)Hi, everybody,
Thanks to Shutter and Bruce again for the invite and getting me on the forum. No friends or family share my weird obsession with this case (though they are indulgent of it; it's not like I'm investigating best places to buy crack) so it's a joy to be among those who do.
I apologize for the babbling to come - I've been looking into the case off and on for about a year and a half with no one to share ideas with -thanks again to Bruce for being so accessible and patient with my questions. Many of you have studied DBC for much longer, some since 1971 perhaps, and I really want you to correct me where I'm off-base. I was 3 in 1971, and as I'm writing a FICTIONAL book about someone who meets DB Cooper now (might as well use these hundreds of hours of research for something) I would also appreciate anything anyone slightly older than me might remember about the general vibe and zeitgeist of the era. (When I watch Season 2 of Fargo, for example, I can FEEL 1979 again, a year I do remember. I'm aiming for that. I just remember a crap ton of macrame and my Mattel-o-Phone.
)
I'm not a scientist, but I do read puzzle mysteries almost exclusively and take a crack at writing them on occasion. My approach to the DBC case is all over the board from an investigative point of view:
1) As the witness descriptions vary wildly except in the matters of height, weight, and age (I give little credence to witness Robert Gregory, who misidentified the FA who spent the most time with Cooper and wasn't even sure where he himself was sitting), I take those 3 elements of the description as more or less accurate. These days I'm less focused on the PHYSICAL description of DBC than his speech patterns (does anyone else think his repeated use of "funny stuff/business" sounds like someone who's watched a lot of old movies IMITATING a criminal?) and mannerisms. (Slouching = perhaps not military? The fine mannerisms Tina described = white collar?)
Oh, by the way, I don't think "negotiable American currency", even if it came from DB, means he's necessarily Canadian. I'm Canadian and university educated, but that shit be high-falutin'.
It IS an odd thing to say; most Canucks I know would use something more like "unmarked US bills/dollars". It DOES sound like something a world traveler might say, or someone like Frasier. Anyone know where Kelsey Grammer was in 1971?
2) I do weird stuff to get in writing mode for my fiction piece, like surround myself with 1971 music/TV episodes. So you may find me using stuff I've seen on TV as reference points. For example, in the last Cannon I watched, someone had just pulled off a heist, and the 1971 screenwriter clearly had done some research into money laundering, as the criminal character knew the money was likely traceable. (This apparently has been common knowledge in the US since the Lindbergh kidnapping). The criminal says something to the effect of, "Relax, I can't spend it yet. Not in the US, anyway."
That backs up something I've wondered about the laundering if any of the money DID make it out of the drop zone. What if the money was laundered - all at once or over time - in a foreign country? (Canada and Mexico might be too close by.) I cannot believe that tellers all over the world have been inspecting bills furiously for 46 years for circulated DBC loot. Of course there were computers in 1971, but I don't think the fact that the loot never showed up on the radar means it never got circulated.
This kind of thing takes me off on tangents like finding out how money is taken out of circulation. And what I'm finding is, it largely isn't, exactly. It deteriorates to the point where it's no longer spendable. Yeah, if it ends up at a bank, it'll be destroyed - I don't know if the serial numbers are even noted as the main reason the bills would be unusable is because the essential data has been ripped or rubbed off. If DBC circulated the bills, the only ways you could find one now would be through an exceptionally lucky collector; if he hid some away and they're found; or somewhere on/under the ground near the drop zone. Most modern circulated US bills deteriorate faster than I'd have thought - 3.5 to 5 years. Taking into account that modern bills get shoved through ATMs and stuff, older bills may have had a slightly longer shelf life, but probably not by much.
PS I think it may have been georger who somewhere on this forum mentioned the crystallization (sp?) of the rubber bands around the found loot. Do you think that might indicate that the place where the bills were found is the place where they reached that condition? Otherwise (ie. if moved by natural forces), wouldn't whatever force moved them have cause the rubber bands to break away just as the Ingrams' first (likely ginger) contact with the bills did? Oh, and if any of the Citizen Sleuths are on here - outstanding research at Tena Bar. I think the dredge theory is out.
3) I do have a favourite suspect, and a second favourite, however I acknowledge upfront DBC may well have died in the jump (THE THOUGHT OF SOMEONE FINDING HIS BODY MAKES ME PHYSICALLY ILL, THOUGH
) I don't like accusing people with real lives/families of crimes they may not have committed, so ANYTHING I say about my faves is said with the caveat of "100% conjecture" or, where possible, in light of provable facts.
4) I'm careful of confirmation bias, though not unwilling to explore weird coincidences like the murder of Cossey, Linn Emerick giving one suspect the go-ahead to try a "batwing" dive (forget the proper term for those) several years before - stuff like that. I'm not big on the idea of accomplices myself - I've been a broke chick bigtime, but would have needed way more than $100,000 or less to risk a felony sentence even adjusted for 2017, though of course there are those who would do it for far less. Still. I kind of think accomplices would have meant a larger ransom demand. He who carries the bomb calls the tune. And he's buying a stairway to heaven. (Led Zep, 1971, anonymous album. COINCIDENZA?!
)
I'm gonna sign off my long intro here. My recent obsessions have been (a) the bags seen by House, Mitchell and Mucklow and what they may have contained. Any ideas on that are conjecture; still, there are only so many things that would have been USEFUL to DBC and we can probably assume he only brought stuff he thought he'd need and (b) those damn letters, which until recently I dismissed, and came back to NOT because of the fifth letter's much-ballyhooed release. (The investigator ballyhooing it is championing a suspect I don't buy, but I do have a long winded explanation as to why I returned to the letters.)
Anyhoo, I want to read more of what's already written here before I throw out much more for general dissection. But any thoughts any of you have on any of the above - and any hazy memories of 1971, the year that was, would be very much appreciated.
Hope you're all having a peaceful holiday run-up and flying friendly skies.
Lynn