New Forum & News Updates

[EU]

Some have the need to convince others for confirmation, I don't. Others opinions are meaningless.

that doesn't really make sense or you would be doing this in private?

It may all come out one day

Robert Blevins will tell you something similar..

either he was Cooper or he wasn't..one way or the other the truth will come out..

Blevins has infected your brain, using it as smear to discredit me AGAIN doesn't fly.

I posted it as timestamp and to let everyone know that I have reached an investigative point that has convinced me of a solve. That was my goal, not to convince anyone else. The amount of work involved to pull all the info together into an organized doc would be crazy. Not interested.

Fair enough about not wanting to write a book or a white paper about the case.

That said, I'll ask five central questions that I believe any theory has to answer plausibly.

1) How did the suspect acquire his detailed knowledge about the Boeing 727?

2) How did the suspect acquire his knowledge about the parachutes?

3) How did the suspect acquire pure titanium, stainless steel, aluminum, and rare earth elements on his tie?

4) How did the suspect acquire his knowledge of the Seattle/Tacoma region?

5) What is the suspect's alibi during the time of the hijacking?

[FLYJACK]

Some have the need to convince others for confirmation, I don't. Others opinions are meaningless.

that doesn't really make sense or you would be doing this in private?

It may all come out one day

Robert Blevins will tell you something similar..

either he was Cooper or he wasn't..one way or the other the truth will come out..

Blevins has infected your brain, using it as smear to discredit me AGAIN doesn't fly.

I posted it as timestamp and to let everyone know that I have reached an investigative point that has convinced me of a solve. That was my goal, not to convince anyone else. The amount of work involved to pull all the info together into an organized doc would be crazy. Not interested.

Fair enough about not wanting to write a book or a white paper about the case.

That said, I'll ask five central questions that I believe any theory has to answer plausibly.

1) How did the suspect acquire his detailed knowledge about the Boeing 727?

2) How did the suspect acquire his knowledge about the parachutes?

3) How did the suspect acquire pure titanium, stainless steel, aluminum, and rare earth elements on his tie?

4) How did the suspect acquire his knowledge of the Seattle/Tacoma region?

5) What is the suspect's alibi during the time of the hijacking?

EU,
I see you as a fair person.. if you want to discuss more maybe in private..

but a warning,, you might have to change your theory.

EDIT: Most of those questions have been answered in previous posts..

[FLYJACK]

Back to NORJAK,,

Short of FBI forensics and based on more recently found evidence, I am boldly time stamping NORJAK solved Friday August 17, 2018 4:02 PM PST. The totality of evidence is overwhelming. I have hundreds of pieces of circumstantial and corroborating evidence and am 99% convinced this is solved.

At the highest level and due to National Security the FBI/FAA/CAI/State Department covered it up, that top level coverup began 6-8 months after NORJAK. The FBI won't and can’t (lost/poor DNA) use their forensics to solve this. Their objective is to maintain the PR narrative that Cooper died in the jump and was unsuccessful.

It was Hahneman. There is far too much info to adequately disclose and discuss at this place and time.



Sincerely,

FLYJACK

I embrace the Latin proverb "Fortune favors the bold." Therefore, I welcome those who plant a flag in the ground, make a proclamation and defend it.

I invite you to discuss the totality of your proclamation here...ridicule is certain to follow, but that's okay. Or, feel free to write a document and make it available. I, for one, enjoy a well-written argument and would like to read about your conclusions.

Cheers!

Flyjack, Recommend that you take EU up on his suggestion.

Sounds reasonable, but to do the argument justice it would take me a month or two of hard work to lay it all out. The goal was to solve this puzzle for myself, I have achieved that. It wasn't to write a book or waste time and energy convincing others. I have hundreds of pieces of information, the best stuff not disclosed here. There is more than enough to write a book, but I am just not interested.

I don't expect anyone to just accept my opinion without analyzing the same info I have. I wanted to be first to "plant the flag" eventually others will follow.

That silly remark is just a cop out.  You haven't planted a flag and you sound just like another blowhard.

Exactly, a perfect demonstration (among others here) of the toxic attitude that confirms my decision.

Some have the need to convince others for confirmation, I don't. Others opinions are meaningless.

It may all come out one day,

Flyjack, It has already come out that you don't know what you are talking about.  Your ignorance of the Cooper hijacking and everything related to it, and your determination to remain ignorant, is remarkable.

That is just your opinion which becomes less valid with every comment you make.

[EU]

Some have the need to convince others for confirmation, I don't. Others opinions are meaningless.

that doesn't really make sense or you would be doing this in private?

It may all come out one day

Robert Blevins will tell you something similar..

either he was Cooper or he wasn't..one way or the other the truth will come out..

Blevins has infected your brain, using it as smear to discredit me AGAIN doesn't fly.

I posted it as timestamp and to let everyone know that I have reached an investigative point that has convinced me of a solve. That was my goal, not to convince anyone else. The amount of work involved to pull all the info together into an organized doc would be crazy. Not interested.

Fair enough about not wanting to write a book or a white paper about the case.

