Author Topic: General Questions About The Case  (Read 774929 times)

Offline George21226

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1170 on: November 07, 2016, 01:05:05 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Don't know about smoke jumper payloads. I've jumped with about 25 lbs of stuff in addn to my rig. The weight isn't the problem, although it makes landings tricker, it's the aero drag asymmetry that messes things up in freefall. I could probably handle another 75 lbs if the payload pack was symmetrical. More weight makes for a higher speed landing but your canopy glide angle (dictated by L/D) remains unchanged.

377

377 - including parachute and reserve, it's not uncommon to carry a total weight of 160 lbs for paratroopers

George21226,

Could you elaborate on what you mean by the above?  What is your point?

377 is saying that he could handle about an additional 100 pounds with a square parachute in freefall and landing if it was symmetrically arranged on his person.

Are you (George21226) saying that military paratroopers doing freefalls with square parachutes can carry about 160 pounds (less the weight of the parachute system)?  There is not a world of difference here with what 377 is saying.

I think we all agree that static-line paratroopers carry a great amount of extra equipment and some of it can be lowered on a lanyard to contact the ground before the paratrooper does.  But this is not what 377 is saying.

377 is absolutely correct in saying that the horizontal landing speed goes up as a function of the total weight but that the glide angle (L/D) stays the same.

377 - Didn't mean to offend anyone.  All I was saying is that in '71 95% of the jumpers used traditional parachutes.   We called the performance (rectangular) chutes, "death rigs" due to the high percentage of malfunctions.  When I was jumping with the Marine Corps sports club at Quantico back in '73 & '74 they were still experimental.   In those days the mass majority of sport jumpers used military or modified military chutes.  Those military style chutes you could easily carry 100 lbs of gear no problem.

We jumped out of Hueys and CH-46's in '73 & '74.  The wind blast was far greater in the Hueys then the CH-46's.  You backed down the ramp of the CH-46 and just jumped backwards.  The prop wash straightened you out rather quickly.  Stable much more quickly then going out the side door of a Huey. 

Just sayin...
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1171 on: November 07, 2016, 01:32:44 PM »
Actually in 71 the vast majority of the canopies being jumped at my local DZs were Para Commanders (referred to as PCs) not military surplus rounds. Perhaps you included PCs in the "traditional" chute category as they are still rounds.

Squares were catching on fast but many were not mature designs. The early versions of the ParaPlane squares were delivered trimmed wrong and could very easily stall during the flare process and crash. They were sometimes referred to as Paraplegic Planes and for good reason.

I had MANY rough landings on my military C 9s but somehow managed to avoid breaking anything. I did a pretty good PLF as it was a necessity not an option. I never once stood up a C 9. Mine were old porous (1951 was the mfr date of my primary canopy) and came down damned fast.   

377

 

georger

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1172 on: November 07, 2016, 02:08:50 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Not exactly.

Scott said the flight path was WEST of Ariel over Woodland, not east over the Washougal, at Himmelsbach's retirement party, according to Calame and Rhodes.

But Himmelsbach is ADAMANT that Rataczak told him 305 was over the Washougal.

The clip from the KOIN reporter, Mike Monaghan, infers that Scott claimed Washougal, too, but does not make clear how or why he would say that. The FBI debriefing report on Scott is pretty sketchy. Ol' Scotty didn't say much of anything, deferring to everyone else.

Remember, JT was not at Himmelsbach's retirement party. Jerry and Ralph only connected in the late 1990s, according to Himmelsbach, when Jerry was roaming the Washougal River valley and found that briefcase in the cave, etc.

As I recall all of the posts about this: a number of people spoke to H about various things, at informal gatherings, during the time H was retiring, not just at his retirement party. According to JT, H reprises all of this to JT some years later.   

I agree: Scott's original position was 'near Woodland' or 'over Woodland', then he changed or softened that later ... ?

