Georger:  You have failed to answer the following:

"You have not answered the question "Why else would Sheridan Peterson lie to the FBI about his whereabouts in his phony alibi with the birth dates of both his children in different years (1970 and 1972) than Norjak (1971) and in Nepal unless he is DB COOPER?"

You would have to admit that Sheridan "is DB COOPER"

However, you can't bring yourself to use logic and only use naysaying instead. Too bad and so sad.

Bob Sailshaw
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I don't believe I've seen the proof of Peterson being here in the USA during the period he was supposed to be in Nepal, has this been shown before?

The proof that he was here in the USA and at the scene of the Crime in Portland is the DNA under the Stamps and Envelope flaps of the four letters

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

... If you can believe the Smith ideology, Mucklow became an emotional basket case, unreliable, and a virtual hermit evading the public while we know Schaffner got married and was having a solid social-emotional self-supporting life...

Ah, let the Muckow-Schaffner revisionism begin.

My "ideology" is based upon what authors, FBI agents, and Bill Rataczak told me about Tina's mental status.

1. Calame and Rhodes wrote that Tina's memory was so impaired by the mid-1980s that she would never be called upon to be a witness in Norjak should the skyjacker ever be apprehended and brought to trial.

2. Rataczak told me that when he was working with Richard Tosaw on his book, Tosaw had told him that Tina's memory had been wiped clean "like a white board." He further told me that Tina's ex did not know her whereabouts, nor phone number, nor the last names and contact information for Tina's sister and husband - the Dormuths. So, this "ideology" issue goes a bit deeper than just my opinion of one flight attendant.

3. Along those lines, Calame and Rhodes write that Tina did not remember the clip-on tie when they spoke with her in the 1980s. This adds to the fact that the FBI agents on the evidence retrieval team in Reno - Campbell, Ricks, Stousland, et al. had no memory of the clip-on tie, either. That means that by the late 1980s, none of the five principals who presumably encountered the clip-on tie in Reno had any memory of that event.

4. As for Tina and her fragile "ideological" state, she did enter a cloistered convent in 1980 and stayed there for 12 years. Afterwards, she stayed hidden for the next 25 years until Jo Weber, Galen, GG, and I discovered her whereabouts in 2010 or so. 35 years of silence is a lot of "ideology," wouldn't you say, G?

5. Tina's public appearance on the pages of the Eugene Weekly in 2012 is bogus in my opinion. The gal pictured in the Happening People section of the EW does not look like the Tina Mucklow I met in July 2011, as she has gained at least 50 pounds and is laughing. The Tina I met does not look like a woman who has laughed in a long time. In addition, when I spoke with Tina over the phone last year, she sounded as cranky as ever, and not the blithe spirit pictured as a Happening People.

6. Tina was a residential patient in a Gresham, Oregon health care facility in 1979, and presumably up until the time her sister and brother-in-law took her to the convent in the spring of 1980. She was not being treated for "ideological" reasons, I presume, unless you know something that I don't, Georger, about this subject.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

... If you can believe the Smith ideology, Mucklow became an emotional basket case, unreliable, and a virtual hermit evading the public while we know Schaffner got married and was having a solid social-emotional self-supporting life...

Ah, let the Muckow-Schaffner revisionism begin.

My "ideology" is based upon what authors, FBI agents, and Bill Rataczak told me about Tina's mental status.

1. Calame and Rhodes wrote that Tina's memory was so impaired by the mid-1980s that she would never be called upon to be a witness in Norjak should the skyjacker ever be apprehended and brought to trial.

2. Rataczak told me that when he was working with Richard Tosaw on his book, Tosaw had told him that Tina's memory had been wiped clean "like a white board." He further told me that Tina's ex did not know her whereabouts, nor phone number, nor the last names and contact information for Tina's sister and husband - the Dormuths. So, this "ideology" issue goes a bit deeper than just my opinion of one flight attendant.

3. Along those lines, Calame and Rhodes write that Tina did not remember the clip-on tie when they spoke with her in the 1980s. This adds to the fact that the FBI agents on the evidence retrieval team in Reno - Campbell, Ricks, Stousland, et al. had no memory of the clip-on tie, either. That means that by the late 1980s, none of the five principals who presumably encountered the clip-on tie in Reno had any memory of that event.

4. As for Tina and her fragile "ideological" state, she did enter a cloistered convent in 1980 and stayed there for 12 years. Afterwards, she stayed hidden for the next 25 years until Jo Weber, Galen, GG, and I discovered her whereabouts in 2010 or so. 35 years of silence is a lot of "ideology," wouldn't you say, G?

5. Tina's public appearance on the pages of the Eugene Weekly in 2012 is bogus in my opinion. The gal pictured in the Happening People section of the EW does not look like the Tina Mucklow I met in July 2011, as she has gained at least 50 pounds and is laughing. The Tina I met does not look like a woman who has laughed in a long time. In addition, when I spoke with Tina over the phone last year, she sounded as cranky as ever, and not the blithe spirit pictured as a Happening People.

6. Tina was a residential patient in a Gresham, Oregon health care facility in 1979, and presumably up until the time her sister and brother-in-law took her to the convent in the spring of 1980. She was not being treated for "ideological" reasons, I presume, unless you know something that I don't, Georger, about this subject.