Cratering at T-Bar
What I get from you, Robert and Georger, is that:
1. Flight 305 was west of V-23, most likely in the vicinity of T-Bar.
2. This can be determined because the flight transcripts from the FBI and FAA have 19 redactions, which makes them suspect in toto.
3. The plane - and Cooper and his money - must have been in the T-Bar area since the money was found at T-Bar, and the lapses in the documentation allow for that possibility/likelihood.
I'm with you so far, with a high degree of comfort. Am I understanding you correctly, so far? I hope so, but after this I start to squirm a little. Nevertheless, and moving on, what I hear you say is that:
3. DB Cooper and his money cratered somewhere very close to the money find site at T-Bar. At the very least, the money impacted within an eighth-mile square, or about 500 feet of the money find site - impacting first on land - and then hydrologically moving to the money find site. I assume that means some kind of flooding action that swept over the landscape where the money first landed, and then moving the money to its eventual discovery site about 40 feet up-beach from the Columbia River.
Am I understanding you correctly so far?
After this, I really twist and turn. But, I sense that you feel DB Cooper cratered because the money must have cratered to have deposited itself where it was found in 1980.
Am I correct in that understanding?
SO, are you claiming that the cratering of DB Cooper has nothing to do particularly with the parachutes, his whuffo status, wind-chill factors, a-symmetrical loads, bad luck, hypothermia, etc - or it might. I am assuming that you are saying that all that can be determined is that Cooper had to have cratered because the money had to have cratered to end up as it did at T-Bar, ie: wet, highly compacted, edges worn, no diatoms, rubber bands still maintained a degree of plasticity, bills had holes bored into them - presumably from aquatic creatures - and the bills were found aligned near-perfectly atop one-another.