Author Topic: General Questions About The Case  (Read 697682 times)

Offline sailshaw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #885 on: March 15, 2016, 10:54:25 AM »
377  You say: "What does Sailshaw think? He was a Boeing engineer. We have some other engineers reading this. Your thoughts?

I do not think it was obvious that the 727 could fly safely with the stairs extended. I do not think it was widely known or easily deducible that the stairs could be deployed in flight. It would have been easy for Boeing to have put in a landing gear squat switch activated interlock preventing airstair door opening after liftoff. I think Cooper knew it could be opened. How did he know?"

I Say:   Boeing was trying to sell more 727's to the US Government and did the test flights at Moses Lake (our testing field East of Seattle) and had full photo coverage by our photo unit. With the photo movies the sales team could discuss the advantages of a plane like the 727 that could take-off, fly, and land with the Air Stairs deployed. I eat each Thursday with a retired Boeing Sales person at my yacht club and will ask him this Thursday what he knows about these demonstration flights for the US Government. The information was for sales to the government and not for the public to know all about (to help with stopping public thoughts about uses of the 727). Knowing what we know now, the Cooper Vane lock-out would have been good to have in the original design and Norjak would not have happened. Squat switch requires electrical connections and was not considered when the Cooper Vane was designed as it works without power just airflow.

Bob Sailshaw
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

PS Sheridan made demo jumps dressed just like DB Cooper including loafers before Norjak. He was also dressed like DB in the Boeing News add for the Sky Diving Club including loafers and prior to Norjak
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 442 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #886 on: March 15, 2016, 12:19:24 PM »
Cooper Vane sure was a dirt simple solution, just a vane and a pivot.

What I am wondering is whether any of the Boeing tests involved opening the door and extending the stairs in flight. Please be sure to ask about that detail.

377
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #887 on: March 15, 2016, 01:11:11 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
377  You say: "What does Sailshaw think? He was a Boeing engineer. We have some other engineers reading this. Your thoughts?

I do not think it was obvious that the 727 could fly safely with the stairs extended. I do not think it was widely known or easily deducible that the stairs could be deployed in flight. It would have been easy for Boeing to have put in a landing gear squat switch activated interlock preventing airstair door opening after liftoff. I think Cooper knew it could be opened. How did he know?"

I Say:   Boeing was trying to sell more 727's to the US Government and did the test flights at Moses Lake (our testing field East of Seattle) and had full photo coverage by our photo unit. With the photo movies the sales team could discuss the advantages of a plane like the 727 that could take-off, fly, and land with the Air Stairs deployed. I eat each Thursday with a retired Boeing Sales person at my yacht club and will ask him this Thursday what he knows about these demonstration flights for the US Government. The information was for sales to the government and not for the public to know all about (to help with stopping public thoughts about uses of the 727). Knowing what we know now, the Cooper Vane lock-out would have been good to have in the original design and Norjak would not have happened. Squat switch requires electrical connections and was not considered when the Cooper Vane was designed as it works without power just airflow.

Bob Sailshaw
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

PS Sheridan made demo jumps dressed just like DB Cooper including loafers before Norjak. He was also dressed like DB in the Boeing News add for the Sky Diving Club including loafers and prior to Norjak

If those stair modifications were done for a Boeing contractor, your sales team fellow probably didn't know anything about the tests except what he read in the newspapers after the Cooper hijacking.
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #888 on: March 15, 2016, 01:24:00 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
377  You say: "What does Sailshaw think? He was a Boeing engineer. We have some other engineers reading this. Your thoughts?

I do not think it was obvious that the 727 could fly safely with the stairs extended. I do not think it was widely known or easily deducible that the stairs could be deployed in flight. It would have been easy for Boeing to have put in a landing gear squat switch activated interlock preventing airstair door opening after liftoff. I think Cooper knew it could be opened. How did he know?"