That said, I'll ask five central questions that I believe any theory has to answer plausibly.

1) How did the suspect acquire his detailed knowledge about the Boeing 727?

2) How did the suspect acquire his knowledge about the parachutes?

3) How did the suspect acquire pure titanium, stainless steel, aluminum, and rare earth elements on his tie?

4) How did the suspect acquire his knowledge of the Seattle/Tacoma region?

5) What is the suspect's alibi during the time of the hijacking?

EU,
I see you as a fair person.. if you want to discuss more maybe in private..

but a warning,, you might have to change your theory.

Feel free to message me or contact me at: eric (at) the cooper case dot com .

Anything you convey will be held in confidence.

[Shutter]

Some have the need to convince others for confirmation, I don't. Others opinions are meaningless.

that doesn't really make sense or you would be doing this in private?

It may all come out one day

Robert Blevins will tell you something similar..

either he was Cooper or he wasn't..one way or the other the truth will come out..

Blevins has infected your brain, using it as smear to discredit me AGAIN doesn't fly.

I posted it as timestamp and to let everyone know that I have reached an investigative point that has convinced me of a solve. That was my goal, not to convince anyone else. The amount of work involved to pull all the info together into an organized doc would be crazy. Not interested.

Let me tell you something Fly...you don't know people as you think you do..Robert has jack to do with my comment...it was in reference to a similar comment most do that have suspects! do you want me to post others with suspects with the same tactic?

you better check the size of your britches...

nobody has brainwashed me...you got that!!!

[FLYJACK]

Some have the need to convince others for confirmation, I don't. Others opinions are meaningless.

that doesn't really make sense or you would be doing this in private?

It may all come out one day

Robert Blevins will tell you something similar..

either he was Cooper or he wasn't..one way or the other the truth will come out..

Blevins has infected your brain, using it as smear to discredit me AGAIN doesn't fly.

I posted it as timestamp and to let everyone know that I have reached an investigative point that has convinced me of a solve. That was my goal, not to convince anyone else. The amount of work involved to pull all the info together into an organized doc would be crazy. Not interested.

Let me tell you something Fly...you don't know people as you think you do..Robert has jack to do with my comment...it was in reference to a similar comment most do that have suspects! do you want me to post others with suspects with the same tactic?

you better check the size of your britches...

nobody has brainwashed me...you got that!!!

Then why use Blevins in your comment, at all..

The Blevins card is used to discredit. You have done it before, it is a pattern. A tactic.

My research has ZERO to do with Blevins.. making that association is dishonest.

[Shutter]

it was similar to what you said, that's why...I also EXPLAINED that I could show others if needed...how long do you wish to argue about this? should I start another thread....

[Shutter]

Tactic
an action or strategy carefully planned to achieve a specific end.

nothing personal about this word...it's one I use often..it's not meant to insult IMO..you have taken it that way several times..

you have insulted me several times..this was far worse than others for using that word!

[FLYJACK]

it was similar to what you said, that's why...I also EXPLAINED that I could show others if needed...how long do you wish to argue about this? should I start another thread....

"It may all come out one day" is a factual statement, I don't give a shit who also said something similar.

You know Blevins is a punch line. You brought in that association and associating my comment or anyones with Blevins is meant to discredit, that is the context. Repeating it suggests it is a tactic. If you don't realize it then maybe you need to check your your own britches.

In fact, I recall Kaye saying something similar about the explanation for the TBAR money.. should he be discredited with a Blevins association, NO, it is ridiculous.

.

[Shutter]

"It may all come out one day" is a factual statement, I don't give a shit who also said something similar.

multiple posts will contradict that statement....

[FLYJACK]

"It may all come out one day" is a factual statement, I don't give a shit who also said something similar.

multiple posts will contradict that statement....

Wrong.
It is factual, I used the word "may" not "will", you won't find anything to contradict it.

[Shutter]

"It may all come out one day" is a factual statement, I don't give a shit who also said something similar.

multiple posts will contradict that statement....

Wrong.
It is factual, I used the word "may" not "will", you won't find anything to contradict it.

I'm talking about this...

I don't give a shit who also said something similar.

[FLYJACK]

"It may all come out one day" is a factual statement, I don't give a shit who also said something similar.

multiple posts will contradict that statement....

Wrong.
It is factual, I used the word "may" not "will", you won't find anything to contradict it.

I'm talking about this...

I don't give a shit who also said something similar.

So what, I am sure many people have said something similar, what the hell does that have to do with anything. It is a banal statement that anybody can make even Tom Kaye.

[Shutter]

it's what started the whole thing..."the statement"

I referenced a statement made by others and you insulted me by saying I was "brainwashed"

again, do we need to open a new thread for this?

[FLYJACK]

it's what started the whole thing..."the statement"

I referenced a statement made by others and you insulted me by saying I was "brainwashed"

again, do we need to open a new thread for this?

You make no sense.. YOU used the Blevins association, not me. I didn't insult you, I was pointing out what you did. You see everything through some Blevinsonian lens.. you have done it before. If you think it is OK then by all means keep doing it.