Pay attention!
OCR: Optical character recognition or optical character reader is the electronic or mechanical conversion of images of typed, handwritten or printed text into machine-encoded text, whether from a scanned document, a photo of a document, a scene-photo or from subtitle text superimposed on an image. Wikipedia You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginIt was inevitable that once the FBI began releasing its 302s that OCR would be used by somebody in the scanning and word/phrase sorting of these documents, for any truths in the DB Cooper Hijacking case. FJ's use of OCR attracted the attention of Andrade and Snowmman. FJ posted commenting in 2019:
November 30, 2019
On 11/30/2019 at 1:41 PM, Andrade1812 said: R99 said the same thing, the USAF tag rules it out. Felt nice while it lasted...
"
First thing I do is OCR any new FBI file, there is now far too much info to keep track of.. Stick them all in one folder and easily search for relevant info.. Georger can't find FBI FOIA #43.. never trust anything from such a inept sleuth. For everyone else. Here. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login /d.b.-cooper-part-43-of-43/view"
I laughed when I read FJ's snub of me, because little does he know ...literally! My education began with OCR analysis back in the 1960s. Quite obviously Gen-Xer FJ knows literally nothing about my background or the backgrounds of hundreds/thousands of other people as it relates to OCR, statistics, etc stretching clear back to World War II as computers and computer tools were being developed, across the board in education and research, and in the military ... in the world! FJ's snub is idiotic at its core and is just one reason why I don;t fully trust the work of word-sorter, FLYJACK with capitol letters. I have worked with people who could literally write the history of OCR and related analysis programs, especially as it developed in the 1960s and spread throughout every area of science known to Mankind!
Do I use OCR analysis on the FBI Cooper 302's and other related documents? No I don't. Why? Because it is very time consuming and mere 'words' and 'phrases' do not automatically equal TRUTH or even historical FACT. Moreover, there is no corpus of DB Cooper test to examine. This is why I have always asked for CONTEXT when people bring up words and phrases they found in some 302 or other document, people then claim reveals some hidden truth, in the Cooper case.
James R. Fitzgerald is an American criminal profiler, forensic linguist, ... a retired FBI agent best known for his application of OCR techniques in the Unabomber case resulting in the Unabomber being taken into custody on April 3, 1996. It took years to find and identify the Unabomber. The techniques used by Fitzgerald and his colleagues were developed in universities back in the 1940s-1960s so the current application of OCR by FLYJACK is hardly anything new. One problem in the Cooper case is there is no Manifesto Cooper wrote that we can explore and compare with other published works from around the world! The socalled Cooper letters are not a manifesto if they were even written by DB Cooper.
So far, DB Cooper is not known to have ever published a 'letter to the editor' or any other printed statement of himself and his views about anything ... just 'get the show on the road!" Words by themselves are not truth. Context and verification by other evidence is required. OCR analysis by itself is merely the start of a broader analysis. Like every other tool known to Mankind, when a tool is placed in the wrong hands, the tool can be as much destructive as it could be constructive! Its all in the application. Every parent knows that! FJ is looking for words and phrases he claims are the whole truth ... experienced people know otherwise. But who can argue with Flyjack and his applications of OCR. For me its like watching a board to estimate where FJ will land next! Its actually a little humorous . . .