I Say:   Boeing was trying to sell more 727's to the US Government and did the test flights at Moses Lake (our testing field East of Seattle) and had full photo coverage by our photo unit. With the photo movies the sales team could discuss the advantages of a plane like the 727 that could take-off, fly, and land with the Air Stairs deployed. I eat each Thursday with a retired Boeing Sales person at my yacht club and will ask him this Thursday what he knows about these demonstration flights for the US Government. The information was for sales to the government and not for the public to know all about (to help with stopping public thoughts about uses of the 727). Knowing what we know now, the Cooper Vane lock-out would have been good to have in the original design and Norjak would not have happened. Squat switch requires electrical connections and was not considered when the Cooper Vane was designed as it works without power just airflow.

Bob Sailshaw
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

PS Sheridan made demo jumps dressed just like DB Cooper including loafers before Norjak. He was also dressed like DB in the Boeing News add for the Sky Diving Club including loafers and prior to Norjak

Yes, you have said some of this before. Maybe Shutter can find some of these Boeing photos of Sheridan jumping in loafers dressed like a suit. Did you know Wayne Forestal? Brian Reynolds? Dick Placencia?
   
YOu also say: The information was for sales to the government and not for the public to know all about (to help with stopping public thoughts about uses of the 727).

What have you withed from the public while promoting Peterson as DB Cooper?  :)

Isn't the job of a Boeing Sales guy to 'talk and sell'? ... to the public?  I wonder what the brain tissue of Boeing sales guys looks like. How do their neurons fire in one direction but not in the other and how do they know ?  :) I mean after years of practice talking and not-talking ... knowing and not-knowing ... them vs us et cetera. I'm always interested in the anatomical makeup of superior species!     :)
« Last Edit: March 15, 2016, 02:18:58 PM by georger »
 

Offline Prospector

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #889 on: March 15, 2016, 02:08:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Shootin’ from the hip here, but wasn’t Cooper observed to have a small bag of unknown content with him.  Something like 4”x12”x14”?  Can’t experiment with it now, but used to have a pair of Jungle Boots which I could scrunch down real tight into my kit.  Just guessing, but why not a pair in the bag with skull cap, pair of gloves, small gog’s, and roll of 1” gun tape.  Little bit of kit in a small package could make life a lot easier.  He had about ½ hour on his own back there where no one saw what he did.

Prospector,

Would you care to elaborate a bit on your background in parachuting and related activities?  Also, are you located outside the USA?

The paper bag that Cooper had has usually been described as about the size of those used by fast food carry out stores (or is it "take away" stores in your part of the world?).  The dimensions you gave are somewhat larger.

Yup, outside US.  Nope, never left a perfectly serviceable F/W aircraft.  Hope to attend the next symposium or gathering and meet in-person some of the Cooper Vets who have researched this mystery down to the finest detail and whose work I’m following-up on to formulate a fact-based working hypothesis. Will bring my rĂ©sumĂ© and answer any and all questions eye-to-eye about personal stuff there.
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 442 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #890 on: March 15, 2016, 02:23:30 PM »
"Nope, never left a perfectly serviceable F/W aircraft."

I think there are experienced skydivers who could truthfully say the same thing.

I've rarely seen a "perfectly serviceable" jumpship.

Here is an example: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

377
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #891 on: March 15, 2016, 02:26:00 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Shootin’ from the hip here, but wasn’t Cooper observed to have a small bag of unknown content with him.  Something like 4”x12”x14”?  Can’t experiment with it now, but used to have a pair of Jungle Boots which I could scrunch down real tight into my kit.  Just guessing, but why not a pair in the bag with skull cap, pair of gloves, small gog’s, and roll of 1” gun tape.  Little bit of kit in a small package could make life a lot easier.  He had about ½ hour on his own back there where no one saw what he did.

Prospector,

Would you care to elaborate a bit on your background in parachuting and related activities?  Also, are you located outside the USA?

The paper bag that Cooper had has usually been described as about the size of those used by fast food carry out stores (or is it "take away" stores in your part of the world?).  The dimensions you gave are somewhat larger.

Yup, outside US.  Nope, never left a perfectly serviceable F/W aircraft.  Hope to attend the next symposium or gathering and meet in-person some of the Cooper Vets who have researched this mystery down to the finest detail and whose work I’m following-up on to formulate a fact-based working hypothesis. Will bring my rĂ©sumĂ© and answer any and all questions eye-to-eye about personal stuff there.