Not sure what Rad's "original" statements were. There are so many (sometimes conflicting) statements attributed to Rad at various times. But Rad is generally given credit for telling H '... now I think we were east ...'. If Calme etal say this happened at H's retirement party I would go with that - you might as well! Maybe Rad threw in Mars but changed his mind later?  :))  I dont personally believe Rad can be nailed down to anything because I think he has operated under a "don't talk' mandate ever since the hijacking and has made so many conflicting statements that nothing is definite.

Anderson? 

The NWA/FBI La Center Search Map pretty much speaks for what people were saying/thinking back in 71-72. 

I dont think there is any secret code book or testimony waiting to be found that is going to change any of this. We have the basic records that exist.

If you recall (its documented in the Transcript). Tina came in a said 'I think he's going to jump soon', or something to that affect. That was radioed in to everyone by Scott. That set the stage for everyone being alert to an imminent jump. But, how seriously did they take this? Were they actually keeping track minute by minute? According to just about everyone they suspected something had happened but nobody was 100% sure, and Anderson says they discussed it (the oscillations and then pressure spike) before calling it in then finally after some discussion Rataczak called it in abruptly! Rataczak even says "he jumped some time probably 5-10 minutes after our last communication with him". That's about as precise as it gets which goes back to the question 'how diligent were they being after Tina came in saying 'he's getting ready to jump sometime soon' ?   

I think there is more to this story than any of the principles are telling publicly. Whatever principles testified to or told H or didn't tell H at some date, in 1976 H called a reporter and stated publicly that the FBI had revised the jump time and place which he stated was now "12 miles north of Portland". H then retires 4 years later...

And 'yes'. Anything JT knows or has came in years later from H vs. firsthand witness. JT is a spectator in this whole thing!  O0      Many of JT's claims have been shown to be uninformed and untrue.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2016, 02:12:19 PM by georger »
 
The following users thanked this post: Bruce A. Smith

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1173 on: November 07, 2016, 02:49:15 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Actually in 71 the vast majority of the canopies being jumped at my local DZs were Para Commanders (referred to as PCs) not military surplus rounds. Perhaps you included PCs in the "traditional" chute category as they are still rounds.

Squares were catching on fast but many were not mature designs. The early versions of the ParaPlane squares were delivered trimmed wrong and could very easily stall during the flare process and crash. They were sometimes referred to as Paraplegic Planes and for good reason.

I had MANY rough landings on my military C 9s but somehow managed to avoid breaking anything. I did a pretty good PLF as it was a necessity not an option. I never once stood up a C 9. Mine were old porous (1951 was the mfr date of my primary canopy) and came down damned fast.   

377

My limited jumping experience was in the early 1960s and used a surplus WW2 canopy that had a 5-TU modification (I don't know if this was a C-9 or what).  And I also always knew when I hit the ground.

My one descent on a reserve, following a big time inversion of the main canopy, ended up with me landing in some tall thin sapling trees.  Only my toes made it all the way to the ground.  Then, I could not get enough slack in the harness to get the snaps to release.

Getting rid of the main canopy was a real, time consuming problem.  Those early Capewell releases did not work very well and I had rope burns on both hands and both thumbs were essentially sprained.

A couple of lessons were learned from that reserve descent.  Always wear gloves, you can take them off if necessary but you can't put them on if you don't have them along, and to carry a sharp pocket knife in a pocket that you can get to, after you are on the ground, so that you can cut yourself out of the harness if necessary.
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1174 on: November 07, 2016, 04:42:09 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

As I recall all of the posts about this: a number of people spoke to H about various things, at informal gatherings, during the time H was retiring, not just at his retirement party. According to JT, H reprises all of this to JT some years later.   

I agree: Scott's original position was 'near Woodland' or 'over Woodland', then he changed or softened that later ... ?

Not sure what Rad's "original" statements were. There are so many (sometimes conflicting) statements attributed to Rad at various times. But Rad is generally given credit for telling H '... now I think we were east ...'. If Calme etal say this happened at H's retirement party I would go with that - you might as well! Maybe Rad threw in Mars but changed his mind later?  :))  I dont personally believe Rad can be nailed down to anything because I think he has operated under a "don't talk' mandate ever since the hijacking and has made so many conflicting statements that nothing is definite.

