Example of Sheridan rant.
I believe he has cancer, a tumor and glasses.
I don't believe he was sprayed with dioxin in Vietnam.
Do you think he was sprayed with dioxin, or soaked day after day?
(example of how he loves endless detail...why mention vein 7 )

"Do I wear glasses . . ." It's cancer! Five cancers thanks to the dear old military soaking me day after day with the deadly dioxin Agent Orange. The VA butchers cut out a cancerous tumor in my neck severing vein 7 which fans out all over the left side of the face affecting my eye, ear every thing. However I am glad the cancerous tumor is gone. Kaiser surgeons refused say "Well, you're 91. You'll most likely die of something else before the cancer kicks in". The butchers at VA were of like mind. I was very persistent.

BTW, Fryar told me he used to be a smoker.

okay.

I'm not sure how it is with ties, but at least nowadays, the date of patents can be very removed from manufacture dates. Like way after. 377 will tell you how you just have to file before selling or announcing stuff...The actual patent grant date can be after that.

The tie had a patent date on it? Or you're saying there was a patent update with a new patent number and something about J.C. Penny landed on the interval.

Can you provide the exact detail on this? It's not clear.

okay.

I'm not sure how it is with ties, but at least nowadays, the date of patents can be very removed from manufacture dates. Like way after. 377 will tell you how you just have to file before selling or announcing stuff...The actual patent grant date can be after that.

The tie had a patent date on it? Or you're saying there was a patent update with a new patent number and something about J.C. Penny landed on the interval.

Can you provide the exact detail on this? It's not clear.

There was a patent in place for the tie knot mechanism. It was updated in a pending mode from 1964-1965 when it was officially granted. I do not have the exact dates in front of me pertaining to all of this but I have reviewed these dates. That said, the tie was produced using the old mechanism, before the updated pending patent was filed for the new mechanism.

well you're tainted now.
Of course Sheridan Jr. won't talk to you. You've self-identified as a nutjob.

Try as you might, you're not going to get under my skin.

You act like you're on a mission from god, and that I care whether I get under your skin?

No one cares.

That's the real takeaway from all of this. No one cares. Pretending that there is all sorts of real stuff going on is silly.
Bruce has the best attitude on all of this. I like his writing and reporting the best. I'll even grant him his remote viewing.

People who act like children always care. Come on now snowman.

Okay, non-child amateur psychologist.

Assume Sheridan was Cooper. What's the best way to interact with him now?
Your claim is that you're superior psychology skills and understanding of people, to get to "the truth" whatever that may be?

I don't see that. You're in a hole, with nowhere to dig more, so you want to claim the hole is all you needed.

Why do you have such a need to proclaim you have the best hole?

How touching. I'll stop wasting my time with you now.