Parking could become a problem. Be careful of the Vortex.  :)
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #892 on: March 15, 2016, 02:49:47 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Shootin’ from the hip here, but wasn’t Cooper observed to have a small bag of unknown content with him.  Something like 4”x12”x14”?  Can’t experiment with it now, but used to have a pair of Jungle Boots which I could scrunch down real tight into my kit.  Just guessing, but why not a pair in the bag with skull cap, pair of gloves, small gog’s, and roll of 1” gun tape.  Little bit of kit in a small package could make life a lot easier.  He had about ½ hour on his own back there where no one saw what he did.

Prospector,

Would you care to elaborate a bit on your background in parachuting and related activities?  Also, are you located outside the USA?

The paper bag that Cooper had has usually been described as about the size of those used by fast food carry out stores (or is it "take away" stores in your part of the world?).  The dimensions you gave are somewhat larger.

Yup, outside US.  Nope, never left a perfectly serviceable F/W aircraft.  Hope to attend the next symposium or gathering and meet in-person some of the Cooper Vets who have researched this mystery down to the finest detail and whose work I’m following-up on to formulate a fact-based working hypothesis. Will bring my rĂ©sumĂ© and answer any and all questions eye-to-eye about personal stuff there.

Parking could become a problem. Be careful of the Vortex.  :)

And the next gathering might be held in Canada, Mexico, or elsewhere outside the USA, depending on the end results of the current Presidential election campaign.  I would personally suggest Costa Rico or Belize if the nutcases do succeed in taking over here.

Be advised that there is a lot of BS on the old DropZone Cooper threads, as you probably already know.  Things are much better on this thread thanks to Shutter's strict management.
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #893 on: March 15, 2016, 03:24:15 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Shootin’ from the hip here, but wasn’t Cooper observed to have a small bag of unknown content with him.  Something like 4”x12”x14”?  Can’t experiment with it now, but used to have a pair of Jungle Boots which I could scrunch down real tight into my kit.  Just guessing, but why not a pair in the bag with skull cap, pair of gloves, small gog’s, and roll of 1” gun tape.  Little bit of kit in a small package could make life a lot easier.  He had about ½ hour on his own back there where no one saw what he did.

Prospector,

Would you care to elaborate a bit on your background in parachuting and related activities?  Also, are you located outside the USA?

The paper bag that Cooper had has usually been described as about the size of those used by fast food carry out stores (or is it "take away" stores in your part of the world?).  The dimensions you gave are somewhat larger.

Yup, outside US.  Nope, never left a perfectly serviceable F/W aircraft.  Hope to attend the next symposium or gathering and meet in-person some of the Cooper Vets who have researched this mystery down to the finest detail and whose work I’m following-up on to formulate a fact-based working hypothesis. Will bring my rĂ©sumĂ© and answer any and all questions eye-to-eye about personal stuff there.

Parking could become a problem. Be careful of the Vortex.  :)

And the next gathering might be held in Canada, Mexico, or elsewhere outside the USA, depending on the end results of the current Presidential election campaign.  I would personally suggest Costa Rico or Belize if the nutcases do succeed in taking over here.

Be advised that there is a lot of BS on the old DropZone Cooper threads, as you probably already know.  Things are much better on this thread thanks to Shutter's strict management.

He already knows that Cooper had mukluks stowed, a Captain Video badge, a Civil Air Patrol card from grade school, and  a Russian submarine waiting in the Lewis River ... which accounts for the Tina Bar money having arrived via Tom's Propeller Drag Theory at 2:36pm on a Tuesday in 4004BC.

 :-*
 

Offline Prospector

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #894 on: March 15, 2016, 09:11:22 PM »
To understand Cooper, you must freefall a mile in his loafers.  The suggestion was made that an opportunistic personality trait existed based on the assumption he had knowledge of 727 jump capabilities.  Now I’ll suggest he demonstrated manipulative tendencies based on an assumption he knew about V23.  Deeper yet into the rabbit hole.......

