Author Topic: Flight Path And Related Issues  (Read 824562 times)

Offline Ron and Pat

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #270 on: May 20, 2014, 11:22:01 AM »
Our suspect told us she opened the stairs in Southwest Washington. She was sitting at the top of the staircase where she was shielded from the wind watching for the lights of the Portland. She knew they would be flying Victor 23 and she knew the approximate speed so she could use her watch to time her jump to her predetermined spot near Woodburn, Oregon.  (The fact that she could see the lights that night was verified in the transcripts from the flight when the pilot mentioned seeing the lights when they passed over Vancouver.)  She also used the angle of the search light from Aurora Airport (45 degrees) to narrow in on the site. She had chosen Woodburn because the area was so flat. She had used the cord from one of the chutes to tie the moneybag to her in a manner that she could use it as a depth finder when she got close to the ground. She timed her jump but also used the light from I5 to let her know when to pull her chute (at about 1000 feet above the ground).
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #271 on: June 01, 2014, 05:41:33 PM »
I've ran two tests today from take off to a finish point of crossing the Lewis river. I'm getting a time of 34 minutes of flight time. that's what the clock reads. I'm starting the clock, and allowing a 30 second stall prior to take off, or a 7:36:30 second real time take off time.

Temp 42 degree's
wind 180 degrees at 21 knots
altitude 10,000
Fuel Flow 4500
Flaps 15 degrees
Gear down
TAT reads -9
speed 160-170 KIAS
Ground Speed 195-201

It appears to me after doing this dozens of times. the path can be flown in the manor it's shown on the map. I think it boils down to asking how accurate the path is from east to west in many locations.

we have people claiming the plane was west of the known flight path. this has some documentation attached with it. I believe others believe the path was east of the known flight path. how do we figure out where the hell the plane was on November 24, 1971 at 7:51 to about 8:22 that evening?
« Last Edit: June 01, 2014, 06:04:45 PM by shutter »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #272 on: June 03, 2014, 04:37:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've ran two tests today from take off to a finish point of crossing the Lewis river. I'm getting a time of 34 minutes of flight time. that's what the clock reads. I'm starting the clock, and allowing a 30 second stall prior to take off, or a 7:36:30 second real time take off time.

Temp 42 degree's
wind 180 degrees at 21 knots
altitude 10,000
Fuel Flow 4500
Flaps 15 degrees
Gear down
TAT reads -9
speed 160-170 KIAS
Ground Speed 195-201

It appears to me after doing this dozens of times. the path can be flown in the manor it's shown on the map. I think it boils down to asking how accurate the path is from east to west in many locations.

we have people claiming the plane was west of the known flight path. this has some documentation attached with it. I believe others believe the path was east of the known flight path. how do we figure out where the hell the plane was on November 24, 1971 at 7:51 to about 8:22 that evening?

It sure as XXXX didn't come in over the Troutdale airport as JT says. There is ample firsthand documentation to discount that completely. I wish Rataczak would talk with us seriously. Oh well ...

Good work. Thanks. 

PS: The placard defines the northern segment of the FP. I guess you can't use the money at TBar in the same way -
even if you draw a reasonable arc (well defined) around the whole area of TBar and assume the plane had to cross somewhere within that radius. That would be the ordinary approach. If you back up toward Vancouver say 4 miles now I'm willing to bet the FBI would have accepted that as falling within 'defined limits', whatever those limits are?
Yes there is the matter of flow. Maybe the money washed in from Idaho! I think that's somewhere east of the Washougal. Maybe it washed in from ..... France where they had the Dan Cooper comic! France is east of the Washougal! Point is, in this whole discussion lasting years literally nobody (save for R99) has been willing to try and define a reasonable radius from Tina Bar ... which the people in France would accept! Funny.     

So, here's a brand new theory: the dredging deposits at Tina Bar aren't the whole story! There were deposits put east of Tina Bar, on Fazio property, which we have not been told about! Those deposits came from ... dredging more near Portland! Viola! It is those deposits that moved the money to Tina Bar after a period of time? Some scenario like that.  That compromise keeps the FBI flight path and moves money to Tina Bar. I like compromises with the Devil!
« Last Edit: June 03, 2014, 05:22:03 PM by georger »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #273 on: June 03, 2014, 06:13:53 PM »
There has to be a simple solution to all of this. either the path is off, east, or west, or something is wrong with the timing, and how the transcripts are recorded? human error, along with calculation error's could hold the secret. If you go by Rats calculations of up to 15 minutes on the pressure bump. he is past the Columbia and plopped in the Willamette, or any of the surround waters? Smith lake, Byee lake.

