NOBODY, takes everything as fact. at least from what I see. it's not the point of taking anyone's word. it's going by known evidence. a lot of it doesn't fit into your theory. nobody said anything was "infallible". you are speaking for others who never made that claim or imply we all did.
It can be turned onto you as well. you want us to believe a few possible error's on a map you don't trust to begin with is wrong and, only, you can tell us where it's right. only you can move the path where you see fit?
R99 has a very simple theory surrounding this. I don't believe it, but he's been working hard for years on it and I value what he says more than most on this forum. that doesn't make him right either though. I don't see him trying to reach out to the world screaming all of this.
The whole case is surrounded with mystery. that doesn't mean it's all bullshit or open to just "plug and play" with it as one desires.
Lets say the wind were just as perfect as they claim it was in direction. you base this card on certain tests done which I fully agree with. now, what characteristics will the card have torn up the way it was found. you KNOW for CERTAIN it will have no effect, correct? you know the card tumbled, correct? you know exactly what the area looks like where the card was found, how many trees were in the area. the odds of it being in that spot for 7 years. you have all of that, right? lets not forget what the wind was/is in that area on the ground, got it covered, right? you can't use the flight path, it's fake, or inaccurate so how can you use anything from it? how do you know the plane was around Toledo at all. the map some guy did 47 years ago, seriously? who were these clowns doing the weather? they were not on V23 at all, right? radar? the guy turned away from the screen once? the radar means nothing, so you can't even prove the plane was anywhere around Toledo? if you believe the radar is correct in that spot 62 NM away from Seattle. then you will have serious trouble in Portland with the radar, no?
Just because I voice out louder than others doesn't mean I read the 302's as if it was the bible!. I'm amazed how you make it out to be thrown together but use the very same evidence you slam? one guy made the map 47 years ago, that you use to support fact?