my next noob question (and I hope this is the right thread for it):
can someone provide or link to the executive summary of argument(s) that cooper probably didn't (or even couldn't have) survived the jump, and being out in the rough terrain in the cold, rainy night. iiuc, that is the fbi's position.
I know nothing about skydiving and parachutes. my naive sense is that he had a parachute on, he presumably pulled the ripcord....soooo.... where's the problem? I am prepared to have that thinking blasted to hell though.
as far as surviving in the elements that night, after a successful landing, i have some relevant background, and I don't find it so hard to believe that someone with some knowledge could have made it. especially if he had checked the weather forecast and worn long Johns under that suit.
The 'executive summary' socalled comes primarily from FBI agents Himmelsbach, Tosaw, and Carr - with a little backup- help from the rigging master Cossey who claimed that the chute he rigged and Cooper chose had a peculiar two-step hard pull only an experienced jumper could have activated (a claim later debunked ?). Members of the Boeing Skydiving Club and other professional skydivers were the consultants for the FBI's assessment.
Points are:
1. Cooper demonstrated no skydiving knowledge or skills commensurate with jumping from a jet doing 200mph.
2. Was not dressed to make a jump from a jet at 10,000 feet or survive the weather conditions. Would have lost his shoes in the jump. Method of tying off the money would have knocked him out and/or resulted in a unsurvivable tumble.
3. Jumped in remote hostile terrain not suitable for a safe landing or safe-easy trip out.
4. Probably didn't get the chute open.
5. His assessed profile fails to meet the 'McCoy' standard for skills or survivability: 'He knew just enough to get into trouble but not enough to pull off the jump' - this is the standard SA Carr cited.
Have I forgotten anything?