Author Topic: Flight Path And Related Issues  (Read 983857 times)

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1935 on: April 25, 2019, 03:27:17 PM »
Kermit, I see your point and could be a valid one. on the other hand it depends on how well they knew the area where they hunt. I lived in the country for years and was in the woods almost everyday. we could find spots easily by remembering the surroundings. they would have to be off by miles to make any real difference with the location given. Hicks did claim he hunted there for years..

Eric, that sounds good. I had a feeling it wouldn't be a big deal or some sort of "Area 51" location where it's restricted to access.
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1936 on: April 25, 2019, 04:18:03 PM »
Don’t get me wrong, the placard find is significant. My point is that it’s mostly relevant to figuring out the flight path and not of much use in determining the exit point. The placard is a very significant find.

377
« Last Edit: April 25, 2019, 05:07:58 PM by 377 »
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1937 on: April 25, 2019, 04:49:22 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

First off this guy was actually a hunting buddy who was there when the placard was found. As I recall they were picking up litter and had simply put the placard in their pocket and had no reason to mark the exact spot where it was found. His memory could actually be far better then Carroll Hicks. I had a hunting partner who had a terrible sense of direction and never had any idea where he was. The placard find location is one of ONLY two items ever recovered from the hyjacking. If you or others think the placard find location is meaningless, so be it.
I happen to think it’s relevant to at least giving a clue as to where the aircraft was flying SHORTLY before Cooper bailed. Many people have combed over Tina Bar site ad Nauseum but to my knowledge very few have ever been to the placard location. I find it interesting and the area is awesome !

I agree that the placard is very important. Furthermore, it has been largely overlooked as a valid piece of evidence that could clarify a flight path. I believe the reason it has been ignored for all of these years is because the Tena Bar money find was shortly thereafter and that immediately took over the spotlight.

Shutter, I have obtained the necessary info from Weyerhaeuser to gain access to the placard find spot. My primary objective will be to get a feel for the lay of the land, take pictures and perhaps leave a piece of a similar item behind to study any migration patterns that may occur over the course of the year.

Placard find in 1978. Month? Money find Feb 1980. Shortly thereafter? They came from the same plane on the same flight path. Jesus in the toast?
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1938 on: April 25, 2019, 04:53:33 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Kermit, I see your point and could be a valid one. on the other hand it depends on how well they knew the area where they hunt. I lived in the country for years and was in the woods almost everyday. we could find spots easily by remembering the surroundings. they would have to be off by miles to make any real difference with the location given. Hicks did claim he hunted there for years..

Eric, that sounds good. I had a feeling it wouldn't be a big deal or some sort of "Area 51" location where it's restricted to access.

I had a cousin who knew them - they were part of a hunting party of five guys that hunted the area every year. The name of the town where they met yearly was posted to DZ years ago. There is nothing complicated about this. The name of the other guy may be in newspaper articles of the time - I thot TK had the names but who knows ... I guess not. I thot TK met with one of them or the family?

I need to go feed the camels -  :rofl:
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1939 on: April 25, 2019, 04:57:01 PM »
PING 377 ---

In the current chute confusion, if Cooper used one of Cossey's chute, do we know the model, and how does this change your thought from years ago that 'Cooper chose the best chute of the bunch of back packs for the jump' - is that still valid or gone with the wind?

 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Thanked: 443 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1940 on: April 25, 2019, 05:20:52 PM »
I currently think Cooper had 2 main chutes to choose from although that pot is being stirred. I think he jumped a C9 28 foot flat circular canopy otherwise known as a “round”. Purists tell me that the solid white C9 type canopies had a different model number: C8. Originally I thought that the two main chutes Cooper could choose from were a sport or perhaps civilian emergency canopy and a C9 type military canopy. In my opinion, the military canopy would be by far the better choice as most civilian or sport canopies had a maximum opening speed of 150 miles an hour. The C9 can withstand much higher opening speeds. As more info came in, I came to believe that the two choices Cooper had were likely a 26 foot Navy conical and a 28 foot round military C9. Both are excellent and super tough emergency canopies. Either would have been a good choice.

I’ve also said that Cooper could’ve just made a lucky random choice and known nothing about the parachutes contained within the rigs. If one canopy was better than the other he had a 50% chance of getting the right one.

377
 
The following users thanked this post: georger

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1941 on: April 25, 2019, 05:23:21 PM »
2001 they describe Coopers chute in the document below...
 

