Just a general comment about this discussion here. I have not seen anything that leads me to believe the Cooper suspect did NOT land in the Columbia River, and the ransom along with him (maybe not attached to him, though). As more information becomes available, and we discuss and analyse the money find here, it becomes obvious that the idea he landed elsewhere is based on the supposition and conjecture of others which has NOT lead to the resolution of this mystery.
Could the Cooper suspect have survived the jump if he landed on dry land? Possibly. Could the Cooper suspect have escaped, stocking footed, with all his gear, or after successfully hiding a deployed main chute, dummy reserve chute, and a briefcase with a dummy bomb? Extremely unlikely. Especially considering the notoriety of the event, courtesy of the media of the day. Everybody in the Pacific Northwest would have been looking for him.
The problem with this case is there is very little concrete information to go on. That opens the door to all types of supposition and conjecture (see above

), none of which has closed the case, and much of which has lead the investigation of this case astray.