), but in fact witnesses were shown a number of suspects from the Eugene area. None of the witnesses ID'd any photo as matching Mr. Cooper.

Dorwin says that McCoy was a top suspect. A number of agents felt that McCoy had had something to do with the Cooper hijacking and had knowledge about the case. He says McCoy network of people were investigated at length, in this regard.

I asked Dorwin how firm the FBI was, in the idea that Cooper had died in the jump. Dorwin said "not that firm - we really didn't know". Dorwin went on to explain that no tangible evidence had ever been found to decide the matter, many people thought he died, some people felt it was almost a dead-certainty that he died, but others contradicted that notion and "we really didn't know." Dorwin says that 'throughout this whole case we were always considering lots of options, all the options we could think of, nothing was ruled out unless there was evidence to rule something out, and we discussed every option anyone came up with'.

Dorwin says that by 1980 when the money was found at Tena Bar, the case wasn't cold but it was not a high priority, "kind of sitting on the shelf, we had so many other things to do." He says the dominant theory at the time was that the money had arrived on Tena Bar hydrologically, but 'we immediately hit a roadblock since there was no obvious tributary from the first dropzone near Ariel'. He says that's when the Washougal theory came into play due mainly to a change in Rataczak's testimony and because Palmer and a hydrologist identified the Washougal as the best hyrdrological source. He says the dredging theory was being discussed too.

He says 'yes, somebody suggested that the money discovery meant that Cooper had survived and traveled to the area where the money was being found'. Dorwin  says 'that got discussed but there was no easy way to test the idea'. He says that by 1980 memories had faded, there was an attempt to go back and look at old hospital admission and body reports, but since nothing of Cooper himself turned up at Tena Bar except for his money, the idea got shelved because there was no easy way to explore the idea.

Since Dorwin lived so many years at Portland-Vancouver he is very well acquainted with the area.  Dorwin confirmed the hobo camps and itinerates which populated both sides of the river at Portland-Vancouver in 1971-72, especially south-west of Vancouver proper, between the Columbia and the rail line north of this area. This rail line loops down just above Vancouyver from the Ariel-Amboy area north, flanks River Road, then loops back up north toward Seattle.  Dorwin agrees that if Cooper had wandered into this area with money, at night, looking for a way to get back across the river to Portland, Cooper almost inevitably would have been encountered by unsavory types who would have relieved him of his money and possibly his life also. That is why old body reports were searched (again) following the discovery of the Cooper money in 1980.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 02:50:45 PM by georger »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1909 on: February 09, 2016, 04:13:16 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
will post this under the money find :::::

Talked to SA Schreuder again so will give a brief update. Dorwin is firm that there were many-many fragments of money agents were seeing as they conducted their excavation at Tena Bar. He says agents were chattering back and forth about it, comparing notes as they worked the beach raking and turning over sand at the scene. He says most of these pieces were the size of a dime, a nickel, a quarter, and so forth. By the end of the excavation we decided not to be so open about this with reporters ...

We discussed the new book on Dorwin's career and the other hijackings Dorwin was involved with. This lead to a discussion about the categories of suspects the FBI considered primary suspects at the time, and locations that were examined as possible sources for Cooper evidence. Dorwin confirmed that the Eugene OR area was one of those locations examined closely. I won't go into the reasons why (we can get into that at another time), but in fact witnesses were shown a number of suspects from the Eugene area. None of the witnesses ID'd any photo as matching Mr. Cooper.

Dorwin says that McCoy was a top suspect. A number of agents felt that McCoy had had something to do with the Cooper hijacking and had knowledge about the case. He says McCoy network of people were investigated at length, in this regard.

I asked Dorwin how firm the FBI was, in the idea that Cooper had died in the jump. Dorwin said "not that firm - we really didn't know". Dorwin went on to explain that no tangible evidence had ever been found to decide the matter, many people thought he died, some people felt it was almost a dead-certainty that he died, but others contradicted that notion and "we really didn't know." Dorwin says that 'throughout this whole case we were always considering lots of options, all the options we could think of, nothing was ruled out unless there was evidence to rule something out, and we discussed every option anyone came up with'.

Dorwin says that by 1980 when the money was found at Tena Bar, the case wasn't cold but it was not a high priority, "kind of sitting on the shelf, we had so many other things to do." He says the dominant theory at the time was that the money had arrived on Tena Bar hydrologically, but 'we immediately hit a roadblock since there was no obvious tributary from the first dropzone near Ariel'. He says that's when the Washougal theory came into play due mainly to a change in Rataczak's testimony and because Palmer and a hydrologist identified the Washougal as the best hyrdrological source. He says the dredging theory was being discussed too.

He says 'yes, somebody suggested that the money discovery meant that Cooper had survived and traveled to the area where the money was being found'. Dorwin  says 'that got discussed but there was no easy way to test the idea'. He says that by 1980 memories had faded, there was an attempt to go back and look at old hospital admission and body reports, but since nothing of Cooper himself turned up at Tena Bar except for his money, the idea got shelved because there was no easy way to explore the idea.

