EU
here's an example of why you're a little bit nuts like must cooper sleuths.
The reserve that Cooper took, was very unlikely to be daisy chained.
For you to claim that it was and that you know that somehow,
and that Sheridan saw it and says it was daisychained also,
is just bullshit.
All you know is Sheridan said something about daisy-chaining. You don't know Sheridan enough to understand why he said that.
Also remember he's old, and kinda nuts. You're reading tea leaves in a silly way, and it says more about you, than Sheridan
So yeah, you should be insulted. I"m saying 92 year old Sheridan is more clued-in than you are!
Why call someone nuts? Is there really any justification for such a comment in this context?
It reminds me of Blevins. I happened to come across an article that he wrote on October 17th on his blog site in which he called me "brainless." This in an article where he challenges my assertions regarding Sheridan. Why? For what purpose? To what end?
I must say I don't understand this venom. I'm not saying I'm Jesus Christ, or anything close, but I really do try to steer clear of such vitriol.
That said, it would be nice if you took the high ground and apologized. I don't need your apology, but it would be a pleasant gesture.