Poll

How did the money arrive on Tena Bar

River Flooding
1 (5%)
Floated to it's resting spot via Columbia river
2 (10%)
Planted
6 (30%)
Dredge
11 (55%)
tossed in the river in a paper bag
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Voting closed: August 16, 2016, 09:05:28 AM

Author Topic: Tena Bar Money Find  (Read 1344907 times)

Offline nmiwrecks

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • MichiganMysteries.com
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1665 on: December 21, 2015, 11:45:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Sorry you are receiving so much scrutiny for you thoughts, but there have been so many kooks attached to the Cooper Case over the years that many of the people around here have become quite jaded.  Either that or they are "kooks" themselves!   :-*

NMI,

Just hang around and you will be in that same condition sooner than you imagine. :)
:)  I think I'm already there...   :)  Now read me the goddamn recipe for cherry cheesecake!   ;D
"If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got." - Henry Ford
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1666 on: December 22, 2015, 02:22:20 PM »
I am also looking at a 1976 dredge operation in Vancouver Lake..   since Lake River reverses flow money may have come from the North into Vancouver Lake..

Checking DZ and can't find any discussion about the 1976 pilot dredge operation described in this 1977 report.

A very interesting read, they deposited the material on shore (map) to condition before use but doesn't say where it ultimately ended up. It may have been moved later. It also describes it as sandy and or clay.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 

Offline nmiwrecks

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • MichiganMysteries.com
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1667 on: December 23, 2015, 09:45:31 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I am also looking at a 1976 dredge operation in Vancouver Lake..   since Lake River reverses flow money may have come from the North into Vancouver Lake..

Checking DZ and can't find any discussion about the 1976 pilot dredge operation described in this 1977 report.

A very interesting read, they deposited the material on shore (map) to condition before use but doesn't say where it ultimately ended up. It may have been moved later. It also describes it as sandy and or clay.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Is there anything we can do to help forward your theory?  Do you think Cooper survived the jump?
"If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got." - Henry Ford
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1668 on: December 23, 2015, 11:09:24 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I am also looking at a 1976 dredge operation in Vancouver Lake..   since Lake River reverses flow money may have come from the North into Vancouver Lake..

Checking DZ and can't find any discussion about the 1976 pilot dredge operation described in this 1977 report.

A very interesting read, they deposited the material on shore (map) to condition before use but doesn't say where it ultimately ended up. It may have been moved later. It also describes it as sandy and or clay.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Is there anything we can do to help forward your theory?  Do you think Cooper survived the jump?

I have been trying to get a handle on the hydrology at the Lewis River and Columbia convergence, Lake River is right there and when the Columbia runs high the flow is down into Vancouver Lake. Is it even possible for a float from the Lewis into Lake River??  There is also Salmon Creek watershed which would feed Vancouver Lake under a flow reversal condition. There was an extreme high water event for Vancouver Lake January 1980, look at the sign
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
and in 1977
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

After the 1976 Vancouver Lake pilot dredge operation, there was work done 78-82, the flushing channel part appears to be built after the money find.

There is a 1978 EPA study that outlines the Vancouver Lake project and recommendations,, large file, but one recommendation was no cutter head on the dredge in Vancouver Lake..  So, what was actually done in Vancouver Lake before the money find??

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
« Last Edit: December 23, 2015, 11:54:41 AM by FLYJACK »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1669 on: December 29, 2015, 01:37:12 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I am also looking at a 1976 dredge operation in Vancouver Lake..   since Lake River reverses flow money may have come from the North into Vancouver Lake..

Checking DZ and can't find any discussion about the 1976 pilot dredge operation described in this 1977 report.

A very interesting read, they deposited the material on shore (map) to condition before use but doesn't say where it ultimately ended up. It may have been moved later. It also describes it as sandy and or clay.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Is there anything we can do to help forward your theory?  Do you think Cooper survived the jump?

I have been trying to get a handle on the hydrology at the Lewis River and Columbia convergence, Lake River is right there and when the Columbia runs high the flow is down into Vancouver Lake. Is it even possible for a float from the Lewis into Lake River??  There is also Salmon Creek watershed which would feed Vancouver Lake under a flow reversal condition. There was an extreme high water event for Vancouver Lake January 1980, look at the sign
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
and in 1977
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

After the 1976 Vancouver Lake pilot dredge operation, there was work done 78-82, the flushing channel part appears to be built after the money find.