Anderson? 

The NWA/FBI La Center Search Map pretty much speaks for what people were saying/thinking back in 71-72. 

I dont think there is any secret code book or testimony waiting to be found that is going to change any of this. We have the basic records that exist.

If you recall (its documented in the Transcript). Tina came in a said 'I think he's going to jump soon', or something to that affect. That was radioed in to everyone by Scott. That set the stage for everyone being alert to an imminent jump. But, how seriously did they take this? Were they actually keeping track minute by minute? According to just about everyone they suspected something had happened but nobody was 100% sure, and Anderson says they discussed it (the oscillations and then pressure spike) before calling it in then finally after some discussion Rataczak called it in abruptly! Rataczak even says "he jumped some time probably 5-10 minutes after our last communication with him". That's about as precise as it gets which goes back to the question 'how diligent were they being after Tina came in saying 'he's getting ready to jump sometime soon' ?   

I think there is more to this story than any of the principles are telling publicly. Whatever principles testified to or told H or didn't tell H at some date, in 1976 H called a reporter and stated publicly that the FBI had revised the jump time and place which he stated was now "12 miles north of Portland". H then retires 4 years later...

And 'yes'. Anything JT knows or has came in years later from H vs. firsthand witness. JT is a spectator in this whole thing!  O0      Many of JT's claims have been shown to be uninformed and untrue.

This is my general view of the subject, as well, Georger. Especially that the principals are holding back on information.
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1175 on: November 07, 2016, 05:22:54 PM »
R99 wrote: "My limited jumping experience was in the early 1960s and used a surplus WW2 canopy that had a 5-TU modification (I don't know if this was a C-9 or what).  And I also always knew when I hit the ground."

Bet it was actually a post WW2 surplus C 9 28 ft round ripstop canopy. 5 TU was a very common mod for the C 9. Could have been a larger 32 ft T-10 paratrooper canopy but it would have let you down pretty gently compared to the C 9's harsh "arrival".

If it was multi color it was almost certainly a C 9. Do you recall colors and patterns?

377

« Last Edit: November 07, 2016, 05:23:07 PM by 377 »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1176 on: November 07, 2016, 06:09:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
R99 wrote: "My limited jumping experience was in the early 1960s and used a surplus WW2 canopy that had a 5-TU modification (I don't know if this was a C-9 or what).  And I also always knew when I hit the ground."

Bet it was actually a post WW2 surplus C 9 28 ft round ripstop canopy. 5 TU was a very common mod for the C 9. Could have been a larger 32 ft T-10 paratrooper canopy but it would have let you down pretty gently compared to the C 9's harsh "arrival".

If it was multi color it was almost certainly a C 9. Do you recall colors and patterns?

377

It was definitely a 28 foot round ripstop canopy and was difficult to get into the pack with the deployment sleeve.  Amazingly enough, I can't remember the colors exactly. I think the canopy was entirely white but the deployment sleeve may, or may not, have been olive.
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1177 on: November 07, 2016, 07:06:22 PM »
28 ft round ripstop? C 9! Express elevator going down to ground level, all aboard.   ;)

I too struggled with that hassle of trying to get a sleeved C 9 into a standard pack. Eventually got closing flap extensions installed and packing became so much easier.

I can't tell you what a relief it was to transition into more modern canopies that didn't land so damned hard. The only things I miss about C 9s are the nearly silent rides down and the beauty of the sun shining down though those colored ripstop panels, like stained glass. 

Squares with their high flying speeds, generate a lot of noise coming down. Also the double surface squares just can't light up the way a sunlit C 9 could.

377
« Last Edit: November 07, 2016, 07:12:20 PM by 377 »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1178 on: November 07, 2016, 10:29:12 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
28 ft round ripstop? C 9! Express elevator going down to ground level, all aboard.   ;)

I too struggled with that hassle of trying to get a sleeved C 9 into a standard pack. Eventually got closing flap extensions installed and packing became so much easier.