Here is a short video I made showing roughly the 8:16 - 8:17 mark. the plane starts it's turn, but look at all the water!!!!!!! I'm not exactly on the path, but close enough for the video. the video is in slow motion so you can see better. the plane would wiz by to fast in regular speed :)

I just noticed I forgot to take the video out of my Tomcat breaking the sound barrier....a bonus I guess HaHa




« Last Edit: June 03, 2014, 06:21:30 PM by shutter »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #274 on: June 03, 2014, 10:29:39 PM »
The placard really bugs me for some reason. looking at the photo it appears it was attached at the corners. Cooper possibly, in his frustration ripped it off the wall while trying to get the stairs down, or past the point where he thought they would go down. it could of landed on the stairs, but how did it get out if he ripped it off the wall miles back. he must of been on the stairs which would cause more airflow into the area?

The transcripts say the last contact was 55 minutes ago at the 8:52 mark. that's not 8:05. this would put Coopers last contact before Toledo. have I went too far off the deep end on this? it seemed precise by saying 55, not a half hour, or 45, but around 55 minutes?



 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #275 on: June 03, 2014, 11:49:57 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The placard really bugs me for some reason. looking at the photo it appears it was attached at the corners. Cooper possibly, in his frustration ripped it off the wall while trying to get the stairs down, or past the point where he thought they would go down. it could of landed on the stairs, but how did it get out if he ripped it off the wall miles back. he must of been on the stairs which would cause more airflow into the area?

The transcripts say the last contact was 55 minutes ago at the 8:52 mark. that's not 8:05. this would put Coopers last contact before Toledo. have I went too far off the deep end on this? it seemed precise by saying 55, not a half hour, or 45, but around 55 minutes?

where, what time, does the Transcript say this? ... Ok have it below:

"(8:52pm pst)  NWA -    Flight over EUC (EUG?) VOR, 100000’, 170KIAS, fuel aboard
33,5000lb, FP and configuration remained the same (on V23).  Advised that they had had
no communications with the HJ for “about the last 55 minutes” despite several attempts on cockpit to cabin inter phone and PA system. Crew has assured that fuel was more than adequate to get to RNO, that RNO weather was good, etc. SEADD  had also been actively following and participating in these events. "

The they is NWA or ATC ?  Contradicts everything Ckret, Rataczak, Anderson, etal have ever said. 

« Last Edit: June 03, 2014, 11:58:07 PM by georger »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #276 on: June 03, 2014, 11:54:31 PM »
see photo...it's at the 8:52 mark.
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #277 on: June 03, 2014, 11:59:41 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
see photo...it's at the 8:52 mark.

Yep, found it and revised mine above. Its stuff like this that drives me crazy. Maybe different clocks, different info, from different people. 
« Last Edit: June 04, 2014, 12:01:34 AM by georger »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #278 on: June 04, 2014, 12:09:11 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
see photo...it's at the 8:52 mark.

Yep, found it and revised mine above. Its stuff like this that drives me crazy. Maybe different clocks, different info, from different people.


Seems Anderson would be the key person to talk to about tracking....
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #279 on: June 04, 2014, 12:11:57 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
see photo...it's at the 8:52 mark.

Yep, found it and revised mine above. Its stuff like this that drives me crazy. Maybe different clocks, different info, from different people.


Seems Anderson would be the key person to talk to about tracking....

Tracking? You mean the flight path? We already talked to him about times etc ... he confirms R's 8:05 but says there was one more communication (specific instruction) after 8:05, then added the part about them all 'discussing' the bump at length before Rat then reported it ...
« Last Edit: June 04, 2014, 12:14:37 AM by georger »
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #280 on: June 04, 2014, 12:19:59 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
see photo...it's at the 8:52 mark.

Yep, found it and revised mine above. Its stuff like this that drives me crazy. Maybe different clocks, different info, from different people.


Seems Anderson would be the key person to talk to about tracking....

Tracking? You mean the flight path? We already talked to him about times etc ... he confirms R's 8:05 but says there was one more communication (specific instruction) after 8:05, then added the part about them all 'discussing' the bump at length before Rat then reported it ...


was it a interview with him, or someone out of the media?
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #281 on: June 04, 2014, 12:29:38 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
see photo...it's at the 8:52 mark.

Yep, found it and revised mine above. Its stuff like this that drives me crazy. Maybe different clocks, different info, from different people.


Seems Anderson would be the key person to talk to about tracking....