There is a 1978 EPA study that outlines the Vancouver Lake project and recommendations,, large file, but one recommendation was no cutter head on the dredge in Vancouver Lake..  So, what was actually done in Vancouver Lake before the money find??

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

If it is possible for debris from the Lewis to pass through Lake Road River, there would be examples of it. Something identifiable that started in the Lewis or even in the northern Lewis then was found ..in Lake Road River. Locals would know about that. The Fazios would probably know. I know Tom tried to connect the Lewis with a deposit at Tena Bar and you know what happened to that ... it's kind of humorous now but wasn't at the time. (The propeller Theory?)

As for Vancouver Lake as a source for the money, the strongest thing I can offer is 'silts from Vancouver Lake are known as "Vancouver Lake fine silts" sometimes called "Willemette fine silts", very small grained silts and geologically distinctive as compared with the beach silts/sands you find in the Tena Bar area. Slightly different geologies. I have reason to believe that the FBI did rather extensive lab work on the Ingram bills. Had they detected the fine grained silts associated with Vancouver Lake geology-hydrology vs the larger round sand type silt they found between the bills, Vancouver Lake would have been searched by the FBI as a possible source for Cooper's body and the money bag. In addition to that, Vancouver Lake is known for hosting species of diatoms - Tom Kaye saw no diatoms on his bills that were easily seen and no FBI lab report I have seen mentions diatoms either. However, you open up a line of inquiry that is worth pursuing for a number of reasons. That's just my personal opinion. I think R99 has reasons for believing that Vancouver Lake is not a likely source for the Ingram money.

On the subject of the Ingrams and a possible plant, I simply want to remind people that Brian Ingram is a member of this forum. By extension his family are members or would have reason to be concerned if their names were being associated with a plant hypothesis. A number of us are aware that more may be said on this subject down the road, next year, so it's not like the subject is going to vanish. Various plant ideas had been voiced before and likely will be advanced again in the future. I just ask a little sensitivity to this issue given that Brian and others read this forum, and frankly a number of us have discussed and processed this matter off line and do not feel the Ingrams were involved in a plant, real or hypothetical. If the Ingrams were not involved in a conspiracy to plant Cooper money at Tena Bar, I can see how they might be offended at the suggestion.  I hope I said this appropriately. (If I didn't I will hear about it!  :) )   
« Last Edit: December 29, 2015, 04:24:24 AM by georger »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1670 on: December 29, 2015, 04:52:59 PM »
Thousand of pieces of bills and part of a brief case, said Dorwin Schreuder:

Bruce's original account for Dorwin Schreuder is here, at Dropzone near the top of the page. It was followed by commentary.  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

In my original conversation with Dorwin, Dorwin never mentioned a brief case. After Bruce's post I called Dorwin and asked him about the 'brief case' mentioned in Bruce's post. Dorwin laughed and said, "It's only a rumor. I wasn't there when it was found, whatever it is".

Dorwin Schreuder was dispatched to the Tena Bar with instructions at about 9:00am on Feb 12, 1980. It took time for Dorwin to assemble tools and personnel and he arrived at the Fazio property at about noon on the 12th - the road to the Fazio property had already been closed by another Agent. Dorwin and two others began their canvas of the Ingram find site, they worked into the late evening, returned the next morning, and Dorwin left Tena Bar to return to other duties at about noon on Wednesday the 13th. Dorwin, so far as I know, was never back at Tena Bar and he was not present when the alleged 'part of a brief case' was found. That is the story Dorwin gave me.

There is a photo of what looks like part of a brief case. We discussed this before, briefly. Maybe Shutter or someone can recall the conclusions we came to regarding this object? 

       
« Last Edit: December 29, 2015, 04:54:31 PM by georger »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1671 on: December 29, 2015, 05:10:16 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thousand of pieces of bills and part of a brief case, said Dorwin Schreuder:

Bruce's original account for Dorwin Schreuder is here, at Dropzone near the top of the page. It was followed by commentary.  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

In my original conversation with Dorwin, Dorwin never mentioned a brief case. After Bruce's post I called Dorwin and asked him about the 'brief case' mentioned in Bruce's post. Dorwin laughed and said, "It's only a rumor. I wasn't there when it was found, whatever it is".

