Bruce wrote: just like in 1980 when an 8-year old kid found the ONLY incontrovertible proof in Norjak, and all while he was cooking hot dogs at the beach.
What about the door placard?
377
To my view, the door placard is compelling evidence, but it is not incontrovertible. I think it should be considered as solid evidence, but not ROCK solid.
Plus, it could be a plant. Just a few little iffy things around the edges...
Consider these aspects:
Suppose 305 was flying the Malay-Canby bisect but you didn't want anyone to know. You'd have to have endless tidbits from Rataczak and Scott that they were flying over Woodland, in V-23 and saw the lights of Vancouver coming up, over the Washougal, flying over terrain that was 5,000 in elevation, etc. That would totally screw up any media investigation, which it has.
Then add in the door placard for good measure.
But why maintain secrecy, eh? Perhaps the whole DB Cooper skyjack set off alarm bells through the National Security apparatus. "We can't have the Russkies know how to deploy the aft stairs on a 727!" they scream. "Imagine a commercial airliner with 100 innocent passengers on board, but a few Russian operatives, too, who hijack their 727, fly over the White House and drop nasty stuff on the Prez, or Congress, or the SCOTUS - or Times Square, or the World Series, etc.!!!"
The military would be hamstrung because the passengers would act as a shield to a shoot down. So maybe everything about Norjak is a lie - a spin job to minimize the how-to's, and the don't-do's. That would also buttress NWO's efforts to protect its public image as a responsible and safe airline to fly. Hence, Tina had to keep her mouth shut, and Rataczak had to say a ton o' crazy stuff to keep everyone confused.
Then, of course, once you start the spin process you have to continue to lie to cover-up the cover-up, and the whole thing just gets really messy. In some ways, it's a wonder that the FBI didn't close the case way before 2016.