Offline Kermit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
  • Thanked: 108 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1942 on: April 25, 2019, 05:25:37 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

First off this guy was actually a hunting buddy who was there when the placard was found. As I recall they were picking up litter and had simply put the placard in their pocket and had no reason to mark the exact spot where it was found. His memory could actually be far better then Carroll Hicks. I had a hunting partner who had a terrible sense of direction and never had any idea where he was. The placard find location is one of ONLY two items ever recovered from the hyjacking. If you or others think the placard find location is meaningless, so be it.
I happen to think it’s relevant to at least giving a clue as to where the aircraft was flying SHORTLY before Cooper bailed. Many people have combed over Tina Bar site ad Nauseum but to my knowledge very few have ever been to the placard location. I find it interesting and the area is awesome !

I agree that the placard is very important. Furthermore, it has been largely overlooked as a valid piece of evidence that could clarify a flight path. I believe the reason it has been ignored for all of these years is because the Tena Bar money find was shortly thereafter and that immediately took over the spotlight.

Shutter, I have obtained the necessary info from Weyerhaeuser to gain access to the placard find spot. My primary objective will be to get a feel for the lay of the land, take pictures and perhaps leave a piece of a similar item behind to study any migration patterns that may occur over the course of the year.
Just to clarify what I stated a few days ago. I was there in the area just 6 days ago. There’s a sign saying a Discovery Pass is required PLUS there was a locked gate preventing entry and a Weyerhaeuser sign on it. It obviously isn’t a restrictive area BUT perhaps this is closed on a seasonal basis so you might want to check with Weyerhaeuser about the locked gate. I had a 4 wheel drive vehicle but road looked well traveled and in good condition.
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1943 on: April 25, 2019, 05:40:45 PM »
I watched the In Search Of program with Cooper again. Hicks claims once he got back he emptied his pockets of trash and showed it to his friend. sounds like they were separated when he found the placard. I also noticed how the placard is exactly like the one given to the FBI. it's a very good reproduction to be that detailed? also shows a large tear from the bottom center going up. you can see part of it on the photo provided by the FBI..
« Last Edit: April 25, 2019, 06:11:55 PM by Shutter »
 
The following users thanked this post: andrade1812

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1944 on: April 26, 2019, 01:52:41 AM »
In post number 1751 on this thread, Tom Kaye presented radiosonde data for Salem, Oregon (which is about 45 Nautical Miles south of Portland International Airport) and a location that is northwest of Seattle (more than 120 Nautical Miles from Portland International Airport).  Unfortunately, some of this data appears to have been affected due to a malfunction of the radiosonde equipment.

Consequently, some judgment was needed in interpreting the radiosonde data.  But after all things were considered, the wind direction was essentially from 225 degrees from 4000 feet to 10,000 feet and the wind speed varied between 31 and 35 knots (Nautical Miles Per Hour) over that same range.  These supposedly accurate wind speeds are somewhat greater than the predicted winds aloft speeds for the Portland area for the same time frame that is of interest here.  However, the wind speed of 31 knots from 225 degrees at 10,000 feet agrees quite well with the 32 knots from 215 degrees that I had arrived at during the flight path analysis for that altitude.

For the present analysis, four altitude segments were used and the time for the placard to descend through each of those segments was calculated and used to determine the horizontal distance that the placard traveled during those times.  The horizontal distances were summed and totaled 6.8 Nautical Miles.  This places the separation point for the placard about 1.3 Nautical Miles WEST of a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.  Earlier calculations using estimate data placed the separation point about 1.0 nautical miles EAST of a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.

In the initial placard calculations in 2011, Tom Kaye suggested evaluating the influence that rain would have on the descent of the placard.  There is no information on any weather above the 5000 foot overcast.  But there were light rain showers in the Portland area.  Surprisingly, there is quite a bit of information on the internet about the influence of rain on falling objects.  At one end of the scale, large rain drops would increase the rate of descent.  At the other end of the scale, light or misty rainfall would slow the rate of descent.  Since the available weather information indicated only light rain below 5000 feet, the rainfall effects were ignored and were conservative in any event.

The end result of the placard analysis is that it separated at a point that was close to, either EAST or WEST of, a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.  And that straight line passes about 1000 feet to the WEST of the money find location at Tina Bar.   