Cooper intended to commandeer a 727, extort negotiable currency, and escape by parachute.  It was not a suicide mission.  Cooper was calm, cool, and collected unless things were being perceived as not going his way (e.g. 1700hrs timeline restriction for deliverables, refuelling delays).  Cooper required repeated reassurance that there would be “no funny stuff”.  Cooper was perceived to have behaved in a childish mannerism when he received the cash in priority order – suggesting he got what he wanted most.  He wanted notes and matchbooks back but offered paper money (fingerprints?).  He appeared at ease with the operational aspects of parachutes.

Cooper ordered altitude of 10 000feet and direction south (Mexico) from SEA.  Cooper ordered aircraft into flight configuration for jump out of SEA (i.e. not enroute or over Mexico).  Cooper did not order V23.  Cooper insisted that once airborne from SEA that there would be no further touchdowns in the US, then relinquished and allowed a refueling stop in Reno.  Cooper seemed unsure about where he wanted to go as observed by flight attendant.  There is no described external influence forcing Cooper to jump when he jumped, he exited the aircraft on his own freewill and volition.  Air crew stated they knew they were over populated landscape when jump suspected.

Cooper was in control of the mission and had co-operation of the flight crew, he did what he did when he wanted to do it.  He jumped when he wanted to jump.  All he had to do was specify south and 10 000feet on a stormy night to get the aircraft on V23.  Looking at Mapsheet L1 - who would choose a flight path to the north, west, or east over the Cascades out of SEA?

Where in all of that is there any demonstrable evidence of specific intent to get himself into Mexico by hijacked aircraft?  If he intended to go to Mexico he would have gone to Mexico.  A soft-spoken thoughtful gentleman like Mr. Cooper wouldn’t tell a lie would he?

If the assumption is true, and the argument is valid, it creates a Cooper puzzle – did he get himself dropped-off close to where he got picked-up, picked-up close to where he got himself dropped-off, or both?
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #895 on: March 15, 2016, 09:28:47 PM »
Lots of "funny stuff" was thrown at Cooper.

Wrong money bag, he didn't like that...
Dummy chute. (didn't say a word)
Missing D-rings (didn't say a word)

It's hard to say where Cooper was going. he wanted the stairs down prior to takeoff. once that didn't happen he opened the stairs early in the flight. did Cooper know where he was when he jumped? the original LZ seems to be invalid. the timing in that area is off...where is Cooper?
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #896 on: March 15, 2016, 11:28:28 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
To understand Cooper, you must freefall a mile in his loafers.  The suggestion was made that an opportunistic personality trait existed based on the assumption he had knowledge of 727 jump capabilities.  Now I’ll suggest he demonstrated manipulative tendencies based on an assumption he knew about V23.  Deeper yet into the rabbit hole.......

Cooper intended to commandeer a 727, extort negotiable currency, and escape by parachute.  It was not a suicide mission.  Cooper was calm, cool, and collected unless things were being perceived as not going his way (e.g. 1700hrs timeline restriction for deliverables, refuelling delays).  Cooper required repeated reassurance that there would be “no funny stuff”.  Cooper was perceived to have behaved in a childish mannerism when he received the cash in priority order – suggesting he got what he wanted most.  He wanted notes and matchbooks back but offered paper money (fingerprints?).  He appeared at ease with the operational aspects of parachutes.

Cooper ordered altitude of 10 000feet and direction south (Mexico) from SEA.  Cooper ordered aircraft into flight configuration for jump out of SEA (i.e. not enroute or over Mexico).  Cooper did not order V23.  Cooper insisted that once airborne from SEA that there would be no further touchdowns in the US, then relinquished and allowed a refueling stop in Reno.  Cooper seemed unsure about where he wanted to go as observed by flight attendant.  There is no described external influence forcing Cooper to jump when he jumped, he exited the aircraft on his own freewill and volition.  Air crew stated they knew they were over populated landscape when jump suspected.

Cooper was in control of the mission and had co-operation of the flight crew, he did what he did when he wanted to do it.  He jumped when he wanted to jump.  All he had to do was specify south and 10 000feet on a stormy night to get the aircraft on V23.  Looking at Mapsheet L1 - who would choose a flight path to the north, west, or east over the Cascades out of SEA?

