New Forum & News Updates

[377]

Uh oh, a 2 class system is emerging. Well, actually 3 class because we have 2 on the forum and 1 banned (Jo, Blevins, etc). When you are the piper you get to call the tune though. Carry on Shutter, The trains do run on time here. 

Happy 2017 to all 3 classes.

377

[Shutter]

Uh oh, a 2 class system is emerging. Well, actually 3 class because we have 2 on the forum and 1 banned (Jo, Blevins, etc). When you are the piper you get to call the tune though. Carry on Shutter, The trains do run on time here. 

Happy 2017 to all 3 classes.

377

This has nothing to do with hiding anything. emails between 4 people start getting confusing. this is the best answer to getting the proper communication for the project. are you implying we should produce our emails to get around this path?

[Shutter]

Jo and Blevins have nothing to do with this forum. Jo is perfectly fine where she stands with things, the other guy has nothing but hateful comments that have been running since 2014. he's been screaming a long time, but nobody hears his screams other than us.

[Shutter]

Why do you constantly feel the need to stick up for people who have caused a lot of trouble in the past? why are you not screaming when Robert does things like closing the public out on a public forum? what about the others who have been banned here, why are they missing in your level playing field?

Robert doesn't control me, or this forum. you seem to think he is a Cooper administrator of some sort? did he get the short end of the stick somehow?

Please explain since you brought this into the light...

[377]

I just like inclusion Shutter. It's that simple. You could constrauct a partitioned forum where the banned users could post in their own corner. It would save time and eliminate the need to visit the outskirt forums and might stop endless emails from Jo. But it really is your call. You built this forum, you pay for it and you do a good job keeping it running, so you get to decide how it's run and who gets to post.

I just don't see Blevins as the Cooper Anti-Christ. He doesn't piss me off the way he does everyone else here. Maybe I am just thicker skinned or more tolerant or both or neither. I do not think KC was DBC and have told that to Blevins. I think the chance that a NWA crew member would skyjack an NWA plane is very low, too risky.

I have a history of sticking up for hated underdogs, miscreants and other targets of scorn. I worked at the Public Defender's Office in Oakland. 

377

[Shutter]

I respect your opinion, but making a thread for them is not the answer. as I have said many times, Jo doesn't want to post on here, she has personally told me, so Jo is out of the equation. Robert has shown zero effort to become credible. he's like a spoiled brat who throws a tantrum when he doesn't get his way. this usually means resorting to taking things out of context, and trying really, really hard to discredit this forum, and it's members. I have zero tolerance for that.

we should let prisoners out for the weekend since they are cooped up all week? a ban is put in place for a reason, it's a punishment. that means they screwed up, not me. now, bans can be lifted, but only if a person shows improvement. you should know all about that in the field you are in. a majority of the fools are released far to early and repeat the offense again, or should of never been released in the first place.

[Shutter]

You are tolerant, that's for sure. a majority of people don't want to see Robert on this forum, it's not just me. he has been caught lying, he takes things out of context, constantly. he's spiteful, vindictive, he contradicts himself constantly. he has threads only visible to a couple members (for no reason) he closes his site constantly. he has his own forum, why do you feel he needs to be here? now, he went further by trying to test bills?

He is counter productive. the way he speaks about how things should be at any given thing he does should put him in the category of one of the richest men in the world. laughing at us poor fools while he counts his money? he should have a large following dwelling on his every comment to cherish for life? and yet, nobody is around him?

He doesn't "piss me off" it's his actions. actions speak louder than words, his actions are not acceptable.... there is a difference.

Lets really help those underdogs, perhaps a halfway house full of child molester beside schools, it's separate?

Got Hint?

[georger]

Uh oh, a 2 class system is emerging. Well, actually 3 class because we have 2 on the forum and 1 banned (Jo, Blevins, etc). When you are the piper you get to call the tune though. Carry on Shutter, The trains do run on time here. 

Happy 2017 to all 3 classes.

377

Lets be clear - this stratification is ONLY for the purpose of setting up a closed thread where those involved in the testing project can communicate directly, in one place. This however does not replace open forum posts about the Money or Tina Bar or anything else related .... I expect we will be bringing issues here as they arise so the public is going to kept informed and involved. We are 1000% open to any suggestions, questions, or whatever along the way. 

Or if there is some big Constitutional Issue at stake, which I fail to see at all!, then we can simply set up two PM categories and handle it that way! ??  All PMs are private here between people. Think of a closed testing thread as a closed Testing-PM feature. It literally is that. Surely nobody expects anyone to share their private PMs here, do they? All PM are private on every forum known including at Dropzone - why should it be any different here?

Why does Blevins have some special right to read people's PM here? Or their private email at home? That is really crazy! Why not then just give the nuclear codes to Blevins too? It is Blevins we are talking about.         

[Shutter]

Correct, what we are doing is simply replacing the discussion from the emails to a more stable position. when you try to communicate with emails and CC others the emails start piling up, then when you reply instead of reply to all, people get left out of the conversation. I did it already, and I noticed Meyer also forgot to reply to all. I seen a train wreak in the future...

I don't see a problem with this at all....

[Shutter]

I think PM's would also become an issue, plus no attachments....

[georger]

Correct, what we are doing is simply replacing the discussion from the emails to a more stable position. when you try to communicate with emails and CC others the emails start piling up, then when you reply instead of reply to all, people get left out of the conversation. I did it already, and I noticed Meyer also forgot to reply to all. I seen a train wreak in the future...

I don't see a problem with this at all....

Is it possible to just change the damned name of it? Call it "Testing PMS" or something? Can you put it as a second PM choice?

 

But we have to be able to make attachments..................

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaargh. This is nonsense. Just leave it alone. Its ok just as it is and if somebody has some big problem let them hire a lawyer and sue ..... uhmmmm ..... sue John Glenn !   

Folks, what Shutter is trying to do here is simply provide one place with a name that multiple people with different tech levels and different devices can all check in a communicate where we all will see it and can respond. This isn't Defcon V!

 

[Shutter]

You mean like making another thread of PM's? that can't be done...

[georger]

You mean like making another thread of PM's? that can't be done...

Under MY MESSAGES   can you set up PM-I and PM-II   or PM and PM-Testing? Everyone would have access to PM and only certain people would have access to PM-Testing?  Would that work? And could people make attachments?

I never dreamed this would become an issue!

[Shutter]

Folks, what Shutter is trying to do here is simple provide one place with a name that multiple people with different tech levels and different devices can all check in a communicate where we all will see it and can respond. This isn't Defcon V!

The bottom line is it's replacing emails...they were already getting spread out with all not involved, and responses over response and then new emails (and so on, and so on) like the commercial (Vo5) 

Does anyone else see a problem with this?

[Shutter]

You mean like making another thread of PM's? that can't be done...

Under MY MESSAGES   can you set up PM-I and PM-II   or PM and PM-Testing? Everyone would have access to PM and only certain people would have access to PM-Testing?  Would that work? And could people make attachments?

I never dreamed this would become an issue!

PM's are a set program. you can't change them. if we use PM's, the same will happen similar to the emails...

I have tried several attachment upgrades, but they never work. this theme is a third party theme, so some mods will conflict with it. remember a couple years ago when I shut the forum down. it was a modification that went haywire and locked us all out...