While there was light rain and several cloud layers including a complete overcast at 5000 feet in the Portland area, the weather was reasonably good and improving as indicated by the sea level pressure being above standard and increasing at all points south of Seattle.  In addition, the air temperatures were below standard and the overall result was that the atmospheric density in the Portland area was about two percent above the standard density.

 
« Last Edit: April 26, 2019, 01:57:58 AM by Robert99 »
 
The following users thanked this post: EU

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1945 on: April 26, 2019, 04:21:05 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
In post number 1751 on this thread, Tom Kaye presented radiosonde data for Salem, Oregon (which is about 45 Nautical Miles south of Portland International Airport) and a location that is northwest of Seattle (more than 120 Nautical Miles from Portland International Airport).  Unfortunately, some of this data appears to have been affected due to a malfunction of the radiosonde equipment.

Consequently, some judgment was needed in interpreting the radiosonde data.  But after all things were considered, the wind direction was essentially from 225 degrees from 4000 feet to 10,000 feet and the wind speed varied between 31 and 35 knots (Nautical Miles Per Hour) over that same range.  These supposedly accurate wind speeds are somewhat greater than the predicted winds aloft speeds for the Portland area for the same time frame that is of interest here.  However, the wind speed of 31 knots from 225 degrees at 10,000 feet agrees quite well with the 32 knots from 215 degrees that I had arrived at during the flight path analysis for that altitude.

For the present analysis, four altitude segments were used and the time for the placard to descend through each of those segments was calculated and used to determine the horizontal distance that the placard traveled during those times.  The horizontal distances were summed and totaled 6.8 Nautical Miles.  This places the separation point for the placard about 1.3 Nautical Miles WEST of a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.  Earlier calculations using estimate data placed the separation point about 1.0 nautical miles EAST of a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.

In the initial placard calculations in 2011, Tom Kaye suggested evaluating the influence that rain would have on the descent of the placard.  There is no information on any weather above the 5000 foot overcast.  But there were light rain showers in the Portland area.  Surprisingly, there is quite a bit of information on the internet about the influence of rain on falling objects.  At one end of the scale, large rain drops would increase the rate of descent.  At the other end of the scale, light or misty rainfall would slow the rate of descent.  Since the available weather information indicated only light rain below 5000 feet, the rainfall effects were ignored and were conservative in any event.

The end result of the placard analysis is that it separated at a point that was close to, either EAST or WEST of, a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.  And that straight line passes about 1000 feet to the WEST of the money find location at Tina Bar.   

While there was light rain and several cloud layers including a complete overcast at 5000 feet in the Portland area, the weather was reasonably good and improving as indicated by the sea level pressure being above standard and increasing at all points south of Seattle.  In addition, the air temperatures were below standard and the overall result was that the atmospheric density in the Portland area was about two percent above the standard density.
 

This is outstanding work.

I have argued that one need only look at the FBI and Boeing free-fall analysis conducted when they established a search area. It clearly showed that they expected a significant drift to the northeast.

This analysis provided by R99 is very problematic for the FBI's flight path. I do not know how it cannot be. The placard is an extremely important piece of evidence that should have been considered to a much greater degree than was actually the case. To be sure, there are other variables to factor, specifically, seven years of being on the ground. That said, if I had to hazard a guess, it would be that placard migration would be minimal on the forest floor, and to the east if anything given the general direction of airflow and the jetstream in that region.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1946 on: April 26, 2019, 07:05:08 AM »
Basing a parachute is entirely different from a card weighing less than an ounce. then you base the card from controlled testing. cards, plates, different size objects will behave differently. I'm now questioning the thickness of the placard. the card is not easily found either. Hominid might be right that it was exclusive to NWO.

My other concern is the tears and cuts in the card itself and how that would react vs a perfect 6x6 or 5x5 card. will it tumble in the condition it was in. you can't say one way or the other without some sort of testing or seeing the actual card itself.

Late for work...will continue later today..
 

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1947 on: April 26, 2019, 12:55:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Basing a parachute is entirely different from a card weighing less than an ounce. then you base the card from controlled testing. cards, plates, different size objects will behave differently. I'm now questioning the thickness of the placard. the card is not easily found either. Hominid might be right that it was exclusive to NWO.

My other concern is the tears and cuts in the card itself and how that would react vs a perfect 6x6 or 5x5 card. will it tumble in the condition it was in. you can't say one way or the other without some sort of testing or seeing the actual card itself.

Late for work...will continue later today..