Where in all of that is there any demonstrable evidence of specific intent to get himself into Mexico by hijacked aircraft?  If he intended to go to Mexico he would have gone to Mexico.  A soft-spoken thoughtful gentleman like Mr. Cooper wouldn’t tell a lie would he?

If the assumption is true, and the argument is valid, it creates a Cooper puzzle – did he get himself dropped-off close to where he got picked-up, picked-up close to where he got himself dropped-off, or both?

Whether he intended the plane to use V23 or not, he bailed in or near V23. He also identified Tacoma from the air.
Not sure what that gets ?  ;)
« Last Edit: March 15, 2016, 11:29:13 PM by georger »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #897 on: March 15, 2016, 11:39:54 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
To understand Cooper, you must freefall a mile in his loafers.  The suggestion was made that an opportunistic personality trait existed based on the assumption he had knowledge of 727 jump capabilities.  Now I’ll suggest he demonstrated manipulative tendencies based on an assumption he knew about V23.  Deeper yet into the rabbit hole.......

Cooper intended to commandeer a 727, extort negotiable currency, and escape by parachute.  It was not a suicide mission.  Cooper was calm, cool, and collected unless things were being perceived as not going his way (e.g. 1700hrs timeline restriction for deliverables, refuelling delays).  Cooper required repeated reassurance that there would be “no funny stuff”.  Cooper was perceived to have behaved in a childish mannerism when he received the cash in priority order – suggesting he got what he wanted most.  He wanted notes and matchbooks back but offered paper money (fingerprints?).  He appeared at ease with the operational aspects of parachutes.

Cooper ordered altitude of 10 000feet and direction south (Mexico) from SEA.  Cooper ordered aircraft into flight configuration for jump out of SEA (i.e. not enroute or over Mexico).  Cooper did not order V23.  Cooper insisted that once airborne from SEA that there would be no further touchdowns in the US, then relinquished and allowed a refueling stop in Reno.  Cooper seemed unsure about where he wanted to go as observed by flight attendant.  There is no described external influence forcing Cooper to jump when he jumped, he exited the aircraft on his own freewill and volition.  Air crew stated they knew they were over populated landscape when jump suspected.

Cooper was in control of the mission and had co-operation of the flight crew, he did what he did when he wanted to do it.  He jumped when he wanted to jump.  All he had to do was specify south and 10 000feet on a stormy night to get the aircraft on V23.  Looking at Mapsheet L1 - who would choose a flight path to the north, west, or east over the Cascades out of SEA?

Where in all of that is there any demonstrable evidence of specific intent to get himself into Mexico by hijacked aircraft?  If he intended to go to Mexico he would have gone to Mexico.  A soft-spoken thoughtful gentleman like Mr. Cooper wouldn’t tell a lie would he?

If the assumption is true, and the argument is valid, it creates a Cooper puzzle – did he get himself dropped-off close to where he got picked-up, picked-up close to where he got himself dropped-off, or both?

Prospector, You are correct in stating that Cooper did not specify any airway.

But there were two airways between the Seattle VORTAC and the Portland VORTAC (which is now named the Battleground VORTAC).  The first is V-23 which was and is a dog-leg route between those two VORTACS and the second was V-23E (now designated V-495) which is a direct line between the VORTACS.

V-23E had higher terrain and could have presented a problem if the airliner didn't get up to 10,000 feet fairly fast and would have given Cooper problems if he had done a delayed drop in that area (especially with the several cloud layers and an overcast at about 5000 feet).

So the V-23 airway was selected by the flight crew and they never informed Cooper of that fact.  And it appears that Cooper was interested in jumping as soon as possible after take-off but no indication of a specific location for jumping. 
« Last Edit: March 15, 2016, 11:41:32 PM by Robert99 »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #898 on: March 15, 2016, 11:42:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Lots of "funny stuff" was thrown at Cooper.

Wrong money bag, he didn't like that...
Dummy chute. (didn't say a word)
Missing D-rings (didn't say a word)

It's hard to say where Cooper was going. he wanted the stairs down prior to takeoff. once that didn't happen he opened the stairs early in the flight. did Cooper know where he was when he jumped? the original LZ seems to be invalid. the timing in that area is off...where is Cooper?

