Yes, I'm still here but have been busy in the hurricane industry. I've been contracted by a company I've worked for in the past to handle the permitting dealing with the city and meet the inspectors on jobsites to insure the job passes inspection. I was a little rusty when it comes to engineering and wind loads and had to hit the books to bring myself back up to speed.
The Historical Society reached out to me last week explaining they are busy building new exhibits. I also had to wait to hear from the new office manager who gives the okay with allowing the chute to be opened for inspection. I'm waiting for a response from them. If they agree, Bruce, I will need your assistance with help getting the job done. this will also be a good article for your website.
It sounds like they will allow this to happen. if so, I need Bruce to take the lead on what needs to take place. I will send all the information required to make things go smoothly. they will be very specific detailing the steps needed. once the green light is given I will call you during the process and email all the details.
I have reached out to them several times during the pandemic and was told to hold off until they open and the last email months ago was when they told me a new office manager was coming in and she gives the yes or no. she reached out to me last week and I responded. so, it's a waiting game.
Shutter
Shutter, it would probably be a good idea for a certified rigger to open the chute and determine what canopy is installed plus the appropriate serial numbers and other identifying data for the canopy, harness, container, and pilot chute. Also, lots and lots of pictures of all the items so that we can get this parachute nonsense finished. Perhaps the rigger could come online here and explain what he/she has observed.
While the rigger may or may not be agreeable to repacking the chute, I doubt very much that he/she is going to sign the repacking card of a 50+ year old parachute to indicate that it is serviceable. It will probably just be repacked and put back on display at WSHM.
It would be nice if a rigger on this site could be there to observe the whole process. Multiple witnesses reduce the possibility of misinformation. Perhaps EU could get Larry Carr to observe the whole process. Even if Carr is not packing heat and wearing his former badge, just everyone knowing that he is former FBI might increase the probability of the whole process being done correctly.