Since Dorwin lived so many years at Portland-Vancouver he is very well acquainted with the area.  Dorwin confirmed the hobo camps and itinerates which populated both sides of the river at Portland-Vancouver in 1971-72, especially south-west of Vancouver proper, between the Columbia and the rail line north of this area. This rail line loops down just above Vancouyver from the Ariel-Amboy area north, flanks River Road, then loops back up north toward Seattle.  Dorwin agrees that if Cooper had wandered into this area with money, at night, looking for a way to get back across the river to Portland, Cooper almost inevitably would have been encountered by unsavory types who would have relieved him of his money and possibly his life also. That is why old body reports were searched (again) following the discovery of the Cooper money in 1980.

Georger, Thanks for the information.  This is exactly the kind of thing we need.

In my humble opinion, Dorwin's statements and the write up by Mike McPheters in his book, both describing the finding of many, many money fragments at Tina Bar, is enough evidence to conclusively answer the question.  Lots of money fragments were found at Tina Bar and that is the final and correct answer to that question.  Period. 
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1910 on: February 09, 2016, 04:39:01 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

In my humble opinion, Dorwin's statements and the write up by Mike McPheters in his book, both describing the finding of many, many money fragments at Tina Bar, is enough evidence to conclusively answer the question.  Lots of money fragments were found at Tina Bar and that is the final and correct answer to that question.  Period.

Ummm. Maybe not so "period." Where are the fragments, now? Until we know where the fragments are and how they got there, the issue is not locked down.

Also, if Mike is such an unimpeachable source, then why isn't he willing to talk about it?  His silence doesn't mean he lied about the fragments, only that the issue is a bit murkier than one would hope.

As for Dorwin, his whole testimony has to be considered. Where does the "briefcase find" fit in with his statements on the fragments? Does it lessen his credibility? Also, how about the 60-foot plume field that leads upstream? Plausible? Any explanations for it? Again, does it impact his credibility?

There is no question in my mind that Dorwin is a nice guy, and is to be praised for talking with us at such length. I certainly intend to take him up on his invitation to spend a day skiing with him at Big Sky in Montana. But even Dorwin has suggested to me that I take what he says with a grain of salt since his "memory might be off."
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 04:39:52 PM by Bruce A. Smith »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1911 on: February 09, 2016, 05:09:07 PM »
One thing we need for sure is better maps of 1980, and hopefully the news (kiro) still has footage from the chopper. they put the video on You Tube a year go.

Looking at the still photo from the chopper looking south. it appears they were digging further south than what can be seen in the video. I see three more area's (square) and a lot of footprints leading to another area further south.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 05:09:57 PM by Shutter »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1912 on: February 09, 2016, 05:52:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

In my humble opinion, Dorwin's statements and the write up by Mike McPheters in his book, both describing the finding of many, many money fragments at Tina Bar, is enough evidence to conclusively answer the question.  Lots of money fragments were found at Tina Bar and that is the final and correct answer to that question.  Period.

BRUCE:  Ummm. Maybe not so "period." Where are the fragments, now? Until we know where the fragments are and how they got there, the issue is not locked down.

R99 ANSWERS:  The fragments have absolutely nothing to contribute to this matter at the present time.  Where they are and how they got there is not of any significance today.

BRUCE:  Also, if Mike is such an unimpeachable source, then why isn't he willing to talk about it?  His silence doesn't mean he lied about the fragments, only that the issue is a bit murkier than one would hope.

R99 ANSWERS:  Mike has already written FBI reports (with money fragments bagged and attached presumably) on his activities at Tina Bar and also discusses those activities in his book.  His silence doesn't mean anything.  Maybe he is just tired of having to repeat himself for some people.

BRUCE:  As for Dorwin, his whole testimony has to be considered. Where does the "briefcase find" fit in with his statements on the fragments? Does it lessen his credibility? Also, how about the 60-foot plume field that leads upstream? Plausible? Any explanations for it? Again, does it impact his credibility?

R99 ANSWERS:  Does Dorwin make the original claim that a "briefcase" was found at Tina Bar?  In any event, Cooper's briefcase did not have anything to do with the fragments.  Also, did Dorwin make the original claim that a 60-foot plume field of fragments led upstream?

BRUCE:  There is no question in my mind that Dorwin is a nice guy, and is to be praised for talking with us at such length. I certainly intend to take him up on his invitation to spend a day skiing with him at Big Sky in Montana. But even Dorwin has suggested to me that I take what he says with a grain of salt since his "memory might be off."
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 05:53:07 PM by Robert99 »
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1913 on: February 09, 2016, 06:11:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
R99 ANSWERS:  The fragments have absolutely nothing to contribute to this matter at the present time.  Where they are and how they got there is not of any significance today.


Can I quote you on that, Robert? I find it a remarkable statement.
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1914 on: February 09, 2016, 06:39:57 PM »
Contour Map
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1915 on: February 09, 2016, 09:08:32 PM »
I believe if the amount of fragments did, or do exist, they are important to the money find. I'm puzzled to why they never released this information. they discussed the dredge theory, but didn't believe it with thousands of pieces being recovered? 