Tracking? You mean the flight path? We already talked to him about times etc ... he confirms R's 8:05 but says there was one more communication (specific instruction) after 8:05, then added the part about them all 'discussing' the bump at length before Rat then reported it ...


was it a interview with him, or someone out of the media?

Interview last year - Hom and I submitted rounds of questions over several weeks.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2014, 12:35:25 AM by georger »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #282 on: June 04, 2014, 12:32:46 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've ran two tests today from take off to a finish point of crossing the Lewis river. I'm getting a time of 34 minutes of flight time. that's what the clock reads. I'm starting the clock, and allowing a 30 second stall prior to take off, or a 7:36:30 second real time take off time.

Temp 42 degree's
wind 180 degrees at 21 knots
altitude 10,000
Fuel Flow 4500
Flaps 15 degrees
Gear down
TAT reads -9
speed 160-170 KIAS
Ground Speed 195-201

It appears to me after doing this dozens of times. the path can be flown in the manor it's shown on the map. I think it boils down to asking how accurate the path is from east to west in many locations.

we have people claiming the plane was west of the known flight path. this has some documentation attached with it. I believe others believe the path was east of the known flight path. how do we figure out where the hell the plane was on November 24, 1971 at 7:51 to about 8:22 that evening?

It sure as XXXX didn't come in over the Troutdale airport as JT says. There is ample firsthand documentation to discount that completely. I wish Rataczak would talk with us seriously. Oh well ...

Good work. Thanks. 

PS: The placard defines the northern segment of the FP. I guess you can't use the money at TBar in the same way -
even if you draw a reasonable arc (well defined) around the whole area of TBar and assume the plane had to cross somewhere within that radius. That would be the ordinary approach. If you back up toward Vancouver say 4 miles now I'm willing to bet the FBI would have accepted that as falling within 'defined limits', whatever those limits are?
Yes there is the matter of flow. Maybe the money washed in from Idaho! I think that's somewhere east of the Washougal. Maybe it washed in from ..... France where they had the Dan Cooper comic! France is east of the Washougal! Point is, in this whole discussion lasting years literally nobody (save for R99) has been willing to try and define a reasonable radius from Tina Bar ... which the people in France would accept! Funny.     

So, here's a brand new theory: the dredging deposits at Tina Bar aren't the whole story! There were deposits put east of Tina Bar, on Fazio property, which we have not been told about! Those deposits came from ... dredging more near Portland! Viola! It is those deposits that moved the money to Tina Bar after a period of time? Some scenario like that.  That compromise keeps the FBI flight path and moves money to Tina Bar. I like compromises with the Devil!

Georger and Shutter, let's discuss some limitations involving the Tina Bar area.  At Tina Bar, the Columbia River runs almost straight north, or about 2 degrees east of true north to be exact.  So the Fazio property is EAST of Tina Bar and about one-fourth of a mile wide (measured east to west).  On the east side of the Fazio property, at least the sand and dairy operations part of it, is the North West Lower River Road which is built on top of a levee.  So basically nothing is going to move across the Fazio property from the east except during extreme flooding which would have to top the North West Lower River Road and cover most of the Fazio property.

I believe some dredged material was placed between the river's edge and the sand operation which is on the south side of the dairy operation.  But personally, I doubt that any dredged material included Cooper or the money.  Since more than one packet of bills were found together, it suggests to me that they didn't move very far after getting out of the money bag and also suggests repeatability in that the packets may have arrived at the same location at slightly different times (maybe a handful of days).

The Columbia River's normal level is about 5 to 7 feet Above Sea Level with a daily tidal variation of less than 2 feet.  Based on photographs of the FBI agents digging after the money find, I would estimate that the money was found at about 10 to 12 feet ASL.  And the money would have to arrive at Tina Bar at that level or above it.

Further, Tom Kaye's money experiments indicated that the first thing that happens to a packet of bills (with one rubber band at the center) is that the bills fan out and then the packet sinks and stays on the bottom.  This means to me that once on the bottom, the bills would never return to the surface.  So to repeat, the money would have to arrive at Tina Bar at the level it was found or from above that level.

Tom used his experiments to discount the Washougal Wash Down theory.  I completely agree with that and would go further by stating that the airliner was never over the Washougal watershed in the first place.  So in my opinion, if the money was ever in the Columbia River its entrance into the river would have to be roughly somewhere between Tina Bar and the point where the airliner crossed back over solid ground several miles south of Tina Bar.