Dorwin Schreuder was dispatched to the Tena Bar with instructions at about 9:00am on Feb 12, 1980. It took time for Dorwin to assemble tools and personnel and he arrived at the Fazio property at about noon on the 12th - the road to the Fazio property had already been closed by another Agent. Dorwin and two others began their canvas of the Ingram find site, they worked into the late evening, returned the next morning, and Dorwin left Tena Bar to return to other duties at about noon on Wednesday the 13th. Dorwin, so far as I know, was never back at Tena Bar and he was not present when the alleged 'part of a brief case' was found. That is the story Dorwin gave me.

There is a photo of what looks like part of a brief case. We discussed this before, briefly. Maybe Shutter or someone can recall the conclusions we came to regarding this object? 

     

That item is to big to be the type of brief case (or attache case) that Cooper reportedly had.  It also appears to be in excellent condition which it wouldn't be if it had been exposed to mother nature and flooding for more than 8 years.  My guess is that it was an equipment case for whatever and belonged to the FBI.  Additionally, note that it has been put in a "protective" location adjacent to the tree trunk.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2015, 07:28:18 PM by Shutter »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1672 on: December 29, 2015, 07:25:04 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thousand of pieces of bills and part of a brief case, said Dorwin Schreuder:

Bruce's original account for Dorwin Schreuder is here, at Dropzone near the top of the page. It was followed by commentary.  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

In my original conversation with Dorwin, Dorwin never mentioned a brief case. After Bruce's post I called Dorwin and asked him about the 'brief case' mentioned in Bruce's post. Dorwin laughed and said, "It's only a rumor. I wasn't there when it was found, whatever it is".

Dorwin Schreuder was dispatched to the Tena Bar with instructions at about 9:00am on Feb 12, 1980. It took time for Dorwin to assemble tools and personnel and he arrived at the Fazio property at about noon on the 12th - the road to the Fazio property had already been closed by another Agent. Dorwin and two others began their canvas of the Ingram find site, they worked into the late evening, returned the next morning, and Dorwin left Tena Bar to return to other duties at about noon on Wednesday the 13th. Dorwin, so far as I know, was never back at Tena Bar and he was not present when the alleged 'part of a brief case' was found. That is the story Dorwin gave me.

There is a photo of what looks like part of a brief case. We discussed this before, briefly. Maybe Shutter or someone can recall the conclusions we came to regarding this object? 

     

That item is to big to be the type of brief case (or attache case) that Cooper reportedly had.  It also appears to be in excellent condition which it wouldn't be if it had been exposed to mother nature and flooding for more than 8 years.  My guess is that it was an equipment case for whatever and belonged to the FBI.  Additionally, note that it has been put in a "protective" location adjacent to the tree trunk.


Yes, we checked the photo out, and verified it was photo equipment that the FBI, or media had on the beach. there is two cases in the photo...


Sorry R99, if you noticed, I posted my photo on your post. that's why you will see I edited your post....I removed it and put it on my post as intended...
« Last Edit: December 29, 2015, 07:31:12 PM by Shutter »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1673 on: December 30, 2015, 12:17:52 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thousand of pieces of bills and part of a brief case, said Dorwin Schreuder:

Bruce's original account for Dorwin Schreuder is here, at Dropzone near the top of the page. It was followed by commentary.  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

In my original conversation with Dorwin, Dorwin never mentioned a brief case. After Bruce's post I called Dorwin and asked him about the 'brief case' mentioned in Bruce's post. Dorwin laughed and said, "It's only a rumor. I wasn't there when it was found, whatever it is".

Dorwin Schreuder was dispatched to the Tena Bar with instructions at about 9:00am on Feb 12, 1980. It took time for Dorwin to assemble tools and personnel and he arrived at the Fazio property at about noon on the 12th - the road to the Fazio property had already been closed by another Agent. Dorwin and two others began their canvas of the Ingram find site, they worked into the late evening, returned the next morning, and Dorwin left Tena Bar to return to other duties at about noon on Wednesday the 13th. Dorwin, so far as I know, was never back at Tena Bar and he was not present when the alleged 'part of a brief case' was found. That is the story Dorwin gave me.