I can't tell you what a relief it was to transition into more modern canopies that didn't land so damned hard. The only things I miss about C 9s are the nearly silent rides down and the beauty of the sun shining down though those colored ripstop panels, like stained glass. 

Squares with their high flying speeds, generate a lot of noise coming down. Also the double surface squares just can't light up the way a sunlit C 9 could.

377

In the early 1960s, the Para-Commanders were just being introduced and they had a price of close to $1000.00.  That compares to about $40.00 for my surplus military backpack.

I think someone, or some organization, donated money to the US Skydiving Team so they could buy PCs for the Internationals that were held about 1964 or so.

If the PCs hadn't been so expensive then, and if I hadn't spent a lot of time on business in the California desert at that time and gotten interested in something else, then my skydiving career would probably have been quite a bit longer.  After my descent on the reserve, I did give some thought to whether I valued my life at more than $40.00.  The answer was "yes" and that is why I wanted to get a PC.
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1179 on: November 08, 2016, 12:36:45 PM »
$40? Man I must have really overpaid. My first rig (main and belly reserve) was 100% surplus and cost me $50.

I was always 2 gens behind. I got started in jumping as a college student and kept the thrifty outlook after graduation. I was jumping surplus gear well into the 70s. Went to dirt cheap used PCs when everyone else was jumping squares and mothballing their older gear. But when I hit middle age and started making some money, I saw false economy in jumping yesterday's gear. Today I jump Triathlon mains and PD reserves. Nice landings, dependable. Still, never bought a brand new car and never bought a brand new rig. Cheap dies hard.

I think Cooper jumped a 28 ft C 9 but it's possible that it was a Navy 26 ft Conical. Either would have been a good choice for a high speed exit. Bruce actually knows more about which Norjack chutes were where than I do.

377




« Last Edit: November 08, 2016, 12:37:24 PM by 377 »
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1180 on: November 08, 2016, 04:33:16 PM »
All I really know is that's Cooper jumped with some white thingy that had strings attached...
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1181 on: November 08, 2016, 04:38:09 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
$40? Man I must have really overpaid. My first rig (main and belly reserve) was 100% surplus and cost me $50.

I was always 2 gens behind. I got started in jumping as a college student and kept the thrifty outlook after graduation. I was jumping surplus gear well into the 70s. Went to dirt cheap used PCs when everyone else was jumping squares and mothballing their older gear. But when I hit middle age and started making some money, I saw false economy in jumping yesterday's gear. Today I jump Triathlon mains and PD reserves. Nice landings, dependable. Still, never bought a brand new car and never bought a brand new rig. Cheap dies hard.

I think Cooper jumped a 28 ft C 9 but it's possible that it was a Navy 26 ft Conical. Either would have been a good choice for a high speed exit. Bruce actually knows more about which Norjack chutes were where than I do.

377

I actually worked for a government organization on the east coast at that time and I could never find a reserve parachute to purchase.  So I always used a reserve my instructor owned.  After my mishap, the instructor got my autograph in his log book and whatever refreshments he wanted although I don't remember what they were.  That was more than 50 years ago.
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1182 on: November 08, 2016, 07:21:08 PM »
R99 wrote: "After my mishap, the instructor got my autograph in his log book and whatever refreshments he wanted although I don't remember what they were.  That was more than 50 years ago."

Ya never forget your first reserve ride. I remember mine like it was yesterday. I think it was actually 1972. A dirt cheap surplus 26 ft Navy Conical saved my life.

I sure wish I knew if Cooper actually looked at packing cards. That would tell me a LOT. Tosaw and Himmelsbach disagreed about this important detail.

377
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1183 on: December 16, 2016, 07:54:38 PM »
727 in rough service, flying cargo to dirt strips in Africa.



377
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: General Questions About The Case
« Reply #1184 on: December 16, 2016, 11:37:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
727 in rough service, flying cargo to dirt strips in Africa.



377

What is a 727 like that worth?