Remember that if the airliner was bypassing Portland on the west side, as suggested by some of the maps and book narratives, it would basically fly over the Columbia River for several miles and would not be further west than the west side of the river as it passed Tina Bar.  This simple consideration suggests that Cooper would have to be a no-pull and died in the jump.  It also suggest that Cooper landed on solid ground on the EAST side of the river in the Tina Bar area.  The reasoning for this is quite simple and involves parachute operational considerations.  The flushing channel between the Columbia River and Vancouver Lake is basically the southernmost point that Cooper could have landed.

So broadly speaking, in my opinion Cooper landed somewhere between Tina Bar and the flushing channel (north and south) and between the Columbia River and the North West Lower River Road (east and west).  A study of contour maps reduces greatly the possible landing sites for Cooper.  When all is said and done, a landing area for Cooper can probably be stated that is less than one-half square mile in size, and perhaps as little as one-eight of a square mile.  Hopefully, more accurate data than is presently available will be released in due time.  If that happens, then meaningful progress can be made in resolving the Cooper case.

Robert99   
« Last Edit: June 04, 2014, 12:37:08 AM by Robert99 »
 

georger

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #283 on: June 04, 2014, 12:52:26 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've ran two tests today from take off to a finish point of crossing the Lewis river. I'm getting a time of 34 minutes of flight time. that's what the clock reads. I'm starting the clock, and allowing a 30 second stall prior to take off, or a 7:36:30 second real time take off time.

Temp 42 degree's
wind 180 degrees at 21 knots
altitude 10,000
Fuel Flow 4500
Flaps 15 degrees
Gear down
TAT reads -9
speed 160-170 KIAS
Ground Speed 195-201

It appears to me after doing this dozens of times. the path can be flown in the manor it's shown on the map. I think it boils down to asking how accurate the path is from east to west in many locations.

we have people claiming the plane was west of the known flight path. this has some documentation attached with it. I believe others believe the path was east of the known flight path. how do we figure out where the hell the plane was on November 24, 1971 at 7:51 to about 8:22 that evening?

It sure as XXXX didn't come in over the Troutdale airport as JT says. There is ample firsthand documentation to discount that completely. I wish Rataczak would talk with us seriously. Oh well ...

Good work. Thanks. 

PS: The placard defines the northern segment of the FP. I guess you can't use the money at TBar in the same way -
even if you draw a reasonable arc (well defined) around the whole area of TBar and assume the plane had to cross somewhere within that radius. That would be the ordinary approach. If you back up toward Vancouver say 4 miles now I'm willing to bet the FBI would have accepted that as falling within 'defined limits', whatever those limits are?
Yes there is the matter of flow. Maybe the money washed in from Idaho! I think that's somewhere east of the Washougal. Maybe it washed in from ..... France where they had the Dan Cooper comic! France is east of the Washougal! Point is, in this whole discussion lasting years literally nobody (save for R99) has been willing to try and define a reasonable radius from Tina Bar ... which the people in France would accept! Funny.     

So, here's a brand new theory: the dredging deposits at Tina Bar aren't the whole story! There were deposits put east of Tina Bar, on Fazio property, which we have not been told about! Those deposits came from ... dredging more near Portland! Viola! It is those deposits that moved the money to Tina Bar after a period of time? Some scenario like that.  That compromise keeps the FBI flight path and moves money to Tina Bar. I like compromises with the Devil!

Georger and Shutter, let's discuss some limitations involving the Tina Bar area.  At Tina Bar, the Columbia River runs almost straight north, or about 2 degrees east of true north to be exact.  So the Fazio property is EAST of Tina Bar and about one-fourth of a mile wide (measured east to west).  On the east side of the Fazio property, at least the sand and dairy operations part of it, is the North West Lower River Road which is built on top of a levee.  So basically nothing is going to move across the Fazio property from the east except during extreme flooding which would have to top the North West Lower River Road and cover most of the Fazio property.

I believe some dredged material was placed between the river's edge and the sand operation which is on the south side of the dairy operation.  But personally, I doubt that any dredged material included Cooper or the money.  Since more than one packet of bills were found together, it suggests to me that they didn't move very far after getting out of the money bag and also suggests repeatability in that the packets may have arrived at the same location at slightly different times (maybe a handful of days).

The Columbia River's normal level is about 5 to 7 feet Above Sea Level with a daily tidal variation of less than 2 feet.  Based on photographs of the FBI agents digging after the money find, I would estimate that the money was found at about 10 to 12 feet ASL.  And the money would have to arrive at Tina Bar at that level or above it.

Further, Tom Kaye's money experiments indicated that the first thing that happens to a packet of bills (with one rubber band at the center) is that the bills fan out and then the packet sinks and stays on the bottom.  This means to me that once on the bottom, the bills would never return to the surface.  So to repeat, the money would have to arrive at Tina Bar at the level it was found or from above that level.