There is a photo of what looks like part of a brief case. We discussed this before, briefly. Maybe Shutter or someone can recall the conclusions we came to regarding this object? 

     

That item is to big to be the type of brief case (or attache case) that Cooper reportedly had.  It also appears to be in excellent condition which it wouldn't be if it had been exposed to mother nature and flooding for more than 8 years.  My guess is that it was an equipment case for whatever and belonged to the FBI.  Additionally, note that it has been put in a "protective" location adjacent to the tree trunk.


Yes, we checked the photo out, and verified it was photo equipment that the FBI, or media had on the beach. there is two cases in the photo...


Sorry R99, if you noticed, I posted my photo on your post. that's why you will see I edited your post....I removed it and put it on my post as intended...

Good. That's out of the way. Thanks R99 and Shutter. I guess the next thing to do is put Dorwin's remarks to Bruce and me into the perspective of the total excavation at Tena Bar. Shutter, we went over part of this before using your good eyes and press photos of the excavation. What we need is a calibrated map/chart of Tena Bar - something we could place Dorwin's evidence on, dig photo positions on, and whatever else for a better picture of the whole excavation. Maybe I can come up with a calibrated isophote graphic of Tena Bar, using one of Tom's charts ??? 

[one eye doing this the other on the tv: Texas Tech 27 LSU 42. A wild game so far. 9:35 in the 4th.] make that 49 to 27. The game has changed every second since it started!
« Last Edit: December 30, 2015, 12:24:05 AM by georger »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1674 on: December 30, 2015, 02:39:43 PM »
I am moving three crucial Bruce Smith posts about Dorwin Schreuder and the Tina Bar money find, here ... because they were posted in another thread. If you were searching for these money find posts you would never find them here in the Tina Bar Thread! Now you can find them here.

.......................................................................

Re: New Forum & News Updates
« Reply #1157 on: December 16, 2015, 10:32:09 PM »
•   Quote
Just had a lovely chat with Dorwin. Among other things, I encouraged him to check out this forum.

He shed a little more light on the money retrieval at T-Bar. "We weren't as prepared as we should have been," he told me, explaining that the money shards they found were placed in whatever envelopes and baggies that were handy.  "Some agents had miniature crime kits," which was one of the means of preserving the fragments.

Dorwin also told me that Seattle agents were on the scene, with one agent from the Vancouver satellite office arriving first, and then the following day a contingent of agents from Seattle arrived, and all the evidence was turned over to them.

 Bruce A. Smith
•   Hero Member
•        
•   Posts: 1075
•   
o   
o   
o   
o   
 
Re: New Forum & News Updates
« Reply #1159 on: December 17, 2015, 01:46:25 AM »
•   Quote
Dorwin said that 50% of fragments were the size of a quarter, and claimed, " it was not possible to retrieve all the little pieces. (There was) no evidentiary value."

My understanding of the "miniature crime kits," is that they were comparable to a pocket-sized first aid kit - a few baggies, a pair of latex gloves, a pair of tweezers, a couple swabs. Things like that. What would most special agents have in the trunk of their cars?
« Last Edit: December 17, 2015, 04:08:38 AM by Bruce A. Sm

 Bruce A. Smith
•   Hero Member
•        
•   Posts: 1075
•   
o   
o   
o   
o   
 
Re: New Forum & News Updates
« Reply #1167 on: December 20, 2015, 07:00:57 PM »
•   Quote
Thousands, according to Dorwin when I first spoke with him in 2011 (?) Equally scattered throughout the sand column to a depth of at least three feet, and radiating out 20 yards from the spot where Brian found/made/planted/created history.

Dorwin also said that they found one-third of the briefcase. No bomb materials, though. I have no confirmation on this latter bit, none whatesoever.

« Last Edit: December 30, 2015, 02:40:57 PM by georger »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1675 on: December 31, 2015, 03:27:25 AM »
I am going to post a condensed verbatim version of Bruce's original interview with Dorwin Schreuder, Bruce posted at Dropzone in 2010. This can serve as a reference for future questions concerning the Tena Bar find, Schreuder, etc.


