"perhaps" is not certain....just thought I would point that out...
You guys are way off on the height thing and making a grave error in logic, context and judgement. It makes me question (some of) your integrity.. The error is giving false context and too much credibility in Hahneman's FBI early suspect height. Nobody is changing Cooper's height << that is a strawman.
If Hahneman were confirmed 5' 9" to 5' 10" does that alone eliminate him from NORJAK? ANSWER = NO
Mucklow 5' 10" - 6'
Schaffner 6'
Mitchell 5' 9" - 5' 10"
Spreckel 5' 10"
Labissoniere 5' 10"
Gregory 5' - 9"
The argument is that Hahneman is exactly 5' 8" because of an early (BOLO) FBI suspect description, that is nonsense. WE do not know the source of it and therefore we do not know the context. Comparing that without context to the collection of NORJAK witness estimates is apples and oranges. The FBI number may have been an estimate, an error, a rounding number maybe it was 5' 8 1/2", from a relative or medical record. We have no context. The passengers said Hahneman was "perhaps 5' 10"..
For argument, let's assume it is from a medical record. When you get measured that is without variables shoes/socks and to the top of your head not hair. NORJAK witnesses did not measure Cooper's height without shoes/socks and less hair.. DID THEY
You can add and inch to inch and half with shoes/socks and hair added
that puts Hahneman's hijacker height between 5' 9" to 5' 10" right where his passengers did "perhaps 5' 10". << that is too close to Cooper to eliminate.
Anybody that claims they can eliminate Hahneman based solely on that unverified FBI suspect height should have their Cooper Sleuth credentials revoked.. (IMO)