"The money was then transported by SeaFirst bank security to a Seattle police detective who then drove it to the airport and handed over to NWA. The money was bundled in various counts so that no bundle was the same. Each bundle was secured by rubber bands and different counts so that it appeared the money was hastily gathered. "
"
This is per Carr. I believe there is nothing in the FBI files addressing this issue.
Just to clarify my thoughts, my opinion is the money was paper strapped in groups of 100, and that the random "bundles" mentioned above by Carr were groups of paper-strapped packets. That were secured by rubber bands. And it would be fine if there were random counts of packets in each rubber-banded bundle, if Carr reallly believed the info above, that he obtained.
I think that aligns with all the stories/information. Collecting groups of paper-strapped packets with rubber bands, is and was a practice, I think. The rubber banding was termporary, the strapping a longer term thing. (the strapping was done to aid counting, mostly)
I believe that I have seen what was probably FBI documentation that identified the Seattle detective who picked up the money at the bank and then drove it to the NWA facility at SEATAC. This detective then put on some clothing that indicated he was an NWA employee and accompanied Al Lee out to the airplane with the money, parachutes, and other items.
ADDENDUM: Flyjack has just posted about the money on DropZone. Suggest you take a look at his post #64120. The letter signed by J. Edgar Hoover transmitting the money serial numbers is the same one I remember seeing several years ago with the serial numbers attached.
Several points apply to this debate:
In addition to agents and bank employees who saw the form the money was in, all of the stewardesses saw the money when Cooper examined the money, even pulled some of the money out of the bag (during his offer made to Mucklow). So far as I know none of the stews have been interviewed on this issue! The issue never came up for them to be interviewed about it! Maybe its time to ask Mucklow etc 'what form was the money in' - were there any paper bands on the money you saw ?
2. Dorwin and other agents who worked robbery for 10+ years, who have seen and worked with "bait money" stored at banks, report this money is in two forms: some bound in groups with paper straps, and some wrapped in rubber bands. But in no case was money ever sent out to a hijacker or robber with paper straps on the bills. That, according to agents
violates all SECURITY protocols and procedures, of both banks and law enforcement. These agents believe that was the case in the Cooper hijacking.
3. Agents who I have spoken with who worked the excavation at Tina Bar report that 'no paper of any kind' was found during the excavation, just nails, wood, etc and two rusted pop cans buried some distance from the Ingram money find, but no paper (not even magazines or old books or writing paper) was found on Tina Bar.
4. Pat Ingram told me in two interviews nobody saw any paper on or around the money during their encounter with Cooper money at Tina Bar.
5. SA Carr can be asked today about his interview with bank employees, and Pat Ingram. I seem to recall that after Larry's interviews about this issue back in (2010?), Larry issued an email to all concerned including Tom Kaye, stating the results of his investigation. Has anyone bothered to ask Tom Kaye about this issue ?
6. One reference about the money in crew interviews by Mucklow is the passage: "Mucklow said what she observed was money packed in small packages with bank-type bands around each package." We do not know if these are Mucklows' actual words or the interpreted words of the interviewer. One person at DZ has cited this passage as evidence 'the money delivered to Cooper was packaged as packets (formal bank term = 100 bills each) with each 'packet' wrapped in paper straps. Each packet in turn consisted of groups of bills wrapped in rubber bands. In addition, the person claims other 'words and terms' found in FBI documents back up his claim that "Carr and Georger were wrong".
Georger is just a spectator in this whole episode!
Georger's suggestion is to interview Mucklow in particular and ask her what form the money was in when she saw it personally, and get beyond all of this 'soap opera' about what form the money was in when given Cooper. Georger is as curious as the next guy to know how all of this kah-kah resolves. Georger has no particular stake in any particular outcome! All Georger is after is the facts, if facts can even be obtained at this point. Georger is concerned that this issue will never be resolved because of competing claims and interests competing to dominate the DB Cooper story.
Interview Carr again. Interview Mucklow.