BruceSmith

Jan 17, 2010, 10:04 PM
Post #15853 of 58140 (53112 views)
Shortcut
          Re: [snowmman] Dorwin L. Schreuder FBI, alive? maybe bruce can interview [In reply to]
 
________________________________________
In reply to:
The article I posted that named Schreuder as the agent "in charge" of the beach search, and making the "3 feet down" comment, spelled his first name wrong.

Notes, Dorwin Schreuder, Interview January 17, 2010
8 pm, Sunday, January 16, 2009

In a delightful two-hour phone conversation, I learned that Dorwin Schreuder was the FBI agent who took over the Portland office’s Norjak case from Ralph Himmelsbach when Himms retired in 1979.

Dorwin supervised the evidence retrieval operation at Tina’s Beach, although he was not the first FBI agent to arrive on the scene, which he believes was actually the field office agent from Vancouver, WA. He recalls getting a call to go out to Tina’ Beach and “bring lots of rakes and shovels.”

His Portland Public Information Officer (PIO) Billie Williams also called to say that he couldn’t make it to the site to handle the press and asked Dorwin to act as PIO for this portion of the investigation. Dorwin agreed and ultimately became the PIO for the Portland Office.

“There were a ton of media out there for days,” Dorwin said, referring to the scene at Tina’s Beach.

When they started, they visualized an informal grid pattern, radiating out for twenty yards from where Brian Ingram found the money and all the way down to the water.

“We went at it like archeologists,” Dorwin said, explaining that they preferred not using any heavy equipment initially. The usage of backhoes was much later in the retrieval.

In that initial search they found “thousands of teeny shards of money the size of a man’s fingernail, up to the size of a silver dollar.”

Dorwin said the pieces were well-preserved and layered in clean sand.

“No matter how deep we dug we found money – homogeneously mixed to a great depth.”

Dorwin said that most agents were digging at a depth of 1.5-2 feet deep and that they dug at least four holes “at least four deep.” He said they found shards in most holes and evenly placed all the way to the depth of four feet.

Dorwin also said that the dredger “Bedell” was parked off-shore in the Columbia, and he concluded as self-evident that the money had been shredded by the dredge and thrown up on the beach as part of deposition of material.

Outside of the 20-yard circle the shard finds diminished. Then they brought in the backhoes, but did not find any more shards of money.

However, Dorwin also said that they found “part of the leather briefcase – enough to contain the bundle that the little boy found (Brian Ingram).”

Dorwin continued to talk about the briefcase throughout our conversation, mentioning it several times, and specifically said that the portion they had retrieved was “about a third to half of the briefcase.”

At the end of our chat, I asked him if he was sure about the briefcase find, as I had never heard anyone else say that it was part of the findings at Tina’s Beach – or anywhere else.

He insisted on his statement.

When I told him that I had thought the money was tied up in a cloth satchel from the bank, he paused, and then very soberly said, “Hmmm, you’re beginning to make me doubt myself.”

We talked a bit more about this, and Dorwin confirmed that he was not at the site when the briefcase was found, since only the Ingrams were there, but, in addition, he had never actually handled the briefcase – or any of the evidence – at any point in the case.

He was a little hazy about the actions of the Seattle office, and when I asked him initially about the activities of the Seattle guys, he said, “Oh, yeah, they were involved,” but when I pressed him on how many, their names, and exactly what they did, he backed off and claimed that maybe it was only the Vancouver office agents that actually came on site and handled the evidence.

Dorwin believes that all the evidence ended up in Seattle. He thought that some of it was in the Portland office, too, for a time.

I asked him about the relationship between himself and the Seattle office, particularly with SAC Seattle Charlie Farrell, when Dorwin was the case officer for Norjak in Portland, he seemed to become a bit vague, but left me with the impression that he was confirming that Farrell was still SAC.

Dorwin was the Norjak case officer until his retirement, and his involvement with the case was minimal in the latter years. However, in the early 80s, he got about six strong leads a year and plenty of “wannabes” to check out.

The Norjak case file in Portland is enormous. Its shelf spans an entire wall.

“A lot of good work was done on that case.”

Dorwin believes that Cooper never survived the jump and “augured” somewhere, and the animals of the forest disposed of the remains. He believes that the money, “protected by the briefcase” made its way to the Columbia and got chewed up by the dredge and deposited at Tina’s Beach.