Parachutes did not have anything to do directly with this analysis.  The 2011 analysis lists a source for the characteristics of tumbling plates as they fall.  That data has been used in all of these analyses. 
 
The following users thanked this post: EU

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1948 on: April 26, 2019, 01:33:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Basing a parachute is entirely different from a card weighing less than an ounce. then you base the card from controlled testing. cards, plates, different size objects will behave differently. I'm now questioning the thickness of the placard. the card is not easily found either. Hominid might be right that it was exclusive to NWO.

My other concern is the tears and cuts in the card itself and how that would react vs a perfect 6x6 or 5x5 card. will it tumble in the condition it was in. you can't say one way or the other without some sort of testing or seeing the actual card itself.

Late for work...will continue later today..

Parachutes did not have anything to do directly with this analysis.  The 2011 analysis lists a source for the characteristics of tumbling plates as they fall.  That data has been used in all of these analyses.

Is there a reference to this  tumbling plates  analysis?

What does  'tumbling plate' mean? I have a feeling lots of variables are being fudged!
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #1949 on: April 26, 2019, 01:38:41 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
In post number 1751 on this thread, Tom Kaye presented radiosonde data for Salem, Oregon (which is about 45 Nautical Miles south of Portland International Airport) and a location that is northwest of Seattle (more than 120 Nautical Miles from Portland International Airport).  Unfortunately, some of this data appears to have been affected due to a malfunction of the radiosonde equipment.

Consequently, some judgment was needed in interpreting the radiosonde data.  But after all things were considered, the wind direction was essentially from 225 degrees from 4000 feet to 10,000 feet and the wind speed varied between 31 and 35 knots (Nautical Miles Per Hour) over that same range.  These supposedly accurate wind speeds are somewhat greater than the predicted winds aloft speeds for the Portland area for the same time frame that is of interest here.  However, the wind speed of 31 knots from 225 degrees at 10,000 feet agrees quite well with the 32 knots from 215 degrees that I had arrived at during the flight path analysis for that altitude.

For the present analysis, four altitude segments were used and the time for the placard to descend through each of those segments was calculated and used to determine the horizontal distance that the placard traveled during those times.  The horizontal distances were summed and totaled 6.8 Nautical Miles.  This places the separation point for the placard about 1.3 Nautical Miles WEST of a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.  Earlier calculations using estimate data placed the separation point about 1.0 nautical miles EAST of a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.

In the initial placard calculations in 2011, Tom Kaye suggested evaluating the influence that rain would have on the descent of the placard.  There is no information on any weather above the 5000 foot overcast.  But there were light rain showers in the Portland area.  Surprisingly, there is quite a bit of information on the internet about the influence of rain on falling objects.  At one end of the scale, large rain drops would increase the rate of descent.  At the other end of the scale, light or misty rainfall would slow the rate of descent.  Since the available weather information indicated only light rain below 5000 feet, the rainfall effects were ignored and were conservative in any event.

The end result of the placard analysis is that it separated at a point that was close to, either EAST or WEST of, a straight line between the Malay and Canby Intersections.  And that straight line passes about 1000 feet to the WEST of the money find location at Tina Bar.   

While there was light rain and several cloud layers including a complete overcast at 5000 feet in the Portland area, the weather was reasonably good and improving as indicated by the sea level pressure being above standard and increasing at all points south of Seattle.  In addition, the air temperatures were below standard and the overall result was that the atmospheric density in the Portland area was about two percent above the standard density.
 

This is outstanding work.

I have argued that one need only look at the FBI and Boeing free-fall analysis conducted when they established a search area. It clearly showed that they expected a significant drift to the northeast.

This analysis provided by R99 is very problematic for the FBI's flight path. I do not know how it cannot be. The placard is an extremely important piece of evidence that should have been considered to a much greater degree than was actually the case. To be sure, there are other variables to factor, specifically, seven years of being on the ground. That said, if I had to hazard a guess, it would be that placard migration would be minimal on the forest floor, and to the east if anything given the general direction of airflow and the jetstream in that region.

Elvis, there was no FBI analysis! How many times until you get the history straight? It matters. Then you talk about the Boeing free-fall analysis - I assume you are talking about the Boeing sky divers club analysis?

At this point I think I need to question your credentials for doing any analysis of anyone's analysis in these matters. So let me ask: did Elvis skydive with his cape? Maybe you have an analysis of that!  ;)