Tom used his experiments to discount the Washougal Wash Down theory.  I completely agree with that and would go further by stating that the airliner was never over the Washougal watershed in the first place.  So in my opinion, if the money was ever in the Columbia River its entrance into the river would have to be roughly somewhere between Tina Bar and the point where the airliner crossed back over solid ground several miles south of Tina Bar.

Remember that if the airliner was bypassing Portland on the west side, as suggested by some of the maps and book narratives, it would basically fly over the Columbia River for several miles and would not be further west than the west side of the river as it passed Tina Bar.  This simple consideration suggests that Cooper would have to be a no-pull and died in the jump.  It also suggest that Cooper landed on solid ground on the EAST side of the river in the Tina Bar area.  The reasoning for this is quite simple and involves parachute operational considerations.  The flushing channel between the Columbia River and Vancouver Lake is basically the southernmost point that Cooper could have landed.

So broadly speaking, in my opinion Cooper landed somewhere between Tina Bar and the flushing channel (north and south) and between the Columbia River and the North West Lower River Road (east and west).  A study of contour maps reduces greatly the possible landing sites for Cooper.  When all is said and done, a landing area for Cooper can probably be stated that is less than one-half square mile in size, and perhaps as little as one-eight of a square mile.  Hopefully, more accurate data than is presently available will be released in due time.  If that happens, then meaningful progress can be made in resolving the Cooper case.

Robert99

It is a viable theory. Im not sure I like packets arriving separately then stacking in the same location? I would prefer packets arriving in cemented blocks held together by sediment. Of course if Dorwin's 'part of a brief case was found' is ever confirmed, then its a new ball game.

By what date do you want the money in the Ingram location? Under how much sediment?

     
« Last Edit: June 04, 2014, 12:54:32 AM by georger »
 

Robert99

  • Guest
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #284 on: June 04, 2014, 01:52:19 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

It is a viable theory. Im not sure I like packets arriving separately then stacking in the same location? I would prefer packets arriving in cemented blocks held together by sediment. Of course if Dorwin's 'part of a brief case was found' is ever confirmed, then its a new ball game.

By what date do you want the money in the Ingram location? Under how much sediment?
   

Last July, Meyer Louie and I talked to a fisherman named "Jon" (or maybe "John") who claimed that he had basically visited Tina Bar just about ever day since the date of the hijacking.  And with the other fisherman who were at Tina Bar frequently, it is a bit of a surprise that the money was not found before it was covered by sand.  I don't see any rational explanation for the non-discovery unless there was snow or other bad weather that keep people away for several days or longer.


I believe Brian Ingram stated that the packets were under about 1 to 3 inches of sand.  And they were cemented together.  Also, one of the packets had obviously been exposed to water before it was cemented since some of the bills had been rotated and portions of them torn off before being buried.  You have stated elsewhere that the sand between the bills was "rounded" and that Palmer called it Columbia River "silt".  Presumably, the "silt" in question also coated the land above the level where the bills were found.  This last point could have been accomplished during earlier flooding, some of which got to 16 feet above sea level or just below the top of the "dam" for the dairy retention pond.  Jon said that he had never seen the river water level high enough to actually flow into the retention pond.

Unless you and Tom Kaye are permitted to do some additional tests that finds evidence of Columbia River water contamination, such as those missing diatoms, there is no data to indicate that the money packets were ever in the river.  This despite the obvious conclusion that the money may well have been buried in cemented form under several inches of sand, which in turn was under maybe up to 6 or 10 feet of river water.  So the packets would have been exposed to the round sand or "silt" prior to arriving at the location of their discovery at Tina Bar.

To me, this suggests that the prior location(s) of the packets would have been exposed to moving water (other than river water) on at least some occasions and that was the water that cemented the packets and "torqued" one of them.  Perhaps the cementing of the packets could occur while the bills were more or less protected to some extent by the money bag, or whatever, but the torqued packet would need direct contact without protection with moving water (perhaps rainwater) before being cemented.  This suggests that the packets spent some significant time elsewhere before they arrived at Tina Bar.  The fact that some of the bills were in quite good condition when cemented supports the idea that the cementing took place soon after the hijacking.

Do you know what the Columbia River water level at Vancouver was on the date of the hijacking?  When did it reach 10 to 12 feet?  Also, the construction of the flushing channel and the marina, just upstream of Tina Bar, may have figured into this one way or another.  Does Amazon, who used to keep her boat there, know the date of the marina's construction?

Robert99