His voice had a trace of uncharacteristic frustration when he said, “We never found a thing, other than what was recovered at the beach.”

Dorwin also told me about his experiences negotiating with three different skyjackers. Dorwin has a Master’s Degree in Behavioral Sciences, and sounds like he was a superb negotiator.





« Last Edit: December 31, 2015, 03:29:12 AM by georger »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1676 on: December 31, 2015, 03:31:17 AM »
Question for Bruce Smith when he is back:

Q:  How did Dorwin think the Ingram money had come to Tena Bar, based on his firsthand observations ?

 

Offline nmiwrecks

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • MichiganMysteries.com
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1677 on: December 31, 2015, 10:00:41 AM »
This is very interesting.  If the agent's memory is correct, then his description of the condition of the money drives a wooden stake through the heart of the "plant" theory.  If the fragments were spread out like he said, that would be consistent with going through a dredger and/or being spread out by earth moving machinery. 
"If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got." - Henry Ford
 

Offline andrade1812

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
  • Thanked: 144 times
    • My Website
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1678 on: January 01, 2016, 07:03:37 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
This is very interesting.  If the agent's memory is correct, then his description of the condition of the money drives a wooden stake through the heart of the "plant" theory.  If the fragments were spread out like he said, that would be consistent with going through a dredger and/or being spread out by earth moving machinery.

It's really nice to have Dorwin's testimony, and I actually prefer the dredge theory, but all the evidence seems to run contrary. Larry Carr never produced anything more than a tablespoon of money fragments. A renowned geologist, who was there at the dig, said the money did not arrive via a dredge. Tom Kaye's analysis suggests the money was found outside of the dredge spoils. And if I remember right, there's four or five different versions of the "debris field" ranging from the fragments being produced by the Ingrams removing the money from the ground, to a small amount along "the tide line" to Dorwin's above description, to a massive field going three feet deep (through three different layers of sand) and being thirty feet in diameter.

As for the briefcase, there is no photograph of it, no one else talks about it, Carr never produced it and Cooper was not seen putting money into his briefcase (especially considering the briefcase was serving an entirely different purpose throughout the hijacking, as the bomb container). The briefcase found on the bar may just be some junk not related to the Cooper case, but if it had been saved, I think it would have gone a long way in dating the sand layer (if it showed evidence of being chopped up by a dredge, then it would prove both the experts wrong).
 

Offline nmiwrecks

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • MichiganMysteries.com
Re: Tina Bar Money Find
« Reply #1679 on: January 02, 2016, 10:10:16 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
This is very interesting.  If the agent's memory is correct, then his description of the condition of the money drives a wooden stake through the heart of the "plant" theory.  If the fragments were spread out like he said, that would be consistent with going through a dredger and/or being spread out by earth moving machinery.

It's really nice to have Dorwin's testimony, and I actually prefer the dredge theory, but all the evidence seems to run contrary. Larry Carr never produced anything more than a tablespoon of money fragments. A renowned geologist, who was there at the dig, said the money did not arrive via a dredge. Tom Kaye's analysis suggests the money was found outside of the dredge spoils. And if I remember right, there's four or five different versions of the "debris field" ranging from the fragments being produced by the Ingrams removing the money from the ground, to a small amount along "the tide line" to Dorwin's above description, to a massive field going three feet deep (through three different layers of sand) and being thirty feet in diameter.

As for the briefcase, there is no photograph of it, no one else talks about it, Carr never produced it and Cooper was not seen putting money into his briefcase (especially considering the briefcase was serving an entirely different purpose throughout the hijacking, as the bomb container). The briefcase found on the bar may just be some junk not related to the Cooper case, but if it had been saved, I think it would have gone a long way in dating the sand layer (if it showed evidence of being chopped up by a dredge, then it would prove both the experts wrong).
I look at Palmer's  and Kaye's interpretation of the site as opinions, not evidence.  Do I think they could be wrong?  Yes I do.  I lean more towards that than I do "Kenny buried it" or "D-Web threw a bag in a river".  I'm writing off the briefcase discovery.  Maybe Dorwin is projecting another crime scene on top of this one? 

The main question the money find could help answer is did Cooper survive the jump?  Unfortunately, the circumstances of the money's discovery   do not help answer that question definitively. 
"If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got." - Henry Ford