So, I emailed the two FBI documents detailing the DNA information to my genetic scientist friend (she’s well known, but I’ll protect her privacy for now). This is her response to me:
I just had a chance to read through these two documents. The first one says that the FBI was able to get DNA from items Q40 and Q41, which they combined. They were able to obtain a 10 locus CODIS profile from the combined sample. (Nowadays, CODIS includes 20 loci). The results indicated that the DNA came from more than one person, but they don't say how many - this is a common because sometimes it's not possible to say how many contributors there are.
My understanding is that according to CODIS guidelines, a mixture is uploadable to CODIS. If a suspect is identified, the probability is determined whether it's possible that he is one of the contributors to that mixture. If the answer is yes, there is more work to do, but I am not sure how they handle that.
The second report (undated but after 2008), says that the evidence was retested, and a male profile was obtained and uploaded to CODIS. The DNA profile came up with a list of people they wanted to test and compare to the CODIS profile. But then in 2006, it was decided that the profile was too degraded to identify anyone, but that it could be used to rule out suspects. But by the date of this report, not many had been tested and compared.
So there seems to be a profile in CODIS that still can be used for comparison, if you manage to get various suspects tested on the CODIS markers.
Not sure if this adds anything to the discussion that hasn’t already been said, but it’s an experts two cents at least.