If the money was close by, how did thousands of pieces following along with the money?
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 09:12:04 PM by Shutter »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1916 on: February 09, 2016, 11:33:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
R99 ANSWERS:  The fragments have absolutely nothing to contribute to this matter at the present time.  Where they are and how they got there is not of any significance today.


Can I quote you on that, Robert? I find it a remarkable statement.

Indeed you may.  And in return, let me ask you a simple question.  Exactly what were you doing 36 years ago today?
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1917 on: February 09, 2016, 11:42:22 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Contour Map

Shutter, Do you have the dates for the contour map and the aerial map?  And what vertical datum was used in the preparation of the contour map?

Keep in mind that the contours on those maps are generally drawn by machines, not humans.  And those elevations on the map do look a few feet higher than I would have expected. 
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1918 on: February 09, 2016, 11:42:57 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
will post this under the money find :::::

Talked to SA Schreuder again so will give a brief update. Dorwin is firm that there were many-many fragments of money agents were seeing as they conducted their excavation at Tena Bar. He says agents were chattering back and forth about it, comparing notes as they worked the beach raking and turning over sand at the scene. He says most of these pieces were the size of a dime, a nickel, a quarter, and so forth. By the end of the excavation we decided not to be so open about this with reporters ...

We discussed the new book on Dorwin's career and the other hijackings Dorwin was involved with. This lead to a discussion about the categories of suspects the FBI considered primary suspects at the time, and locations that were examined as possible sources for Cooper evidence. Dorwin confirmed that the Eugene OR area was one of those locations examined closely. I won't go into the reasons why (we can get into that at another time), but in fact witnesses were shown a number of suspects from the Eugene area. None of the witnesses ID'd any photo as matching Mr. Cooper.

Dorwin says that McCoy was a top suspect. A number of agents felt that McCoy had had something to do with the Cooper hijacking and had knowledge about the case. He says McCoy network of people were investigated at length, in this regard.

I asked Dorwin how firm the FBI was, in the idea that Cooper had died in the jump. Dorwin said "not that firm - we really didn't know". Dorwin went on to explain that no tangible evidence had ever been found to decide the matter, many people thought he died, some people felt it was almost a dead-certainty that he died, but others contradicted that notion and "we really didn't know." Dorwin says that 'throughout this whole case we were always considering lots of options, all the options we could think of, nothing was ruled out unless there was evidence to rule something out, and we discussed every option anyone came up with'.

Dorwin says that by 1980 when the money was found at Tena Bar, the case wasn't cold but it was not a high priority, "kind of sitting on the shelf, we had so many other things to do." He says the dominant theory at the time was that the money had arrived on Tena Bar hydrologically, but 'we immediately hit a roadblock since there was no obvious tributary from the first dropzone near Ariel'. He says that's when the Washougal theory came into play due mainly to a change in Rataczak's testimony and because Palmer and a hydrologist identified the Washougal as the best hyrdrological source. He says the dredging theory was being discussed too.

He says 'yes, somebody suggested that the money discovery meant that Cooper had survived and traveled to the area where the money was being found'. Dorwin  says 'that got discussed but there was no easy way to test the idea'. He says that by 1980 memories had faded, there was an attempt to go back and look at old hospital admission and body reports, but since nothing of Cooper himself turned up at Tena Bar except for his money, the idea got shelved because there was no easy way to explore the idea.

Since Dorwin lived so many years at Portland-Vancouver he is very well acquainted with the area.  Dorwin confirmed the hobo camps and itinerates which populated both sides of the river at Portland-Vancouver in 1971-72, especially south-west of Vancouver proper, between the Columbia and the rail line north of this area. This rail line loops down just above Vancouyver from the Ariel-Amboy area north, flanks River Road, then loops back up north toward Seattle.  Dorwin agrees that if Cooper had wandered into this area with money, at night, looking for a way to get back across the river to Portland, Cooper almost inevitably would have been encountered by unsavory types who would have relieved him of his money and possibly his life also. That is why old body reports were searched (again) following the discovery of the Cooper money in 1980.

Georger, Thanks for the information.  This is exactly the kind of thing we need.

In my humble opinion, Dorwin's statements and the write up by Mike McPheters in his book, both describing the finding of many, many money fragments at Tina Bar, is enough evidence to conclusively answer the question.  Lots of money fragments were found at Tina Bar and that is the final and correct answer to that question.  Period.

Dorwin says all of the fragments collected were taken to the Seattle office and the procedure there would have been to send them to the lab for processing, inspected and matched for parts of serial numbers etc., then archived in evidence.   
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1919 on: February 09, 2016, 11:59:28 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
One thing we need for sure is better maps of 1980, and hopefully the news (kiro) still has footage from the chopper. they put the video on You Tube a year go.

Looking at the still photo from the chopper looking south. it appears they were digging further south than what can be seen in the video. I see three more area's (square) and a lot of footprints leading to another area further south.

something going on there .. again this fits with Dorwin's statements that they canvased/searched the whole beach looking for any trail up to the money find, and beyond it. He says since they found more fragments south of the Ingram find than north of it, it was south where they did extensive raking and probing... as apparently confirmed by the KIRO vds ...
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 11:59:49 PM by georger »