Another thought on flares: they could have been a signaling device to folks on the ground. Perhaps the Eugene episode was a test to see how far ground teams could see them. I would assume they weren't too effective unless they were underneath the flare.
I have seen aerial flares as well as ground based flares from several miles away. Basically, the problem with the Janet claim of flares is that they would be above an overcast and cloud layers as far as Janet was initially concerned and Cooper would not be able to see them when they went below the overcast. If Cooper did not have flares with parachutes, and he didn't, then flares dropped from the airliner would be on the ground in about 40 seconds or maybe less.
There is really no purpose that flares could serve in the Cooper hijacking. They are just another Cooper myth.
Robert. Like your recent post discussing if Cooper knew where he was in the air...this one is debatable too...flares could have served many purposes, whether or not they were used is questionable, but to say it is a myth is pretty black and white. Examples. Flares could be used for a fake bomb. They could be used to start a fire on the ground for heat or to burn the evidence, especially if he jumped south of Portland. He could signal while descending. He could drop one before landing to light the area or see the ground. He could use flares to signal once on the ground. Many possibilities. My opinion is he likely had flares for the bomb and probably didn’t need them for anything else except to maybe signal if he was in distress on the ground (as in I’ll walk out on my own, unless you see a flare, and that means I’m hurt)
I must disagree with you on both the counts that Cooper had a good idea where he was and that the flares were of particular value to him.
On the location of the jump, Cooper only stated that he wanted to go to Mexico. But that was not possible with the aircraft configuration so he agreed to land at Reno to refuel. There was no actual discussion of the flight path going south. Cooper correctly stated that the aircraft could take off with the rear stairs down but unlocked so as not to prevent the aircraft from rotating during take off. The flight crew did not know that and argued with him. Cooper finally conceded the point just to get the flight headed south. But Cooper did not know the flight route that the airliner was taking after taking off.
There is no evidence that Cooper had a radio or any means to contact anyone on the ground or to determine the location of the aircraft as it headed south. The airliner was above an overcast and several additional cloud layer and Cooper could not visually see the ground. There is nothing to suggest that Cooper had an accomplice. It appears that Cooper intended to jump very soon after leaving Seattle but he had difficulties lowering the stairs which delayed the jump.
It is a given that Cooper was wearing a backpack parachute and had the money bag attached to the parachute harness or to himself (which would have bee a really bad idea). If Cooper jury rigged the missing chest pack parachute to the backpack parachute harness, then he was only compounding his problems. If Cooper also jury rigged the attache case (which contained the flares) to the backpack then his chances of a successful jump were essentially zero in my opinion. If Cooper needed some light source, then taking a simple flashlight would have been the ideal solution.
FULL DISCLOSURE: I have NOT been sucked into the Cooper Vortex. I do NOT consider Cooper to be a hero or even particularly intelligent. As I see it, the hijacking was poorly planned and that Cooper only made it to the point where he jumped due to a lot of good luck and cooperation from NWA personnel. I also think Cooper was a no-pull and died in the jump.