Tina reportedly said that Cooper did mention the missing D-rings to her but didn't make an issue of it.
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #899 on: March 16, 2016, 12:55:39 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
To understand Cooper, you must freefall a mile in his loafers.  The suggestion was made that an opportunistic personality trait existed based on the assumption he had knowledge of 727 jump capabilities.  Now I’ll suggest he demonstrated manipulative tendencies based on an assumption he knew about V23.  Deeper yet into the rabbit hole.......

Cooper intended to commandeer a 727, extort negotiable currency, and escape by parachute.  It was not a suicide mission.  Cooper was calm, cool, and collected unless things were being perceived as not going his way (e.g. 1700hrs timeline restriction for deliverables, refuelling delays).  Cooper required repeated reassurance that there would be “no funny stuff”.  Cooper was perceived to have behaved in a childish mannerism when he received the cash in priority order – suggesting he got what he wanted most.  He wanted notes and matchbooks back but offered paper money (fingerprints?).  He appeared at ease with the operational aspects of parachutes.

Cooper ordered altitude of 10 000feet and direction south (Mexico) from SEA.  Cooper ordered aircraft into flight configuration for jump out of SEA (i.e. not enroute or over Mexico).  Cooper did not order V23.  Cooper insisted that once airborne from SEA that there would be no further touchdowns in the US, then relinquished and allowed a refueling stop in Reno.  Cooper seemed unsure about where he wanted to go as observed by flight attendant.  There is no described external influence forcing Cooper to jump when he jumped, he exited the aircraft on his own freewill and volition.  Air crew stated they knew they were over populated landscape when jump suspected.

Cooper was in control of the mission and had co-operation of the flight crew, he did what he did when he wanted to do it.  He jumped when he wanted to jump.  All he had to do was specify south and 10 000feet on a stormy night to get the aircraft on V23.  Looking at Mapsheet L1 - who would choose a flight path to the north, west, or east over the Cascades out of SEA?

Where in all of that is there any demonstrable evidence of specific intent to get himself into Mexico by hijacked aircraft?  If he intended to go to Mexico he would have gone to Mexico.  A soft-spoken thoughtful gentleman like Mr. Cooper wouldn’t tell a lie would he?

If the assumption is true, and the argument is valid, it creates a Cooper puzzle – did he get himself dropped-off close to where he got picked-up, picked-up close to where he got himself dropped-off, or both?

Prospector, You are correct in stating that Cooper did not specify any airway.

But there were two airways between the Seattle VORTAC and the Portland VORTAC (which is now named the Battleground VORTAC).  The first is V-23 which was and is a dog-leg route between those two VORTACS and the second was V-23E (now designated V-495) which is a direct line between the VORTACS.

V-23E had higher terrain and could have presented a problem if the airliner didn't get up to 10,000 feet fairly fast and would have given Cooper problems if he had done a delayed drop in that area (especially with the several cloud layers and an overcast at about 5000 feet).

So the V-23 airway was selected by the flight crew and they never informed Cooper of that fact.  And it appears that Cooper was interested in jumping as soon as possible after take-off but no indication of a specific location for jumping.

I cant think of one thing Cooper said or did other than specifying "south" to indicate he wanted V23, or even knew about Victor airways, or knew where the plane was unless he somehow monitored them taking off and somehow sensed they had turned and were headed south? There isnt any recorded remark or query between Cooper and the crew about airways, that we know of. If he surmised they were on V23 he didn't say anything about it, that we know. 

What we do know is he began putting on a chute shortly after they were delivered and he inspected them - that was witnessed. He then turned his attention to the door and the stairs, then told Tina to go forward.

I dont recall anything in any transcripts that has him discussing airways with Tina or anyone else. Maybe he knew they had to be taking V23 on the assumption they were flying south over a low elevation route? He did wait to bail and asked that the plane be leveled and slowed (we have that from Anderson etal). And he identified Tacoma from the air.   

Maybe you know something we don't know?   My feeling is you don't know anything NEW ?
« Last Edit: March 16, 2016, 01:57:28 AM by georger »